Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

403 Words1 Page

In William Shakespeare’s, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, the speeches were given by both Brutus, and Mark Antony is very persuasive before their audience, but it was rhetorical devices that were being used in various ways that significantly impacted the people of Rome. The play, Julius Caesar, explores what contributes rhetoric its power by putting Brutus's appeal against Mark Antony's. Shakespeare shows Antony's speech to be preferred since he has a compelling influence on the plebeians through pathos and logos.

Straightaway after Brutus's appeal, he made a critical mistake of neglecting Antony since he is a powerful orator that was able to manage and create a skillful speech in which he appeals to emotion. Antony begins by connecting to the public as "friends, Romans, [and] countrymen," and then continues to say how Caesar was a "friend, faithful and just" even weeping right after, needing to "pause till it comes back to me" (3.2.x). This excerpt highlights the immediate contrast between Brutus and Antony, as one greets the populace as friends first, rather than citizens. In fact, by using his skill with language and making public displays of his private emotions, the pauses in his speech theatrically illustrate that he is overcome with emotion and tears, allowing Antony to refute Brutus, that Caesar's death had a much more dramatic effect. …show more content…

This scene represents Antony's shrewdness, being able to seemingly respect the promises of the conspirators, but reminds the public of their love for Caesar, and simultaneously casting doubt on Brutus. Furthermore, Antony repeating Brutus's name numerous times suggests irony and dishonor

Open Document