Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Quotes

1472 Words3 Pages

Tragic Hero Essay The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is the famously known play written by William Shakespeare. Shakespeare is the creator of the concept of a tragic hero. He has five traditional elements as part of his basis and in this play, he created Marcus Brutus in the shoes of a tragic hero. According to the title of this play, one would assume that Julius Caesar is the main character of the play but in reality, Brutus is recognized as the main protagonist. Marcus Brutus lived to be forty-three years old during the era of ancient Rome. He was an honorable man who ultimately became the leader of the conspirators and led himself to his own downfall. Marcus Brutus is not only the main character of the play but he is also the ideal example …show more content…

In this quote, Cassius is dialoguing with Brutus and telling him how Junius Brutus did and would do everything he could in order to keep Rome as a democracy and away from kings. All tragic heroes suffer a catastrophe and in this case, Brutus suffered the calamity of being the only “conspirator” who killed Caesar with a noble and honorable reason. As time passed he started to notice that the other conspirators were corrupt at the time of their doing and they killed Caesar for non-honorable reasons. During act four, Brutus had a serious conversation with Cassius and he pointed out how all of the corrupt conspirators stabbed Caesar for reasons, other than justice. “Remember March, the ides of March remember. Did not great Julius bleed for justice' sake? What villain touched his body, that did stab, And not for justice?” (Shakespeare 4.3.18-28). In the plight of Marcus Brutus, his tragic flaw was being gullible and very stubborn. Alice Shalvi, the author of Brutus’s Personal Failure Is the Central Tragedy, pointed out that “The ultimate factor in persuading Brutus to join the conspiracy is his belief that his countrymen wish him to act on their behalf, a belief based in the letters” (Shelvi 71). Based on what Shalvi said one can tell that Brutus was easy to persuade with a couple tricks such as the “pleas” and fake letters of the countrymen. Marcus Brutus was gullible and was easily …show more content…

Marcus Brutus makes many minor decisions that lead to major unfavorable outcomes. For example, Brutus decided to let Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral with a few conditions that would show that the conspirators had all the power there. Although, letting Antony speak was a bad decision because he used a lot of verbal ironies and emotional appeal in such a way that the crowd was easily moved and turned into a raging mob which would go as far as to kill Cassius and Brutus. Cassius, through an aside, had spoken to Brutus and said: “ Know you how much the people may be moved by that which he will utter” (Shakespeare 2.1. 247-248). This bad decision was all on Brutus for Cassius had given a different point of view. Marcus’s second incorrect choice was to march to Philippi. Once again, Cassius had an opposing view to that of Brutus’s and he had said that staying in Sardinia could give their troops an advantage of preparedness and rest. Brutus disagreed and followed his leader instinct and led them in a march to Philippi. On his way there, he encountered the ghost of Caesar twice and it put him in scenarios where both he and Cassius were very close to defeat. Brutus’s final accommodation ways to celebrate victory too soon and to send his troops on a looting spree. It caused a misunderstanding with Cassius, Titinius, and Pindarus. This misunderstanding resulted in Cassius

Open Document