History Essay Rough Draft

853 Words2 Pages

Warfare between two parties has always been a major catalyst of world history today. Specifically, Word War I had many dictators and world leaders that were not satisfied with the way things had played out, including Hitler, dictator of Germany. World War I began during 1914, and was between the Allied Forces and Axis Forces. It was the result of tension building up in the European front for decades prior to WWI. However, although Germany was punished terribly for WWI, it did not stop her from joining forces with Italy and Japan. These three powerful countries took action against the rest of the world, beginning in 1939, and initiated WWII. The League of Nations, designed to keep peace between the European fronts, failed to do its job. Therefore, the main reason world was plunged into World War II in 1939 was because of the League of Nations’ failure to act promptly. This brings to light that the effective response to aggression is collective security, and not appeasement. World War II broke up the western European front due to the League of Nations. The League of Nations was simply not able to respond in a timely manner in response to the aggressors. Cited in the “World War Two – Causes” packet, the League of Nations was not able to act quickly because they only met a total of four times in one year. Also, the entire League had to agree on a topic. Another reason that WWII was started by the League of Nations is because the League had no way of enforcing their power. The League had no army; therefore they were not able to protect themselves and were also not able to enforce the rules they all agreed on. Therefore, in Germany’s eyes, the League of Nations was not even a threat to her bigger plan. Although the Leagu... ... middle of paper ... ...urope’s Allied Forces’ problems. These documents show that the League of Nations was responsible for WWII because they did not take threats seriously and did not respond to the problems quickly enough. However, instead of appeasement, collective security was the answer to quell Hitler. The League of Nations was not an effective solution to the arguing and warfare that broke out during the early 20th century. Also, appeasement did nothing for the Allied Forces, and Germany had gained a lot of both land and power than if the Allies had not chosen to try and win Hitler over. Collective security successfully defeated Hitler and the Nazi party for the Allied Forces, and also got rid of Hitler’s influences all over the European front. WWII was an overall success for the Allied Forces due to collective security methods in place, in order to obliterate the Nazi Party.

Open Document