Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of media on individuals
Impact of media on individuals
Impact of media on individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of media on individuals
In “Defending Against the Indefensible,” author and professor Neil Postman proposes that language has been abused in modern society by people manipulating it and brainwashing the others. Hence, he suggests seven elements for critical intelligence that can help with identifying and avoiding the manipulative use of language: definition, questions, simple words, metaphor, reification, style and tone, and media. The first principle Postman suggests is that people should reflect upon any definition before accepting it blindly. Definitions are defined by other people rather than by god. The so called definitions can be biased due to different point of views people have. Therefore, Postman suggests students imagine “alternative definitions for every important concept and term they must deal with in school” (23). The second idea Postman proposes is that all the answers we have come from asking questions. Our knowledge comes from …show more content…
asking questions. What kind of answer we get depends on the kind of questions we ask. Consequently, he suggests schools to teach students about the art of asking the right question and how to ask questions in different subjects. Then students can get the answers they are looking for. Third, Postman proposes the idea of simple words.
He thinks that the difficult words in language are actually the simple words, such as true or good. These words can have many different meanings and every use of them can be different. Postman suggests teaching students the full range of meanings in these simple words, so they can discover the true meaning behind each word. Fourth, Postman talks about the idea of using metaphors. Every subject uses metaphors to present ideas. This idea also applies to politics as politicians use metaphors in their speeches. Without the proper studying, students will not be able to understand the real meanings behind these metaphors. Postman’s fifth idea is reification, which is used to confuse people with names and things. A name might not necessarily suggest the real meaning behind it. This is why people use this idea in advertisements and politics so they can lure people into what is actually not there. Postman then suggests students to study reification, so that they could identify the problem and work it
over. Sixth, Postman asks students to pay attention to the style and tone of language. Each subject in the universe has its own style and tone to address ideas. He finds textbook language as dull so he asks teachers to provide students with different styles and tone of knowledge. Then students will be able to tell the differences between the subjects. The seventh and final concept Postman suggests is media. He thinks that the medium which we communicate ideas can be essentially biased. These mediums creates different points of view and therefore affects people’s views. The non-neutrality of the media actually transforms our custom and views. Therefore he suggests to have this concept in student’s education, so that they can see the clear image and real story behind the media. Overall, Postman suggests students to learn the seven concepts he proposed. Then they can have the skills to interpret the information they receives. These are only the beginning and there is a lot more to learn about.
Heinrichs begins by explaining the art of rhetoric and laying out the basic tools of argument. He emphasizes the importance of using the proper tense to avoid arguing the wrong issue. Furthermore, he introduces logos, ethos and pathos and shows how to “wield” each rhetorical tool. In Part 2, Heinrichs discusses common logical fallacies as well as rhetorical fouls. He remarks rhetoric’s single rule of never arguing the inarguable and demonstrates how ethos helps to know whom to trust. In Part 3, Kairos becomes an important tool for knowing the right time to persuade one’s audience. In Part 4 of the novel, the author provides examples of how to use rhetorical tools previously introduced in the
His first principle is definition. Students must consider that definitions are not concrete. They are created by people, which make definitions subjective rather than objective. One person’s definition of something may be different from another person’s, and they both could be correct. The definition is largely dependant on the viewer’s
Palmer, William. "Rhetorical Analysis." Discovering Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Writing, and Style. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2012. 268-69. Print.
However, “The Coddling of the American Mind” is not an informative piece, as it is filled with opinions and methods of emotional persuasion towards the author's belief upon the topic. The rhetorical device pathos is abundant towards the end of the article where the author is dependent on negative connotations and emotionally captivating statements in order to convey the idea that students should be aware of the potential to be offended and accepting of it as a part of life. Lukianoff and Haidt's negative vocabulary can be seen through words such as “Blaming” and “catastrophizing”; these words are synonymous with overreacting or the inability to accept and negatively impact the opposing side's argument about student anxiety. Negative connotative vocabulary alongside statements directed towards the reader's emotions such as, “In June, a professor protecting himself with a pseudonym wrote an essay for Vox describing how gingerly he now has to teach. “I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify Me,” the headline
In the essay “From Ancient Greece to Iraq, the Power of Words in Wartime” by Robin Tolmach Lakoff, Lakoff discusses the fact that words are a tool as well when it comes to wars. She talks about the differences between our natural want and ability to kill things, and the mental training soldiers receive to make it easier for them. Lakoff talks about the practice of dehumanizing the “enemy” through nicknames that make us feel superior then our foes, and the repercussions of using this type of language. In the essay by George Orwell, “Politics and the English Language”, Orwell talks about the decay of the English language, especially in political writings. He discusses the fact that when it comes to writing, political being the main focus, it’s
David Foster Wallace, author of the essay “Authority and American Usage*,” praises and advocates for “good” writers who have a strong rhetorical ability, which he defines as “the persuasive use of language to influence the thoughts and actions of an audience” (Wallace 628). To have a strong rhetorical ability, an author needs to be aware of whom their audience is, in order to present their information in a way that will be influential on their audience. Wallace recognizes that an author who applies a strong rhetorical ability will be able to connect with the audience so that they respond “not just to [their] utterance but also to [them]” (Wallace 641). An author needs to take into consideration not just content, syntax and grammatical structure (their “utterance”) but also how their character will be perceived by their audience. A positive tone will make the author seem more pleasant and relatable, whereas a negative tone connotes arrogance and pretentiousness. That is why it is crucial for an author to recognize that an audience will respond to “them” and not just their “utterance,” as an author’s appearance to their readers can also shape how impactful their writing is.
Moore, Michael. “Idiot Nation.” Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. Ed. Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2010. 128-145.
Poststructuralists aggressively declares that we cannot trust linguistic systems to convey truth, the foundations of reality are unpredictable and the world of literacy as we know it begins to unravel...
Rhetoric can be found in our day to day lives and is essentially used to convince other people over something or to pass across a message in ones point of view. The most common places where rhetoric can be found are in social media and networking, religion, political speeches and advertising. In political speeches and advertisements, rhetoric gets the listeners who are the public to agree with the presenters point of view without arguing yet the arguer does not offer important information of intellectual value as to why they are insisting on their argument. For example, a politician may come to a podium and start arguing negatively about another party. Some even term their opponents parties as cancer that will eat up the society. This has negative connotations but with no intrinsic meaning since, they have no prove of what they are alleging, all they want is the public to believe in them. Politicians use rhetoric in form of a metaphor by insinuating that their opponents share characteristics with certain things or anything of their choosing and at times it even sounds abusive...
Postman’s main argument here is that the power of typography has the ability to control discourse. When language is controlled by print, an idea, a fact, or a claim is the result. And today we have this unrelenting demand to understand and know everything we are presented with. Print gave priority to the intellectual and rational mind, therefore encouraging serious, logical public discourse. Postman supports this claim by arguing that the Thomas Paine’s “Age of Reason”, a written pamphlet that challenged the religious and political institutions of the 18th century, was coexistent with the growth of print culture. Paine scrutinized the Bible and charged its divine claims as false. He did this through careful analysis and came up with logical conclusions. In essence, typography and print created and changed people’s identities and beliefs.
thinking comes from that and then in the long run more knowledge comes. It is a continuous cycle that never stops.
“Language is understood to be a distinguishing feature of human beings, and many believe that it is through language that we express our humanity, shape reality, and bring knowledge into being and to others.” (Phillips) As a trainer, I teach people the importance of what we say and how we say it. Language diversity goes beyond knowing a variety of languages, such as Spanish, French and German. It is about using a variety of words and phrases that will suite a particular situation. Language plays a significant role in the critical thinking process because it not only portrays the thoughts of the speaker or writer, but it also tells the receiver of the message how to feel. Language and critical thinking marry especially when one is tackling the art of persuasion. As this paper continues, one will be able to determine the relationship between language and critical thinking.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in
Question No. 5 “No knowledge can be produced by a single way of knowing.” Discuss.
Her approach is capable of identifying and describing the underlying mechanisms that contribute to those disorders in discourse which are embedded in a particular context, at a specific moment, and inevitably affect communication. Wodak’s work on the discourse of anti-Semitism in 1990 led to the development of an approach she termed the Discourse-Historical Method. The term historical occupies a unique place in this approach. It denotes an attempt to systematically integrate all available background information in the analysis and interpretation of the many layers of a written or spoken text. As a result, the study of Wodak and her colleagues’ showed that the context of the discourse had a significant impact on the structure, function, and context of the utterances. This method is based on the belief that language “manifests social processes and interaction” and generates those processes as well (Wodak & Ludwig, 1999, p. 12). This method analyses language from a three-fold perspective: first, the assumption that discourse involves power and ideologies. “No interaction exists where power relations do not prevail and where values and norms do not have a relevant role” (p. 12). Secondly, “discourse … is always historical, that is, it is connected synchronically and diachronically with other communicative events which are happening at the same time or which have happened before” (p. 12). The third feature