French Monarchy Vs Absolute Monarchy

Throughout the history of France and England, the monarchy ruled supreme for centuries. Each monarchy encased its own individual characteristics, but it also shared several specific traits. The monarchy varied from king to king, but in general both countries were ran the same way with each passing king. In the end, it will be clear to see that though they have both have their differences. Maybe their countries were more alike than we thought.

The largest difference between the two monarchies, is at the base of it. In France, each king chose to rule with an absolute monarchy. This in short means that the king had absolute power, and that he could not be questioned by anyone or any authority he had appointed. He was allowed to do what ever he pleased, to levy taxes, pass laws, and had direct control of all his subjects within his state. On the other hand, England went with a constitutional monarchy. Although this did not always play out, England's original ruling was to eliminate the destruction

In France, the people were oppressed, violated, and disregarded. They were no longer citizens of the state of France, they were simply subjects to the crown. Their absolute monarchy transitioned to that of a tyranny. Sadly, when Parliament lost power in England this exact incident occurred. As discussed previously, Parliament longed for a constitutional monarchy to avoid disaster. But exactly like France, the constitutional monarchy transitioned to an absolute monarchy, and then from that formed a tyranny. Starting at James I and ending at James II, the English monarchy was not what they had long desired for it to be. Many were tyrant rather than kings, and several even dismissed Parliament in order to escape the possibility of them being question and maybe even removed. Obviously, these two countries are more alike than would appear at first