Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of adversity in our lives long essay
Role of adversity in our lives long essay
Role of adversity in our lives long essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of adversity in our lives long essay
The paradoxical connection between suffering and happiness is one that leaves room for various interpretations of the relationship. To suffer is to experience a feeling contrary to happiness, but one must suffer in order to know what happiness truly is. Suffering allows people to develop certain qualities that will ultimately make them happier. People who have suffered have been subjected to circumstances that are otherwise unfathomable, such as: witnessing the stark contrast between pleasure and pain, and facing circumstances that they cannot simply escape from, both of which allow them to develop qualities that make them happier in the long run. Happiness and general pleasure inducing experiences alone cannot make one happy. Happiness is …show more content…
Suffering allows people to see the contrast between pleasure and pain. Findings in a study conducted by Phillip Brickman, Ronnie Janoff-Bulman and Dan Coates, “Lottery Winners and Accident Victims: Is Happiness Relative?” states “Individuals [will] enhance the relative value of their own outcome by comparing it with the less fortunate other, whereas [in a group where everyone is equal], there would be no such comparison to elevate their appreciation of their standing” (151). This is true not just for comparison from person to person, but also between past events and the present. Daniel Nettle’s article “Comfort and Joy” states “Happiness stems from the subsequent processes that compared the pain [one] went through with the pain [they] expected or had experienced [previously]” (21). The amount or the intensity of suffering a person has endured shapes their happiness. The relativity of overall happiness allows the person to see their current situation as much better than it was during the time when they were facing hardships. In his …show more content…
Suffering is not something that one can choose to, or choose not to partake in. To continue living day to day in a state of suffering is not easy. Not being able to escape from the suffering obligates the person to learn to work hard to get past the low points in life. A significant factor contributing to happiness is a sense of accomplishment. People are happier when they feel like their efforts are making a change and that their diligence is worth something. Suffering through difficult parts of life increases a person’s contentment with themselves and with their life, as they feel like they have overcome something they thought they were incapable of. For instance, in the article “Beyond Money” by Ed Diener and Martin E.P. Seligman, it is stated that “Some people consider paid work to be an unpleasant activity that must be suffered in order to earn money. Research, however, indicates that people obtain pleasure from their jobs” (45). Having endured through hardships in order to get to a better place in life makes people feel like they are worthy of being happy as they have worked hard to get where they are- that they are capable of more. Happiness is not solely a result of the end product, but rather the journey, and suffering provides a journey to embark on, to find
suffering hurts man spirit is does more good then constant happiness and power. We have to beat
In “Happiness and Its Discontents” Daniel M.Haybron describes the relationship between pain and happiness. Put simply, pain doesn 't bring happiness,happiness comes from within.
Suffering is apart of life, just like joy and love is. We can never choose how life treats us but we can always choose how we react and get back up again. Through Fever 1793 we see up close and personal how suffering can affect us, and how sometimes it can affect us in positive ways. How suffering can help turn the page to the next chapter in our lives. How suffering doesn’t always mean losing but also gaining.
“Be happy… not because everything is good, but because you can see the good in everything” is a quote that is used quite often when referring to happiness. This quote fits in really well with the literature that we have been reading, especially when reading Until They Bring The Streetcars Back by Stanley Gordon West, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Harriet A. Jacobs, The Crucible by Arthur Miller, and lastly Of Mice And Men by John Steinbeck. The reason this quote fits in well is because The literature of our course suggests that one may experience more happiness by helping others, rather than themselves.
In Cause of Suffering, everyone craves a lust for satisfaction, whether it is hunger, power, or entertainment. We never forget the thirst for attentiveness as it becomes repetitive until the thirst subsides for a while. For this reason,
The question of suffering comes up much when talking about, or practicing any religion. Many ask why people suffer, and what causes suffering? The various religions try to answer these questions in their own way. Pico Iyer’s editorial, “The Value of Suffering” addresses the questions of suffering and how it is handled. This article could be compared to the Bhagavad-Gita which also addresses and explains suffering through different stories of the interactions of humans and different Gods. One can specifically look at “The Second Teaching” in the Bhagavad-Gita, which explains the interaction between a man named Arjuna and the god Krishna. In it Arjuna is suffering because he does not want to fight in a war and with people whom he should be worshiping. Krishna says to fight because the souls of the people will forever live on, and because he needs to fulfill his Dharma. With what is known about the Bhagavad-Gita and how Iyer thinks about the subject, Iyer would agree with how the Bhagavad-Gita address suffering.
Despite its prevalence, suffering is always seen an intrusion, a personal attack on its victims. However, without its presence, there would never be anyway to differentiate between happiness and sadness, nor good and evil. It is encoded into the daily lives people lead, and cannot be avoided, much like the prophecies described in Antigone. Upon finding out that he’d murdered his father and married his mother,
This is one of the reasons why humans do not normally imagine themselves living a hard future but a simple one. Therefore, we try to avoid feeling or thinking about pain as it is prefered to live a life without it. Even so, in order to try to stay away from it, we need to understand ourselves and the cause of our pain. All of us tend to search for happiness but sadness disturbs it. Could we consider happiness as happiness if we did not feel pain at all? or Could we be happy if we had not experienced pain at all?. Despite reasoning that happiness comes from pain and vice versa, we can’t avoid asking ourselves about the point and purpose of suffering. Does it makes us better people? Does it helps us to empathize when someone is going through a painful situation?. Sadness is our answer to pain and we can overcome sadness over time. But pain is always there although at some moments it becomes less of a burden for ourselves and unnoticeable for other people when we are experiencing joy. Sadness can’t be hidden, pain can. We learn to live with it and if we don’t accept it the pain conquers and defeats us. If we could not
Epicurus provides some great ideas towards what constitutes happiness and ‘the good life’ that can be applied to many facets of life, however I believe some aspects must be further contemplated to find a more infallible theory. The view that one can only feel pleasure in the absence of pain seems to be one that is very black and white and does not seem to take in the intricacies of modern society. Fundamentally, the pursuit of certain pleasures and the minimisation of pain would likely result in happiness, however a mild dosing of the contrary could also contribute to ‘happiness and the good life’.
In the realm of moral ethics, happiness is a key principle towards a self-fulfilling life. Inspired by the foundation of ethics since the days of Ancient philosopher such as Aristotle, Utilitarianism began at the rise of prominent British 19th-century thinkers of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Both thinkers of classical utilitarianism divide Utilitarianism analyzed today by as Act and Rule Utilitarianism. In short, Utilitarianism is subjected to its morality to be based of pleasure over pain principles as their unhappiness and happiness scale defined as “Greatest happiness for the greatest numbers.”1
The week 3 material on the Stoic ethics raised the issue about righteous and wicked people and whether or not they experience happiness. From the reading, Plato describes that only the righteous person who is being tortured is happier than the wicked person who is prosperous. Additionally from this reading, Aristotle believed that a person who is suffering the greatest misfortune is happy as one that no one would defend who was not arguing for the sake of argument. Before this week’s material I wouldn’t have t...
One major problem with decreasing suffering is that you cannot appreciate the good without the bad (Power, “The End of Suffering”). It is very important to go through struggles in order to fully appreciate good times, and be truly happy when things are going well. Good times would not truly feel amazing if they occurred all of the time. It has also been suggested that a
There is something all of us wanted, to obtain happiness, but how? Now, my topic here is gratefulness and gratitude. Gratitude, or grateful, is the quality of being thankful; readiness to show appreciation for and to return kindness. What is the connection between happiness and gratefulness? Well, many people would say, when you are happy, you are grateful. However, think about this again. Is it really the happy people that are grateful? We all know quite a number of people. For example greedy, avarice, and rich who have everything that it would take to be happy, and they are not happy, because they want something else or they want more of the same. On the other hand, people who suffered from great misfortunes, misfortunes that we will never want in our life, are deeply happy. Why?
If existence is inherently filled with suffering, what follows? For Schopenhauer, what follows is a life not worth living. Nietzsche disagrees. Although Nietzsche accepts that life is suffering, he does not accept Schopenhauer’s nihilistic conclusion. In The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche attempts to overcome Schopenhauer’s nihilism by appealing to the ancient Greeks. But before explaining the Greek’s response to the suffering, it is important to further explain Schopenhauer’s response. Schopenhauer argues that the source of suffering is what he calls the will or what is more commonly understood as desire. If we don’t get what we want, then we are in pain. If we do get what we want, then we become bored. Either way, we suffer. To end this suffering, Schopenhauer recommends denying the will. By living an ascetic life, one is no longer controlled by the will. Thus, one no longer suffers.
I believe that happiness is the key to living a good and prosperous life. Through all of the sadness and hate in the world, happiness gives me hope. It gives not only me, but others hope and joy. Happiness gives us something to hold onto, therefore we cherish it as much as we can.