Dicey described the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty as: ‘The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty mean neither more nor less than this, namely that Parliament thus defined has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever: and further, that no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament.’1
According to Dicey, ‘parliament has total power. It is sovereign’2
. Parliament is seen as the highest form of law within the British constitutional structure and the supreme legal authority in the UK which is not subject to any limitations and the UK courts are bound to apply and interpret an Act of Parliament and have no power to declare laws passed by the Parliament invalid. In contrast to the UK, the legislature is limited in law-making in the United States as the US Supreme Court can declare laws passed by the
Parliament to be unconstitutional and therefore invalid.
Dicey identified three principal elements of the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty: The first is that
Parliament is the supreme law-making body; there is no limit on the subject matter on which Parliament can make laws, even if Parliament were to make laws that most people would regard it highly improper, no institution can hold the Act of Parliament invalid as explained in Madzimbamuto v Lardner – Burke3
.
The second element is that no institution or body can question the validity of an Act of Parliament including courts; they cannot declare a statute invalid as seen in British Railways Board v Pickin4 however a statue can overturn a judicial decision as witnessed in the case of Burmah Oil Co Ltd v Lord Advocate5
.
The third element is that P...
... middle of paper ...
...ion, an Act of Parliament So in order for Community law to become part of the United Kingdom’s domestic law, it had to be incorporated by legislation, under the authority of an Act of Parliament. This Act of Parliament, The European Communities Act 1972, made
European Union law a part of the UK system. Due to this new Community law introduction, it can be argued that Parliament cannot remain the supreme law-making body of the United Kingdom.
Section 2 (1) of The European Communities Act 1972 provides that ‘all such rights and obligations from time to time created or arising by or under the Treaties, and all such remedies and procedures from time to time provided for under the Treaties, as in accordance with the Treaties are without further enactment to be given legal effect’.8
This section permits law from the European Union to be directly applicable within
“The Parliament shall, subject to the Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to: (xxi) Marriage: (xxii) Divorce and matrimonial causes; and relation thereto, parental rights and the custody and guardianship of inf...
an Act of Parliament, a court ruling or an EU law in comparison to the
... idea of Parliamentary Sovereignty: The Controlling Factor of Legality in the British Constitution’ (2008) OJLS 709.
all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or may they act by representatives, freely and
in the way of the home rule bill due to the fact that the House of
On one hand, political constitutionalists argue that parliamentary sovereignty is the underlying principle in the British constitution as power and law making are bo...
Although Parliament does not usually make law, it has the important role of scrutinising Bills. This involves close inspection and proposed amendments made by both the House of Commons and the House of
In conclusion it seems that the traditional view of parliamentary sovereignty as purported by Dicey is no longer an immutable part of our constitution. Although it remains a key principle of our constitution, it has now been reinterpreted in light of seminal cases such as Factortame and Jackson, from a legally unchangeable, rule of our constitution, to one in which Parliament is no longer prevented from placing limits to the content and form of itself.
The strict supremacy of statute over judicial decisions and a tradition of literalism in statutory interpretation, 2. Where no legislation exists, the courts are bound by the doctrine of precedent in accordance with a strict hierarchy of judicial authority, 3. In the absence of a relevant precedent, the judges will be guided by legal principle and reasoning by analogy, and 4. There is a clear way of distinguishing the ratio of a case. A key feature of the unwritten constitution is ‘the separation of powers’.
The concept of parliamentary political system was rooted in 1707 of Great Britain; the word derives from ‘parley’, a discussion. It was used to describe meetings between Henry III and noblemen in the Great Council (Szilagyi, 2009). It was originated in British political system and is often known as the Westminster model as it was used in the Palace of Westminster. It became influential throughout many European nations later in the 18th century (Smith, 2010). Countries with parliamentary systems are either constitutional monarchies such as the United Kingdom, Denmark, Australia, and Canada or parliamentary republics such as Greece, India, Ireland and Italy (McTeer, 1995). The parliamentary type of government is known for its three distinctive features; first, executive is divided into the head of state and the head of government, they are independently elected forming a dual executive; second, the fusion of ...
Judicial review seeks to enforce and uphold constitutional doctrines which govern the UK’s uncodified constitution by scrutinising administrative action. One constitutional function of judicial review is to enforce the rule of law. It can be argued, in defining the rule of law as “negative value...designed to minimised the harm to freedom and dignity which the law may cause in its pursuit of its goals” Joseph Raz characterised judicial review. The principle of which states the executive is to be ruled by the law and subject to it.
Accessed 16/03/2012. http://www.law201.co.uk/95.pdfaccessed on 16/03/2012. http://www.oup.com/uk/orc/bin/9780199219742/01student/mindmaps/loveland_mindmaps_royal_prerogative.pdfaccessed on 17/03/2012. http://www.justice.gov.uk/royal-prerogative.pdf accessed on 17/03/2012. http://www.justice.gov.uk/royal-prerogative.pdf accessed on 18/03/2012.
The meaning of English Legal System is stated out by Cownie and Bradley in the English Legal System book . There are many sources that build up the English Law as it is today. The main sources of English Law consist of Common Law, parliamentary legislation and delegated legislation. As stated in Gary Slapper & David Kelly’s English Legal System book , there are many different interpretations of the phrase ‘source of law’ where in this book the law is made up of three main sources; where in Martin Hunt’s “A” Level Law , though there are different sources that make up the English law, these sources are differentiated in two main categories with various minor sources.
The rule of law is thought to be one of the most fundamental doctrines of the constitution of the whole of the United Kingdom. The distinctive UK‘s constitution has influences previously on the judicial system too. Government and the legal systems in history have both been involved in rules and discretion and most of all the elimination of all discretionary power in which both of these are impossible and unwanted. The rule of law means in one sense, government by the law but obviously government is by the people as well as by the law. As soon as the governing people are added in, the government can’t then be by law on there own. Although the situation is not undoubtedly as the making of particular laws can be guided by open and relatively stable general laws that have been made. For the Rule of Law to have meaning in a democratic society, it has to mean that those who run it have comply with it for it to work; there must be no room for an “ends justifies the means”
is the House of Commons a law-maker in the true sense of the word. The