Kent Vs Us

590 Words2 Pages

Have you heard of Kent vs. United States? A 16-year-old African American boy by the name of Morris A. Kent Jr., was tried as an adult for assault charges of multiple home burglaries, robberies, and rapes. Police detained Morris and took him into court trial. In 1966, racism became a whole new meaning in the Superme Court, and this case is one of the key reasons why racism is still alive in the United States. Teenagers can be tried as adults after several convictions, but what you don’t know is that teenagers can be sentenced to life in prison after the crime of homicide. “Juvenile court waived its jurisdiction, which allowed Kent Jr. to be tried as an adult” (Fortas N.P.), and could be locked up in prison. One of the jury’s on trial proved Kent’s guiltiness, and was sentenced a wide range of 30-90 years in prison. Morris had been on probation since he was 14 years old. Kent was put on custody with his mother, but on September 2, 1961, somebody had broke into a women’s apartment, took her wallet, and raped her. The fingerprints matched up with Kent Jr.’s. Morris was taken to police headquarters, where officers had interrogated him (G.P.O. 1). He then admitted his involvement in office, which then led to his …show more content…

Although judges did not know the right amount of time for these brutal incidents, they knew Kent Jr. could be tried to life in prison. Kent’s family thought this was an outrageous amount of time one 16-year-old could be in prison for. Although it was harsh, Morris had 8 convictions of rape and robbery, which is a serious matter of law. Kent Jr. should not have tried as an adult for his convictions, even if they were that bad. The Supreme Court noted that the objectives are only to “provide measures of guidance and protection for teenagers and society” (Flickeflu N.P.). “There is no place in the system of law for a result of such hard punishment without ceremony” (Flickeflu

Open Document