As the corporate world evolve over time, major business dominates our global food system. A portion of large corporations control an abundant of the production, distribution, processing, marketing, and retailing of food. This concentration of power enables major businesses to annihilate competition and dictate tough terms to their suppliers. It restrains farmers and communities from earning a stock to prevent hunger and poverty. Within this system, portions of people are striving to survive hunger and other portions of people are overweight. Food sovereignty is a movement that is slowly innovate the food world and quickly becoming a major issue we cannot ignore. Although the differences between food sovereignty and food security is huge, both …show more content…
ends share one common goal, to provide organic and health food for the communities. Among the many definitions of what food sovereignty is, my definition of food sovereignty is similar to the general definition.
My definition of food sovereignty is that it is a movement to create the opportunities for people to utilize the power of nature and communities to appropriately produce their own agriculture, fishing, and food policies through a safe and organic manner. According to Why Hunger’s blog Lydia quoted on Pedal&Plow, “food sovereignty is the right of peoples, communities and countries to define their own policies regarding their seeds, agriculture, labor, food and land. These policies must be appropriate to their unique ecological, social, economic, and cultural circumstances. Food Sovereignty includes the true right to food and to produce food (Pedal).” I completely agree with the definition, not only because of what it defined was true, but also because it is what exactly what needed to be done in order to give communities a chance to create something of their …show more content…
own. In addition to the definition of Food Sovereignty, there are six pillars incorporated to Food Sovereignty to further expand on the idea.
The first pillar is the “focuses on food for people (Pedal).” This pillar builds on the importance of food to the community. As mentioned earlier, as the market world become stronger and bigger, food is becoming to treated as a capital, a source of trade. However, food is a necessity. It is a source to keep communities alive and healthy instead of “[a] commodity to be traded or speculated on for profit (Pedal).” The second pillar is “Value food providers (Pedal).” This pillar protects food providers’ authority to survive and be employed with self-respect. The third pillar is “localizes food systems (Pedal).” This pillar symbols the local and regional provision that takes precedence over supplying distant markets. The fourth pillar is “puts control locally (Pedal).” This pillar gives authority to communities in operating their food and resources, as well as, “places control over territory, land, grazing, water, seeds, livestock and fish populations under local food providers and respects their rights (Pedal).” The fifth pillar is “builds knowledge and skills (Pedal).” It is a pillar that teaches food providers to utilize technologies and skills to better the agricultural processes and localized food systems. The last pillar is “works with nature (Pedal).” This last pillar protects the green world around the communities to avoid any damage
to the health of those inhabit it. Under these pillars, Food Sovereignty is a vision to make the localized food system a system everyone in the community can depend on. Food security is like running for president in high school. When one runs for president, one makes many different promises to the whole that one cannot keep once one become one in order to take a lead on the votes. Compared to food security, the definition may sound hopeful, but the society does not follow the definition legitimately. “Food security exists when all people, at times, have access to sufficient, safe, and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (Pedal).” The definition of food security may sound promising but it is not necessarily safe and nutritious. As technology advances, genetically modified organic food begin to increase food production. However, “farming communities experience decreases in diversity of crops and biodiversity of plant and animal species, increases in pollution of water sources, and decreases in soil fertility through such hard and unvaried use, which further increases dependency on fertility inputs, again often chemical (Pedal).” According to Global Food Politics, “food security is more of a technical concept, and the right to food a legal one, food sovereignty is essentially a political concept (Global).” Food security is different from food sovereignty. Food security expand the opportunities to provide food for the communities, whereas food sovereignty synthesizes chances to grow healthier, organic food and shape valid terms for the communities. Baltimore city is almost like a diamond in the rough because as the area is diseased with poverty and crime, “[it is] a place where poverty existed alongside great wealth (House 60).” Nonetheless, there are possibilities and recommendations to alter the nightmare into something great. In 2013, Mayor Rawlings-Blake strategized a plan that will aim to increase access to healthier, more affordable foods throughout the city. Under this initiative, “Food Depot serves as a model, hiring on-site registered dietitian and nutritionist, Sheryl Hoehner, to work with the community and shoppers in cooking demonstrations, taste tests, community engagement and educational outreach (Grillo).” Ultimately, food sovereignty is a requirement to start a new page for urban communities in order to acquire fresh and healthy food supply. Even though food sovereignty and food security share a common goal, food security only ensure the abundance of food sources but dismiss the healthiness of them. Food sovereignty “emphasizes local control and self-sufficiency, while food security emphasizes reliance on the global economy based on liberalized agricultural markets (Global).”
companies struggle to maintain their autonomy in the food chain and inform what kind of
Walsh, Bryan. “America’s Food Crisis.” NEXUS. Eds. Kim and Michael Flachmann. Boston: Pearson, 2012. 166 – 173. Print.
The book The No-Nonsense Guide to World Food, by Wayne Roberts introduces us to the concept of “food system”, which has been neglected by many people in today’s fast-changing and fast-developing global food scene. Roberts points out that rather than food system, more people tend to recognize food as a problem or an opportunity. And he believes that instead of considering food as a “problem”, we should think first and foremost about food as an “opportunity”.
In Raj Patel’s novel Stuffed and Starved, Patel goes through every aspect of the food production process by taking the experiences of all the people involved in food production from around the world. Patel concludes by eventually blaming both big corporations and governments for their critical role in undermining local, cultural, and sustainable foodways and in so doing causing the key food-related problems of today such as starvation and obesity. In this book of facts and serious crime, Patel's Stuffed and Starved is a general but available analysis of global food struggles that has a goal of enlightening and motivating the general Western public that there is something critically wrong with our food system.
Stuffed and Starved brings to light the uneven hourglass shape that exists within our world’s food system, and describes what factors contribute to these discrepancies. It begins with the decisions farmers are forced to make on the farm, and ends with the decisions the consumers are able to make at the grocery stores. The purpose of Stuffed and Starved was to describe what factors attribute to the hourglass shape of the food system. Author Raj Patel points out who is profiting and who is suffering in this system, and gives insight as to how the system may be improved.
Our current system of corporate-dominated, industrial-style farming might not resemble the old-fashioned farms of yore, but the modern method of raising food has been a surprisingly long time in the making. That's one of the astonishing revelations found in Christopher D. Cook's "Diet for a Dead Planet: Big Business and the Coming Food Crisis" (2004, 2006, The New Press), which explores in great detail the often unappealing, yet largely unseen, underbelly of today's food production and processing machine. While some of the material will be familiar to those who've read Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" or Eric Schlosser's "Fast-Food Nation," Cook's work provides many new insights for anyone who's concerned about how and what we eat,
While the majority of the information provided by Patel and his subsequent opinions are rather bleak, there are a few rays of hope. He calls his readers to action and encourages them to arrange and regain control of the food system. One way to do this he argues is through the fair trade movement idea. Even with the corporations, supermarkets, and shareholders working against the interest of the common man, Patel believes that people can right this grievous wrong and fight back. But only if we are politically hungry enough.
The approach targets the adoption of the indigenous knowledge, values, and wisdom in the food production and agricultural activities in the modern world. However, the Canadian movement on Food Sovereignty does not insist on the traditional food production methods but targets on the use of the modern technology in food production to ensure food security through increased productivity (Raj, 2009). Additionally, the aim of the indigenous food sovereignty approach is to ensure that the food production systems remain natural and consider all the ecosystem factors. Such considerations aim at ensuring the production of safe and healthy foods as compared to the Canadian movement that does not mostly consider the health factor in the food production
The world that we live in is inevitably problem stricken. There will always be a challenge that we are given to overcome, may that be a natural disaster, war, poverty, hunger, etc. As a whole we need to come together to find a ‘solution’ for all of these issues that are so detrimental to this world and those living in it. Some may be more preventative than the others, however, we must work together in times of distress to rebuild. I will be addressing the problem of hunger and food insecurity in America. Food security is define by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) as access by all people at all time to enough food for an active, healthy life. On the other hand, food insecurity is outlined very well by the National Research Council.
Gathering information and literature on this discipline will help us understand how we can solve the problem. Agriculture plays a major role in the issue of world hunger today. In the article “How a Global Network of Farmers Can Help End Hunger”, many very important issues surrounding that particular role agriculture plays in world hunger are discussed (Bread for the World Institute and Foods Resource Bank). In the article, the author’s discuss just how important the role of farmer’s are in the world hunger problem (Bread for the World Institute and Foods Resource Bank). The farmers are the ones who produce all the grains, vegetables and protein that we need in our lives to sustain a healthy lifestyle, and in fact they do produce enough of those food groups to feed the entire planet (Bread for the World Institute and Foods Resource Bank).
Many people here in America are hardworking and resourceful, but an insecure economy can have a long-lasting effect on a diverse group of people. One of the greatest manifestations of this is the inability to consistently afford a healthy diet. In a report by done by researchers in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, ‘in 2011, 14.9 percent or 17.9 million people in America were food insecure (Coleman-Jensen, Nordic, Andrews, & Carlson, 2012).’ Although many different organizations such as the “Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program,” or the SNAP food stamp program has set out to eradicate hunger, by giving assistance to low income participants, to help them afford food, it does still exist in many different people’s lives, at one point or another. While many other underdeveloped countries have harder times with hunger, many of them, due to socioeconomic difficulties, hunger still causes many problems for different people in America.
We live in an age in which we have come to expect everything to be instantaneously at our fingertips. We live in an age of instant coffee, instant tea, and even instant mashed potatoes. We can walk down the street at 5 in the morning and get a gallon of milk or even a weeks worth of groceries at our discretion. Even though it is great that food is now readily available at all times, this convenience comes at a price, for both the producer and the consumer. Farmers are cheated out of money and are slaves to big business, workers and animals are mistreated. And, because food now comes at a low cost, it has become cheaper quality and therefore potentially dangerous to the consumer’s health. These problems surrounding the ethics and the procedures of the instantaneous food system are left unchanged due to the obliviousness of the consumers and the dollar signs in the eyes of the government and big business. The problem begins with the mistreatment and exploitation of farmers.
There are many problems confronting our global food system. One of them is that the food is not distributed fairly or evenly in the world. According “The Last Bite Is The World’s Food System Collapsing?” by Bee Wilson, “we are producing more food—more grain, more meat, more fruits and vegetables—than ever before, more cheaply than ever before” (Wilson, 2008). Here we are, producing more and more affordable food. However, the World Bank recently announced that thirty-three countries are still famine and hungers as the food price are climbing. Wilson stated, “despite the current food crisis, last year’s worldwide grain harvest was colossal, five per cent above the previous year’s” (Wilson, 2008). This statement support that the food is not distributed evenly. The food production actually increased but people are still in hunger and malnutrition. If the food were evenly distributed, this famine problem would’ve been not a problem. Wilson added, “the food economy has created a system in w...
Food insecurity defined, is ‘the state of being without reliable access to a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food’ (Oxforddictionaries.com, 2014). This in turn leads to hunger, which can have three possible meanings; 1) ‘the uneasy or painful sensation caused by want of food; craving appetite, also the exhausted condition caused by want of food’, 2) ‘the want or scarcity of food in a country’, and 3) ‘a strong desire or craving’ (Worldhunger.org, 2014). Food insecurity also leads to malnutrition, with 870 million people in the world or one in eight, suffering from chronic undernourishment (Fao.org, 2014). From this alarmingly high figure, 852 million of these people live in developing countries, making it evident that majority of strategies used to solve this problem should be directed at them (Fao.org, 2014). The world produces enough food to feed everyone, with an estimated amount of 2,720 Kcal per person a day (Worldhunger.org, 2014). The only problem is distri...
This can not be done with the same ineffective tactics that were used in the past, so that’s why people are developing new ways to eradicate hunger. When the Second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2) was held, they discussed the nutrition component and how important it is that it is not overlooked. By paying attention to nutrient-dense foods and recognizing the different entry points for improving nutrition, the ICN2 argues the world will be one step closer in achieving the Sustainable Development Goal. Some of the entry points they discussed include “the promotion of crop diversification…, strengthening local food production and processing, and exploring regulatory or voluntary instruments for promoting healthy diets” (goals 2). Promoting the nutrition aspect of the goal can help achieve it because nutrients are what keep people alive and