Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literature review on employee engagement
An essay on employee engagement at work
Research paper on importance of employee engagement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literature review on employee engagement
Employee engagement is about productive attitudes and behaviours bringing about upgraded organization outcomes, in a way that they prompt and boost one another. Employee engagement is the emotional commitment the employees have to the company and its goals. This passionate engagement suggests engaged workers really care about their work and their company. They don’t work for a paycheck, or the next promotion, but on part of the company’s goals. As per a CEO of a business group, “To win in the marketplace you must initially win in the workplace.” Employee engagement is the key to activating a high operating workforce. As per occupational psychologists’, engagement has three elements: •vigour •dedication •absorption As per Business Schools, employee …show more content…
A new meta-analysis published in the Journal of Applied Psychology concluded that, “… employee satisfaction and engagement are related to meaningful business outcomes at a magnitude that is important to many organizations.” In simple words, Employee engagement is a method at organization resulting in the correct surroundings for all members of an organisation to give of their best each day, devoted to their organization’s goals and beliefs, motivated to contribute to organizational progress, with an enhanced feeling of their own well-being. • Employee engagement creates deeper promise from employees so fewer resign, sick leave reduces, casualty rates decrease, conflicts and grievances decline, outputivity increases for the employer. • Positive relationships are evidenced with profit, revenue growth, client satisfaction, productivity, innovation, crew retentiveness, competence and fitness and safety performance. • Engaged employees will be stronger advocates of their organisations and help protect the employer from the reputational risks related to poor function levels or merchandise …show more content…
• 72% of vastly engaged employees believe they can positively alter client service, compared to 27 % of the disengaged. • 68% of immensely engaged employees believe they can affect costs positively in their job or unit, versus just 19 % of the disengaged. Given the above-mentioned data, it is simple to interpret that companies that do an enhanced job of engaging their employees to outplay their competition. Employee engagement can not only make a real change, it can set the great organizations apart from the simply good ones. Jamie A. Grumana et. Al (2011) studied how many present-day organizations are placing a greater priority on their performance management structures through the medium of of generating bigger levels of job performance. They point that generating performance increments may be best reached by orienting the performance management structure to push employee
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
The workforce in collaboration with the executive team foster a high performance and align with their cycle of engagement which is comprised of setting clear objectives and goals, engaging the workforce to those goals, align the workforce to achieve those goal, transparent review of performance and open communication , listening continuously to the workforce, empower a setting to perform, improve and innovate, committing the workforce to grow and develop, frequent performance evaluations, recognizing , rewarding excellence and ensure that their performance aligns with the strategies of the organization. These evaluations are done yearly allow the workforce to incorporate themselves that wish to into high leadership positions and advance as their personal goal align with the organization's goal, thereby promoting growth within the organization and increasing and maintaining retention of the current workforce (MBNQA, 2018). Thereby incorporating the “CQI philosophy of meeting
It impacts the hospital’s prosperity and productivity immensely and if employee engagement is strong it results in a more productive workforce, higher job satisfaction and moral, higher retention, better skilled staff, lower absentee rates and better patient loyalty and satisfaction. Tameside hospital has aspects of their approach to staff engagement that have high performance rates (which they need to maintain) and aspects that were lower in performance which need drastic improvements to have a more productive hospital. Progressive staff engagement and development not only benefits the staff at the hospital but leads to a better experience and service for patients, which ultimately benefits the stakeholders and the organisation as a
A study conducted by BlessingWhite (2013) highlights five levels of employee engagement. The first level is the “engaged”. The engaged employee exhibits high contribution and high satisfaction, these employees find great satisfaction in their work, they are strongly committed to the organizations mission and goals, and have a positive impact on employee morale. The second level of employee engagement is the “almost engaged” having a medium level of job satisfaction and contribution. These employees are genuinely satisfied with their job and are considered top performers within the organization. The third level are considered “honeymooners and hamsters” these employees exhibit a high job satisfaction but low contribution levels. Honeymooners are considered newer employees and are seeking their role with the organization, while also seeking ways to contribute to the mission. Hamsters, on the other hand, are sincerely hard workers, however they routinely work non-value added task, therefore contributing little to the organization. Level four consist “crash and burners”. The “crash and burners” have a high contribution level but also exhibit a low level of job satisfaction. The “crash and burners” often complain about decisions made by upper level management as well as complain about
Slåtten, T., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2011). Antecedents and effects of engaged frontline employees: A study from the hospitality industry. Managing Service Quality, 21(1), 88-107.
Planning to Become an Employer of Choice It seems that most companies' leaders still appreciated the need to focus on talent acquisition and retention as a key imperative. As study reveals a great number of managers support the conclusion that the greatest drivers of employee engagement and retention are intangible - mostly related to the way a manager treats employees. In fact in reviewing the list of Engagement Practices, most of them are intangible and within the power of the manager to implement. In the end, it doesn't matter whether they are tangible or intangible.
This paper critically reviews MacLeod Report (2009), ‘Engaging for Success’ and analysis it’s suitability as an engagement model for the organisations to adapt. Also, this paper suggests an alternative engagement model, which can be applied and adopted by the organisation for achieving their strategic objectives.
In an employment era characterised by people-centric organisations, it is understandable that the concept of employee engagement has gained increased prominence. In theory, employees are motivated when given autonomy, self-confidence through feedback, respect from management, and freedom to take action without reprisal, which increases productivity and service levels (Macy, 2009:12-13). Unfortunately, despite this conceptual ideal, contemporary research and practitioner studies continue to demonstrate that there is a lacuna between the theory of employee engagement and the reality of it in day-to-day businesses. According to a recent report, The State of Employee Engagement, published by Smith and Henderson, only one third of businesses focus
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Rich, B., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
However, a study by Gallup shows that there only 13% employees worldwide are being engaged and the worrying concern is that companies are clueless why the majority are not engaged (Gallup, 2017). Employee engagement is not about employee satisfaction and should regarded as a continuous effort an organization must understand and undertake (Kelleher,
Today businesses believe that the sustaining of performance and competitive advantage to becoming a great organization. As an organization’s success depends on their employees’ performance, the value of specific individual employee has played an important role within an organization to be competitive. At that time, the value of each and individual employee and their satisfaction with their jobs are one of the key factors for an organization and organizations need to find ways to improve employee job satisfaction to achieve organizational goals.
Employee performance defines the individual performance and behavior. It is essential to understand that performance is not merely a tasks and work need to be done to receive bonus or pay increase. Main objective is to enhance the skills set of an individual while helping the business performance (Baker, 1999).
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...