Mystic River Analysis

1456 Words3 Pages

Everyone is dealt their personal, unique set of cards at birth. Some come with privilege; others act as a disservice. Every background is an integral component of the adult that a child grows to become. However, a common misinterpretation is that where you come from is the sole determinant of where you are going. In Mystic River, Dennis Lehane uses abnormal childhood events paradoxically to portray that a difficult childhood can serve as a long term benefit and a privileged childhood can be a detriment. While portrayed as a permanent detriment, juvenile detention has the potential to turn delinquent children into successful adults. According to a study done on youth in the legal punishment system, adolescents who serve in adult prisons are …show more content…

(Bandes). Clearly, prison does not generally serve juveniles well. The purpose is for criminals to face punishment and come out changed and unwilling to return to a life of crime. Prison is a life altering time for all criminals, especially children who are at a very influential stage in life. Instead of achieving correction, it molds juvenile criminals into more violent versions of themselves who present more of threat to society coming out than they do after sentencing. In Mystic River, a central character finds himself in adult prison in his early teenage years after stealing his teacher’s car as a practical joke: “Jimmy was driving and he took it for a hell of a spin around Buckingham, beeping the horn and waving to girls, and gunning the engine until a police cruiser spotted them and they ended up totaling the car against a dumpster” (Lehane 41). According to the study, Jimmy is statistically destined for a life of crime. Combining his young age and the prison system, Jimmy seems like a perfect example of how the justice system turns criminals into darker versions of themselves. However, Lehane flips the script as he describes Jimmy’s new life: “Thirteen years since he’d walked out of prison, and he owned a corner …show more content…

However, while the “perfect childhood” is often viewed as having both parents at home, going to private school, and staying out of trouble, it does not always produce successful adults. Academically, attending a private or college preparatory high school provides an advantage. From grade 10 to graduate school, private school students fare better academically than their peers in public schools (Brean). With smaller class sizes and higher paid teachers, it is widely known and fairly consistent throughout all research that private school provides a superior learning environment to public schools. Simply stated, children who go to private school are more likely to be successful academically than their public school counterparts. Additionally, children raised by single mothers are more likely to fare worse on a number of dimensions, including their school achievement (Sawhill). Based on these two evidence backed statements, it can be inferred that the optimal situation for child’s educational development would be in a private school with two parents at home. However, these statistics do not only apply to childhood. School success is a major factor in college admissions, and transitively career options later in life. In Mystic River, Sean Devine, therefore, has it all: “Sean had been accepted to Latin School, and would begin seventh grade there in

Open Document