Feminist Criticism Of Medea

1390 Words3 Pages

Euripides’ play, Medea, is an ambiguous narrative relating to self-serving feminism. Depending on one’s viewpoint, the title character can either be one of the most unconventional delegates of women’s rights or an oblivious saboteur willing to undermine the cause. With all factors from the play taken into account, signs point toward the former. Medea was a pioneer of feminism, acting as a driving force behind breaking the stereotypes assigned to women. Despite being a foreigner and having a questionable moral compass, Medea succeeds in being a benefactress even if it wasn’t the goal she had in mind.
Medea is a dysfunctional and unorthodox character yet she’s still able to stand as a virtually perfect caricature of a feminist. According to Nigerian author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, a “feminist” can be defined as “a person who believes in the social, political and economic equality …show more content…

The act of murder is abhorrent in itself, although even more so when it’s your own children. However these wouldn’t have been the first murders Medea’s taken part in having previously killed both Glauce and Creon. Medea demonstrated through these murders that she greatly lacks a sense of morality. The Nurse often commented on Medea’s practicality and logic throughout the Greek tragedy in quotes such as “[Medea] hates her sons […] I dread to think of what is hatching in her mind. (1)” and “Why make the sons share in their father 's guilt? (20-21)”. The Nurse had the sensibility that Medea lacked. Even if Medea’s actions can be somewhat rationalized or explained, murdering her kids is unjustifiable. Through these murders, Medea demonstrated that each sex is equally capable of being a horrible person, therefore, acting as a form of equality. These acts of Medea’s have only served a self-benefiting purpose, thus linking back to her being a self-serving

More about Feminist Criticism Of Medea

Open Document