Lee Boyd Malvo Research Paper

500 Words1 Page

Entitled Sniper It’s a known fact that kids aren’t to be trusted, they are young, and foolish, labeled too immature to know better. There are many sides to be considered when dealing with the severity of choosing the correct punishment for teenage offenders. Controversy is shown when a federal judge determines it is “unconstitutional” for a juvenile to be definitively sentenced life in prison. In Correction One’s May 27, 2017 article, “Federal judge tosses out life sentences for DC sniper” written by Matthew Barakat, explains judge’s final call Lee Boyd Malvo and that he was entitled to a new sentence as Malvo was only 17 when he was arrested in 2002. Malvo murdered 10 people and injured over a dozen, but his age and immaturity say it is unethical to waste away life in prison. Many agree that a guaranteed lifetime rotting in a cell is beyond devastating for a young criminal condemned to an empty life of solitude, but 10 lives were stolen, immaturity is not excusable. …show more content…

District Judge, “tossed out” Lee Boyd Malvo’s two life sentences. Malvo’s accomplice in the killings, John Allen Muhammad, was executed in 2009. Individuals with background and previous history with the case claim that Malvo “fits the criteria for a harsh sentence”. Ultimately Malvo was convicted of capital murder, which is murder involving a police officer, firefighter, or paramedic, the victims is a child, and if the crime is committed during another brutal crime. Finally a plea bargain was negotiated and settled with one life sentence ending the trial. Until now, it is being claimed Malvo is entitled to a new hearing because there are right Malvo didn't know he

Open Document