Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The reign of King Louis XIV
The reign of King Louis XIV
The reign of King Louis XIV
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The reign of King Louis XIV
Louis XIV Louis XIV was a good leader for many reasons, some of which will come out in this essay. Louis ruled with an iron fist, he didn't let anyone mess with France, and if they did , he made them suffer. Second, Louis had mercy on those who betrayed him, a trait rarely seen in his day and age. Third most he did his best to bring down the nobles of France, particularly the more richer ones who thought they were above the law. Louis ruled with an iron fist he didn't let anyone mess around with France, if anyone had the guts to even think about challenging his power over the people of France he would do he would go out of his way to make them suffer. (*1) “At the same time he regarded himself as God's deputy in France and would allow no challenge to his authority, from the Pope or anyone else” Louis got into many wars while he was ruler of France, he was quick to the draw and did not hesitate to start a war. To show the Catholics that he was still a catholic king ,Louis kept mounting pressure on the French Protestants, until 1685 when he revoked Edict of Nantes. Then he forbid anyone to practice Calvinism. To the people of France this showed great strength on the part of Louis, the fact that he could keep he kept everyone in France inline at the same time. everyone in France obeyed him because he was such a grand, rich, fair king. Louis got into many wars with other countries over the stupidest things, when Charles II were to die with no kids, he made he offered to make Louis's grandson the sole beneficiary of the vast inheritance to be left behind, Louis Accepted the the offer out of pure greed, but that dicision meant war with Austria. Although, Louis was already getting half of the money he still greedily accepted the offer, if he had not accepted the offer war could have been avoided, but hey we all make mistakes The second thing about Louis that made him a good leader was that he had Mercy on those who betrayed him which was something rarely seen in that time. Most Rulers just murdered those who betrayed them, but Louis would jail them. In the case of Louis's most important lieutenant, named Mazarin, He was charged with peculation and found guilty then sentenced to banishment from France. Instead of letting the whole ordeal go down Louis intervened and changed Mazarins sentence from banishment to imprisonment for life.
Louis XIV, also known as the Sun King, was an absolutist monarch of France who sought to heavily suppress the power of novels while simultaneously promoting the ideals of a “divine right monarchy”. A man notorious for his incredible spending on various personal ventures, such as the extremely costly construction of a new palace at Versailles, Louis XIV was often the subject of criticism and mockery, especially from the nobles who hoped to discredit him and his absolutist regime. Overall, Louis XIV did predominantly act in a manner with his own personal agenda in mind, as seen through his Revocation of the Edict of Nantes, occurring as a result of his desire to have his country fall in line with his own beliefs, his unrelenting expenditures
...rned the essential plans that a leader would need to lead him troops. He also had the morale and spirits to keep the troops ready to fight for the freedom they wanted, as well as his ability to command such troops in placement and tactics.
at the rioters. These actions did not go unnoticed by the Directory. Also Napoleon’s wife had
One of the greatest men to walk this earth was our 16th president, Abraham Lincoln. As we all know Lincoln achieved many attributes in his time. Some of his most famous achievements include: signing off on the Emancipation Proclamation, giving numerous speeches like the Inaugural Address and Gettysburg Address, and ending one of the most brutal battles in history: the Civil War. What we weren’t taught in class or through reading history books was that Lincoln became a unique type of hunter that killed vampires while on his road to presidency. It wasn’t until 2012, when director Tim Bekmambetov turned the novel Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter into a film that Lincoln fans began to see him as more than a great President, but also a vampire hunter. According to Mike Scott in his review about Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, the film “re-imagines our 16th president as a secret, ax-wielding slayer of bloodsuckers” (Mike Scott). The movie is not meant to be a documentary, it’s rather an action packed bloody mess. Furthermore, while the film doesn’t hit all of the highlights of Lincoln’s life, it rewrites history just a little bit.
In the book Team of Rivals, Abraham Lincoln strongly opposes slavery, he states that slavery needs to be confined to the places where it existed. Lincoln first want to stop slavery from progressing more, then he will deal with how to abolish it completely (Goodwin 9-111). In the book Lincoln Vampire Hunter the author also explains how Lincoln hates slavery, Lincoln states that slavery is a sin. However, in the vampire hunter Lincoln tries to make a connection between slavery and vampires, which is obviously inaccurate. In the vampire hunter Lincoln lets his angry get over the issue of slavery and he creates a speech that will take a national significance among the opponents of slavery (Grahame-Smith 17-132). That is how the authors showed Lincoln’s view on slavery, now the real view that Lincoln had on slavery was that he really did oppose slavery, however he still didn’t think that African American’s should have the same rights as a white person. Apparently Lincoln did not see slaves as a part of the American society, rather he saw them as an alien who were uprooted from their own society and brought overseas to America (Foner). Both of the authors used the historical facts were accurate to the real facts on slavery, however both the authors incorporated the information in two different
... forgive his captors and abusers. Louis forgave the same people that almost caused his death. This incredible act is a lesson that we could all learn from.
King Louis nation had a massive reaction focused on the King’s plight and return. The Reaction was not only seen in Paris alone but also on the other provinces, where a widespread phobia caused by foreign invasion led to the utter news of the King’s escape. Nevertheless, Tackett identifies the royal family plight to flee France as one of the most critical moments in the history of the French revolution. The king’s flight opens a window to the whole of the French society during the revolution. The purpose of the Kings flight was to offer freedom of action in terms of power and this was in regards to the King’s power and rule. The royal couple together with their advisers had unclear political agenda for their nation. Similarly, it is in the vent of these unclear goals factored by the Kind’s technical knowhow of not making decisive decisions that led to the stoppage of the royal family at Varennes and thereafter their return to Paris. The consequence of their return to Paris was the onset of the constant possibility of the end of the Monarch reign. On the same case, it is as a result of the royal family escape attempt and failure necessitated the integrity of the King as a constitutional monarch. On a much more political notion, The King’s hope of survival is mitigated
Louis XIV was one of four leaders, (along with Charles V, Napoleon, and Adolf Hitler) who had an opportunity to establish their hegemony over much of Europe in the time period after 1500. Although Louis XIV failed in his attempt to dominate Europe politically, it was during this time span that Europe was very strongly influenced by French culture and civilization.
later he crowned himself as Emperor King. He turned the French against Europe and took over
Louis placed himself at the center of all decision making and surrounded himself with men who posed no threat to his power. Louis’s successful leadership can be attributed to Louis setting himself at the top of the hierarchy and making all those under him work for his favors. Louis who believed it was his divine right to be king, and worked with men who were loyal and dependent upon only him. Louis did not
Of all the absolute rulers in Europe, by far the best example of one, and the most powerful, was Louis XIV of France. Although Louis had some failures, he also had many successes. He controlled France’s money and had many different ways to get, as well as keep his power, and he knew how to delegate jobs to smart, but loyal people.
In 2011, author Andy Weir self-published his debut novel, The Martian. Little did Weir know that his self-published debut novel science fiction novel would become well received by readers. The success of the novel lead to a film adaptation of the book directed by Ridley Scott, which was released in 2015. While the book and film adaptation hold many similarities, a few major differences arise. For example, major changes occur in the beginning scene and epilogue. The book makes more known the ethical decisions and challenges faced with the unprecedented space event. Whereas, the film adaptation removes the science and mathematical calculations, which account for the success of the space mission. The differences lead to changes in character’s attitudes and personal
... move, defunding any revolts they might plan, and preoccupying their time with petty social matters instead of matters of the state. If Louis’ reign was not supported by the enabling qualities of the Palace of Versailles, his reign would certainly not be as absolute as it was.
...les of being a great ruler. They ruled in completely different styles, but nevertheless, they both had an extreme passion, the ability to inspire and they were both honorable and fair.
After the death of his advisor, Colbert, Louis’s reign over France grew weak. He lost control over finances and while he said his main goal was to increase French supremacy, he put France into thirty one years worth of wars.