Khaled Hosseini's The Kite Runner

1429 Words3 Pages

When we are out with friends, eating a steak, most of us do not stop to think of the cow that was raised to die so there could be food on our plate. When we are buying a pair of jeans from a mainstream clothing store, we rarely stop to wonder about the slave-like conditions a worker in a developing country had to endure in during their position. In a position of affluence, we rarely think about unpleasantries unless they are unavoidable. In Khaled Hosseini’s novel The Kite Runner, we are introduced to the Afghan world and social hierarchy as Amir, a Pashtun boy born into a moneyed household but increasingly deteriorating Afghanistan flees the country. When fleeing, he leaves behind his Hazara half-brother, Hassan,who he did not protect from …show more content…

Hosseini paints the Afghan social structure as eminently stratified, where even as a child, Amir was aware of his fortune over that of Hassan, witnessing “people… [call] Hazaras mice-eating, flat-nosed, load-carrying donkeys”(10), but becoming conscious of the ubiquity of the dynamic through one of his deceased mother’s books which stated that the Pashtun people “had persecuted and oppressed the Hazaras”(10) and because of this, Hazaras were consequently discriminated against and forced to work as indentured servants in Afghanistan. This relationship is present between Amir and Hassan, Baba and Ali; where even though the latter of the two sets were servants of the former, there was a sense of brotherhood between the boys and men. As a result of this, Amir had an inkling that it was wrong to take advantage of Hassan’s devotion. However, in his eyes, “[he] was a Pashtun and [Hassan] was a Hazara, [he] was Sunni and [Hassan] was Shi’a, and nothing was going to change that”(25). Amir’s affluence never truly provided him with the insight to ponder why it was that he was educated and could have everything he wanted while Hassan had to work all day to support him. When in a position of dominance, one does not need to consider those below them, as no …show more content…

Fundamentally, Amir was not a deprave person so when he returned to Afghanistan with the new perspective he had gained through age and experience in America; he was able to objectively witness the social stratification and injustices that accompanied life for those left in Afghanistan. However, Amir thought the destitution within his country was a novelty that Afghanistan had acquired as a result of continuous corrupt governments, feeling “like a tourist in [his] own country”(231) after being in America for two decades. Farid, a local who was assisting Amir in his quest to rescue Sohrab, had firsthand experience with the raw Afghanistan, informing Amir that he “was always a tourist [there],...he just didn’t know it”(232). Amir had taken for granted his dominant role and consequently blinded himself from the horrors those not as well-off as himself faced. Effectively, he was not just being immoral, he was taking advantage of his birth place without putting himself in the shoes of the Hazaras so that he would not have to take direct action and face the reality that he had contributed to. Amir’s acceptance of his role in the stratification of Afghanistan came after he had taken Sohrab home, when he acknowledged that as opposed

Open Document