Dopey's Legacy Disney Summary

791 Words2 Pages

Schwartz, Karen, Zana Lutfiyya, and Nancy Hansen. “Dopey’s Legacy: Stereotypical Portrayals of Intellectual Disability in the Classic Animated Films” Diversity in Disney Films: Critical Essays on Race, Ethnicity, Gender, Sexuality and Disability. Cheu, Johnson, ed. McFarland, 2013. Print. The authors examine how the roles with intellectual disabilities in Disney animated movies are described and how they are linked to ways through with people with intellectual disabilities are treated in realistic world. Concentrating on the stereotypies used in Disney movies to depict characters with mental disabilities, their main claim that the portrayals of those stereotypies in Disney films are imbedded with prejudicial assumptions and reinforced in a …show more content…

To prove this sub-claim, they first analyze the figure of Dopey the seventh dwarf in Snow White. Their evidence is that the producer consider Dopey“not as an elf or as an innocent or as a child but as a ‘human with dog mannerisms and intellect’” (203). They also find evidence in the movie as the outlooking and behaviors of Dopey are just like a dog. The second sub-claim is that Dopey was depicted as the “other”. Their evidence is that Dopey is always the one who is left behind when being chased and pushed forward when there are dangers ahead, which proves that Dopey is the most dispensable character. The third sub-claim is that the movie depicts Dopey to be incompetent as he always fails to accomplish the simplest tasks at work. Gus in Cinderella and Lefou in Beauty and the beast are also analyzed in the same way by the authors. After acknowledging the fact of these three characters, the authors make response that these inaccurate portrayals can lead to potentially misunderstanding for the public about individuals with mental disabilities in their community, since the movies are main sources for people to …show more content…

She received her Ph.D. from the University of Manitoba in 2011. Zana Lutfiyya is a professor at the University of Manitoba, and she obtained her Ph.D from Syracuse University. Nancy Hansen also works at the University of Manitoba. She is director of the Interdisciplinary Master’s Program in Disability Studies, and she is previous president of the Canadian Disability Studies Association. Being the colleagues at the University of Manitoba, Lutifiyya, Schwartz, and Hansen began a study in 2003, which focuses on how individuals with intellectual disabilities understand, learn and exercise their human rights, and this article is one of their research results. So this article is credible since it is written by three scholars in the field of Disability Studies. Their purpose is to critically examine the stereotypical depictions of characters with intellectual disabilities in Disney films and relate them with disable people in real world. The intended audience is the scholars who study in the same field, the filmmakers who are responsible for the creation of disabled actors, and the viewers of Disney animated films who form prejudicial attitudes due to the misrepresentation of intellectual disabilities portrayed in these movies. The limitation of this article is that the authors focus on characters with mental disabilities, while the character Quasimodo in the

Open Document