Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative methods to resolving legal disputes
Alternative methods to resolving legal disputes
Alternative methods to resolving legal disputes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alternative methods to resolving legal disputes
Arbitration is an alternative that should be considered to resolve disputes between two parties. The arbitrator will weigh the facts and arguments presented from both sides and decide or settle the dispute. What if one side would rather go to court? One may wonder why it matters where claims are heard as long as they are heard somewhere. Why would an employee prefer a court of law to an arbitration proceeding?
Perhaps the most important reason one would seek court is that in arbitration your argument is heard by an arbitrator. You will not have access to a jury of your peers who would possibly be sympathetic to your claim (Nolo, n.d.). Some may feel safer with a group of jurors than with a singular person.
Arbitration can be voluntary
…show more content…
Fleming, & McConnell, C. R, (n.d.). Human Resource Management in Health Care, Principles and Practice
There are many differences between arbitration and mediation. The goal of mediation is dispute resolution without court involvement. It seeks compromise from each side of the dispute and each side feels as if they can claim at least a partial win. Mediation is a voluntary process whereas arbitration can be mandated if arbitration agreements were signed when an employee was hired. Mediation is facilitated by a mediator rather than a judge or arbitrator and may be appointed by a court or privately selected. Settlements reached during mediation are not legally binding without a court order (Leiberman.n.d.).
Arbitration can be binding, meaning that the decision of the arbitrator can’t be challenged and is final. This makes arbitration more like a court proceeding than mediation, although still less formal than a court proceeding. Arbitration usually involves legal counsel and rather than seeking compromise as with mediation, arbitration ends with a prevailing side. Each side presents an argument, may call witnesses, and will present evidence. This does not occur with mediation (Lieberman,
…show more content…
A decision will be made. Mediation provides no such guarantee and settlement may not be reached.
The presentation of reasonable offers is encouraged by parties who do not wish to see the other side's offer chosen. Selecting a more middle ground offer from two reasonable offers is desired.
It is possible and somewhat likely that a pre-arbitration settlement will be reached by the parties once they see the bottom line offer the other side is presenting.
If the arbitrator must make a decision, at least both of the settlement choices were chosen by the parties themselves.
Final-offer arbitration can minimize or eliminate the "chilling effect" which is the practice of disputing parties putting forth less than best offers during negotiations in hopes that the arbitrator will make a decision that will split the differences between the offers.
The beauty of final-offer arbitration is the motivation provided to parties to determine for themselves their last and best offers carefully. The truly last, best offer of the other side can be considered during the grace period to negotiate a settlement between the final two
middle of paper ... ... be the prevailed position under the final offer package. There wont be any permitted compromise by the arbitrator. “Under the package final offer the parties will have an incentive to settle about out of fear that even one issue position perceive to be extreme by the arbitrator will result in rejection of the entire last offer and sudden death.” (Kearney 2009, 278)
Sue contracts with Tom to deliver a quantity of computers to Sue’s Computer Store. They disagree over the amount, the delivery date, the price, and the quality. Sue files a suit against Tom in a state court. Their state requires that their dispute be submitted to mediation or nonbinding arbitration. If the dispute is not resolved, or if either party disagrees with the decision of the mediator or arbitrator, will a court hear the case? Explain. (See Alternative Dispute Resolution.)
Alternative Dispute Resolution or ADR refers to a number of various processes that can be used to resolve legal disputes other than by litigation. Recently, methods of dispute resolution which focus on arbitration, mediation and negotiation as an alternative to adjudication have gained notoriety. This notoriety may have been caused by the public perception that ADR methods are less expensive, more efficient, and more satisfactory than the normal traditional course of litigation. The goals of establishing these processes to resolve disputes as an alternative to more formal legal processes include: 1) to make the regular court system more efficient, less costly and more responsive to the needs of the litigants; 2) to offer alternative methods of dispute resolution in addition to the regular court system; and 3) to provide public education about the available alternatives.
ADR holds an extensive, easily influenced and diverging choice of processes for finding solutions to disputes which are personified by structured negotiation and consensus. It is regarded that arbitration is a familiar ADR technique, however, it is more of an official adjudicative and adversary technique initially a confidential litigation process which has more commonality to litigation than the more original consensual processes which symbolise ADR. As simplified by Angyal (Alternative Dispute Resolution, 1987, p. 11). "The key difference between ADR and those traditional techniques of litigation and arbitration is that ADR techniques are used to produce a resolution to dispute through a negotiated agreement while litigation and arbitration are processes by which a result is imposed on the parties. " We can say that many issues arise with terms.
Anything can happen, even with the most seasoned and professional attorneys such as ours. Yet sometimes going to court will be necessary to fight for the settlement you deserve. You should rely on your attorney as your personal advocate in offering you advice with regard to the choice between settling and going to court. How Long Will it Take to Resolve my Case?
An arbitrator’s function is usually to interpret the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, not to apply his or her standards of what is right in a given situation. The courts have sought to compel labour and management to a peaceful resolution of grievances through arbitration. The Supreme Court has given support to the arbitration process in a series of decisions, and judicial deferral to arbitration has become a basic tenet of national labour policy. Bibliography Byars, L. L. (1997). The.
...on that is final (the parties in conflict don’t reach a decision together like in conciliation).
There are three main ways in which arbitration can come about. Firstly by contract parties signing a contract may include a clause sometimes known as the Scott V Avery clause, which will state that in the event. of the two parties having a dispute they will use an arbitrator to resolve the dispute with the court. Secondly, the two parties may decide to use
In the world of commerce, employment, and other social relations, businesses and individuals strive to choose either arbitration or mediation (conciliation). There are situations when parties submit their cases to arbitration bodies for mediation and, vice versa, when mediators are requested to resolve the dispute through the arbitration award. The arbitration and mediation traditions vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, but their general ideas still remain similar. However, while a mediator in a single process possesses no entitled authority to render an award, an arbitrator is vested with more procedural powers and can execute a mediator’s functions. Furthermore, despite the flexibility of arbitration and mediation procedures, as well
Gies, T. P., & Bagley, A. W. (2013). Mandatory arbitration of employment disputes: What's new and what's next?. Employee Relations Law Journal, 39(3), 22-33.
The options of a negotiated settlement are limited in some cases to set amount of rewards
Mediation is a way to solve a dispute without having to resort to court procedure which sometimes could turned out to be rigid, formal and time consuming especially when it needed a lot of paperwork and the possibility of adjournment which could consume years. Besides that, unlike in court, mediator as a third impartial party did not acted as a judge who decides on the resolution however, the mediator will help the parties to explore the needs and issue which before preventing them from achieving a mutual resolution and settlement. The mediation process gave the authority towards the parties to agree with each other and open up the chance for the parties to meet with a resolution at the end of the mediation session.
Disputants agree to refer to arbitration and agree to be bound by the arbitration decision. The arbitrator reviews the evidence in the case and imposes a decision that is legally binding on the parties. keutgen define arbitration as ‘a form of dispute resolution which is based on a private agreement and which leads to a decision having res judicata effect. Such decision is the result of the activity of one or more individuals whose power to determine the dispute derives from the common will of the parties’.
Living in a fancy new development, Chris is concerned that his new business will prevent him from taking care of his lawn, which has strict requirements under neighborhood rules. Not wanted to upset his neighbors, Chris decides to hire Matt to cut his grass. In a distributive bargaining approach, each negotiator’s objective is in direct conflict with the other. Looking at our situation, each party is concerned about the final price and has a limited number of resources.
Arbitration is a “mechanism for the resolution of disputes which take place usually pursuant to an agreement between two or more parties, under which parties agree to be bound by the decision to be given by the Arbitrator according to law or, if so agreed, other considerations, after a fair hearing such decision being enforceable by law.” Arbitration is, therefore, a process of dispute resolution between the parties through Arbitral Tribunal appointed by the parties to the dispute or by the court at the request of concerned party.