MFRS 137 Contingent Liability Case Study

486 Words1 Page

Since material litigation is contingent liabilities to the company, they should disclose it according to MFRS 137 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities, and Contingent Assets. If a contingent liability is possible the company must disclose the contingent liability and loss in the notes to the financial statements but if a contingent liability is remote, then the company should not report the liability and loss and will not disclose it. MFRS 137 paragraph 84 to 92 is about disclosure that is required for provisions, contingent liabilities, and contingent assets. The company should follow the requirement that had been stated in MFRS 137. According to the MFRS 137, paragraph 84, for each class of provision, an entity shall disclose: (a) The carrying …show more content…

(b) An indication of the uncertainties relating to the amount or timing of any outflow. (c) The possibility of any reimbursement. According to paragraph 89, an inflow of economic benefits is probable, an entity shall disclose a brief description of the nature of the contingent assets at the end of the reporting period, and, where practicable, an estimate of their financial effect, measured using the principles set out for provisions in paragraphs 36–52. Paragraph 92 stated, disclosure of some or all of the information required by paragraphs 84–89 can be expected to prejudice seriously the position of the entity in a dispute with other parties on the subject matter of the provision, contingent liability or contingent asset. In such cases, an entity need not disclose the information, but shall disclose the general nature of the dispute, together with the fact that, and reason why, the information has not been

Open Document