On January 5, 2017 at approximately 1708 hours, Investigator Mems conducted a recorded interview with suspect, Brian Archa, at Pulaski County Criminal Investigations Division. Mr. Archa was read his Pulaski County Sheriff's Office Advice and Understanding of Rights Form. Mr. Archa acknowledged he understood his rights by indicating yes next to each and initialing. Mr. Archa then waived his rights and agreed to make a statement in reference to Forgery and Theft of Property at 37110 West 14th Street in Little Rock, AR (Mr. Archa residence). What follows is a summary of Mr. Archa’s statement. >>>>>>> Mr. Archa walked Investigator Mems through the residence where Mr. Archa pointed out a black bag with account information and check printing paper. Mr. Archa also pointed out a syringe with liquid substance in the back bedroom. …show more content…
Archa stated he told Investigator Mems that, Brian Archa was not his name due to him being scared. Investigator Mems confronted Mr. Archa with checks and credit cards observed inside his wallet during the search warrant of his residence. Mr. Archa admitted to credit cards and checks being inside his wallet which he received from “Tuck”. Mr. Archa stated one of the checks was for $220.00 dollars and the other check was for $600.00 dollars. Mr. Archa advised he had an ink pad at his residence which he placed his thumb print on one of the checks. Mr. Archa admitted to knowing the checks inside his wallet were stolen. Mr. Archa admitted he forged his name and dollar amount on the stolen
The news article that I decided to do my assignment on is about a bank manager, Debra Anne Chapin, that embezzled 2 million dollars from a bank. The news article’s title is, “Former manager jailed for cheating bank out of $2M; Woman used cash to pay bills, gamble and feed her cocaine habit.” The crime took place in Calgary between June 1, 2006 and June, 30 2008. This embezzlement is a classic case of white collar crime and demonstrates numerous criminological theories.
“I agree with Ms. Krejci that the entire file should have been disclosed with the publics record request, but that does not make it discoverable.” Feeney said. “I understand her frustration that she wasn 't given the same information that another defense attorney was. When I discovered what had happened, which was in august, I immediately requested the entire file from the Phoenix Police Department so that I could disclose it to the defense council. I didn’t do that because I believed that the information was discoverable or relevant. I did it as a professional courtesy. So that we were on the same field, and so that she felt that she had everything tha...
Well written procedures, rules, and regulation provide the cornerstone for effectively implementing policies within the criminal justice system. During the investigational process, evidence collected is subjected to policies such as Search and Seizure, yet, scrutinized by the Exclusionary Rule prior to the judicial proceeding. Concurrent with criminal justice theories, evidence collected must be constitutionally protected, obtained in a legal and authorized nature, and without violations of Due Process. Although crime and criminal activities occur, applicability of policies is to ensure accountability for deviant behaviors and to correct potentially escalation within social communities It is essential the government address such deviant behavior, however, equally important is the protection of the accused which also must become a priority when investigating criminal cases.
On Thursday, March 2, 2017, at 2:55 p.m., the investigator traveled to the following cities in the Riverside County area; Palm Springs, Cathedral City and to the Desert Hot Springs to conduct cold-calls with the witnesses who may have information about the Ronnie Curtis case. Each of the following witnesses, Ms. Mayla Padzik, Ms. Annette Reiz and Ms. Barbara have not returned any previous phone calls made to their listed phone numbers to secure their statements about claimant Ms. Curtis’s. In an attempt to locate and establish their identities to include their personal statements a thorough check was conducted through HUB’s services which additional addresses were discovered to follow-up with each one of the witnesses with this developed information.
On March 24, 2016, officers were dispatched to a scene where a male subject was trying to gain entry into a vehicle using a hammer. Upon arrival officers made contact with a male subject who was later identified as Keith Hunt, the defendant, and the victim. The victim explained to the officers she was standing near the trunk of her vehicle when Mr. Hunt approached, He attempted to keep into her vehicle without permission; so she confronted the defendant and tried to secure her vehicle. Mr. Hunt demanded she give him the keys and her wallet. The victim stated the defendant had a hammer in his hand and was threatening her with it while he was telling her to hand over the property. They began to struggle over the keys and the victim screamed
This case involves suspect Terrell Wilson gaining entrance into Okuno Agencies Office located at 35 N. Arroyo Parkway. Once inside the business, Wilson stole a Phillips Heart Defibrillator, serial #A17I-00442, valued at $1,300.00. Wilson left the scene in an unknwon direction. On 11/08/17, Wilson was contacted for an unrelated reason and was found to be in possession of the stolen Phillips Heart Defibrillator, serial #A17I-00442. Wilson was arrested PC 496 – Receiving Stolen Property.
The woman reported a rich visual image of one of the suspects as he brushed the hair from the front of his eyes. She then remembered specific details about his profile, which included a silver earring that he was wearing at the time of the incident.
through the back window that there was a yellow and black Dewalt work bag, which
I reviewed the video and confirmed Marion’s account of the event was accurate. The DVD was placed into evidence at PRPD and the property receipt was attached to this report. Marion provided me with a receipt showing the value of the fraudulent return. The receipt was attached to this supplement along with a written statement from Marion.
A divorce fraud case, Sands v. Sands, involves a misappropriation of assets, which involved the legal ramification of the husband losing 100% of the misappropriated assets and it being awarded to the wife including being held liable for seventy percent of the wife’s attorney fees due to the husband’s fraudulent acts discovered within the court proceedings. Divorce fraud is governed by state laws and considered the laws that preserve the rights of this case. The case does detail the evidence admitted or expert witness testimony; however, common evidence used under these circumstances as fraudulent documents include an analysis of household income, bank accounts statements, couple’s tax return, credit card statements, property appraisal and
The third concrete experience that was the most favourable was reading the case files on service users whom I wanted to know more about. I found this beneficial for my understanding of their needs, behaviours, characteristics and home life. Although I did not get to find out the type of intellectual disability, this supported my learning so that I could get to know service users better and link their behaviours so that I what seen during interactions. Additionally, I chose this experience because I gained a deeper understanding of their intellectual disability so that I could adapt my language (what words I spoke and how fast) so those service users could understand. For example, I learnt through the case files that client C had high anxiety. Therefore, I learnt to minimise confusion or stress client A could develop.
Andrew L.-T. Choo, Entrapment and Section 78 of Pace, The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 51, No. 2 (Jul., 1992), pp. 236-238
On the 14th of October 2017, I was asked by Miss Felicia McDonald at about 0900hrs to move to 613 for an investigative interview. During the interview, I was informed by Miss McDonald that the investigative interview was based on my failure to follow instruction on the 13th of October, 2017, an instruction that was given by Mr. Kenny Sanders, a 204B. After reading Mr. Sander's statement, I proceeded to inform Miss McDonald that the statement was false has the statement does not reflect what I told Mr. Sanders when I called my Cell phone nor did it reflect what I told him when he came to meet me on the route. Further, I informed Miss McDonald that on that day, I received a call from Mr. Sanders stating that he was instructed to bring me a Pivot off Route 706 hence he needed to know my location so he can bring the Pivot to me.
In this Case No. 11-2121. Parents of a child reported an incident in which they stated that their child had sexual intercourse with an adult male. This is a case between United States of America, Appellee, v. Darrin Roy ANDERSON, Appellant, in which they hold Anderson accountable of traveling with the intent to engage in illicit sexual conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b), to which Anderson pleaded guilty. The evidence retrieved in case 2 was the text, the photos and further investigations indicated that Anderson withdrew $200 on August 11, 2009, from a cash machine in Walhalla, North Dakota, where he worked. He withdrew another $200 from a cash machine in East Grand Forks, Minnesota, on August 12, 2009. Funds from the same account were used to pay for a room at the East Grand Inn on August 12, 2009. Facebook was used as a method to trick the defendant in thinking that the person he is communicating with is one of the adolescents he had sexual intercourse with. The two parties communicated back and forth and Anderson agreed on meeting up with M. R’s mother. The outcome was that Anderson actually had more than 800 private chats with more than 800 adolescent girls, this was after a search was launched by Detective Hajicek. Anderson was then found guilty and prisoned for 114 months. The result of this case is quite fair as there was sufficient evidence to prove that Anderson was internet
Legal Information Institute. (2010, August 9). Retrieved February 17, 2012, from Cornell University Law School: http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/criminal_law