Engineering Ethics

1271 Words3 Pages

Roller coasters come in all sizes and configurations. Roller coasters are designed to be intense machines that get the riders’ adrenaline pumping. Ever since my first roller coaster ride, I knew I was hooked. I cannot get enough of the thrilling sensation caused by these works of engineering. When people board these rides, they put their faith in the engineers who designed the rides and the people who maintain and operate the rides. In this paper, I will bring to your attention a specific instance when the operation of one of these coasters came into question and led to a very tragic incident. From this, I will look into the events leading up to the incident and evaluate the decisions made by the people involved. During late 2013, in Arlington, Texas, a family of three stood in line at the popular amusement park called Six Flags. The family was raring to ride the rollercoaster deemed the tallest steel hybrid coaster in the world named the Texas Giant. Once it was their turn to board the coaster, the family members loaded into the carts and were advised to lower the lap bar and listen for it to click. When they did so, the mother, known to media as Rosa Esparza, noticed that her lap bar only clicked once. Concerned for her safety, she caught the attention of the ride attendant and asked if she was secure. He proceeded to tell her “as long as she heard it click she was fine.” The coaster then was clear for take off. The coaster made its way to the top of the first hill, and as the cart descended and turned the first corner, Rosa was thrown from the cart. Rosa dropped out of the cart onto a metal support beam more than 75 feet below the place where she was ejected and came to rest on top of the roof of a tunnel. When the famil... ... middle of paper ... ...e to occur, people would still ride the coaster and could easily get hurt, especially if this decision was combined with decision 1. This would end up compromising the general desire for happiness and would be self-defeating. Since the public would be hurt, they would not be happy; and since the public would not want the possibility of getting injured, they would most likely not ride the ride, which would hurt the park. This decision would be determined to be unethical. In conclusion, the many decisions leading to the accident caused lots of pain and unhappiness to the public and the family of Rosa Esparza. After the accident, the park retracted their initial desire for only the lap bar. A harness was added as an extra precaution. In the future, I hope that coaster engineers everywhere can learn from this tragedy and create safe coasters for everyone’s enjoyment.

Open Document