Luke's Three Dimensions of Power

4687 Words10 Pages

Luke's Three Dimensions of Power

"Power serves to create power. Powerlessness serves to re-enforce

powerlessness"(Gaventa,1980:256). Such is the essence of the on going

relationship between the Powerful and the Powerless of the Appalachian Valley

where acquiescence of the repressed has become not only common practice but a

way of life and a means of survival. In his novel Power and Powerlessness, John

Gaventa examines the oppressive and desperate situation of the Appalachian coal

miners under the autocratic power of absentee land-owners, local elites, and

corrupt union leaders. His analyses is based on Lukes three-dimensional

understanding of power from his book Power: A Radical View. Gaventa applies the

three notions of power to the politics of inequalities in the Appalachian Valley

and, while demonstrating the inadequacies of the first or 'pluralist' approach

and the merits of the second and particularly the third dimensions, asserts that

the interrelationship and reinforcing affect of all three dimensions is

necessary for an in depth understanding of the "total impact of power upon the

actions [or inactions] and conceptions of the powerless"(Gaventa:256)

This essay will examine Luke's three power dimensions and their

applicability to Gaventa's account of the inequities found in the valleys of the

Cumberland Mountains. Reasons for the mountain people's submission and non-

participation will be recognized and their nexus with the power relationship

established. In this way, Gaventa's dissatisfaction with the pluralist approach

will be justified and the emphatic ability of the other two dimensions to

withhold issues and shape behaviour will be verified as principal agents of

Power and Powerlessness.

The one dimensional view of power is often called the 'pluralist'

approach and emphasizes the exercise of power through decision making and

observable behaviour. Robert Dahl, a major proponent of this view, defines

power as occurring in a situation where "A has power over B to the extent he can

get B to do something that B would not otherwise do"(Dahl as cited in Lukes,

1974:11). A's power therefore is defined in terms of B and the extent to which

A prevails is determined by its higher ratio of 'successes' and 'defeats' over B.

Observable behaviour then becomes a key factor in the pluralist approach

to power. Dahl's Who Govern's? expresses the pluralist belief that the

political arena is an open system where everyone may participate and express

grievances which in turn lead to decision making. Those who propose

alternatives and initiate issues which contribute to the decision making process

are demonstrating observable influence and control over those who failed all

together to express any interest in the political process.

The Pluralist approach assumes that in an open system, all people, not

Open Document