Dbq Border Ruffians

790 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slavery in the southern colony

The Border Ruffians were soldiers that supported keeping slavery and they were from the state of Missouri. Ruffian means a violent person involved in crime. In 1854-1860, they crossed over into the Kansas Territory to rush the acceptance of slavery there before it would become a state. Therefore, the slavery abolitionists from Kansas did not like this push. It caused a mini civil war between Kansas and Missouri. Some people think this may even been the start of the United States Civil War. All of the sources seem to support the assertion that a “civil war has commenced”. In source A, David Atchison, the U.S. Senator for Missouri states, “ Tear down their boasted Free State Hotel til it shall fall to the ground.” The Free State Hotel was important because it was the headquarters of the anti-slavery Abolitionists. Boasted means to brag and to speak with exaggeration and excessive pride, especially about oneself. Tear down mean to pull apart or in pieces by force, especially to leave ragged or irregular edges and to divide or disrupt. This indicates Atchison, the leader of the Border Ruffians, wanted to go to war with the free state. He goes on and on about how to tear apart the possibility …show more content…

Destroy means to put an end to; extinguish introduce to useless fragments, a useless form, or remain his buyer rendering, burning or dissolving; injure beyond repair; demolish; ruined; annihilate. This indicated Sheriff Jones wanted to send his troops in the war since he got a writ to destroy the headquarters that has the offices in the press with cannons. Source B goes far on how it supports the assertion that the Civil War has

Show More
Related

  • What Is The Significance Of The Harpers Ferry Raid

    1027 Words  | 3 Pages

    However, major events along the way led to the Harpers Ferry Raid. For example, with Kansas choosing whether or not to become a free or slave state. That became the biggest event up until John Brown’s Raid. John Brown had always despised slavery, and this enhanced his chance as an organized revolt. The effect of his raid on Harpers Ferry affected what the South thought about abolitionists and the power that they held.

    Read More

  • The Differences Between North And South

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    Additionally, the majority of states had conflicts between slavery in their territory, one of them dealt with missouri. Missouri applied for admission into the Union as a slave state; this became a problem because missouri ruined the balance for free slaves and slave states. The northern states wanted to ban slavery from occurring in missouri because the unbalanced situation it put towards the other states. In response, the southern states declared how congress doesn’t have the power to ban slavery in missouri. However, Henry Clay offers a solution, the missouri compromise of 1820. Missouri admitted as slave state and Maine becomes a free slave state. Slavery is banned in Louisiana creating a 36 30 line in missouri’s southern border; this maintained the balance in the U.S senate.

    Read More

  • According to the Missouri Compromise, Slavery Would be Tolerated Everywhere or No Where

    1550 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was a very successful yet flawed document that stalled the civil war for at least thirty years. The compromise framed the westward expansion of slavery. It set many laws in regards to slavery that would hold the northerners from lashing out at the southerners and sharing the war even earlier. Lastly it separate the economic, political and ethical interests and beliefs of the northern, southern and western regions of the U.S. Although it delayed the Civil war by at least thirty years, it was inevitable. Eventually the issue of slavery would have to be faced head on. Slavery was either going to be tolerated everywhere or no where at all. The North had decided that slavery wouldn't be tolerated and the south seceded from the united states.

    Read More

  • How The Civil War Became A War To Free The Slaves

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    When President Lincoln first called for troops to put down the confederate rebellion, he made no connection between this action and an attempt to end slavery. In fact, he explicitly stated "the utmost care will be observed to avoid any devastation, any destruction of, or interference with, property..." At this point, slavery was not yet integral to the struggle, it was much more important for the Union to air on the side of political prudence and avoid angering loyal boarder states. However, despite this lack of political dialogue, many abolitionists, slaves, and free blacks felt the war to preserve the union could also be a war to end slavery. In the end, they were right, as military need overwhelmed potential political dangers, slaves and the institution of slavery became a central issue in the civil war.

    Read More

  • Essay On Missouri Compromise

    590 Words  | 2 Pages

    The nullification crisis was down right about raising import and export tariffs during the Jackson Administration. This Especially hurts South Carolinians due to them being the common man growing tobacco and other goods. National Debt was basically paid off to borrow more from the tariffs imposed in 1832 by South Carolina and they were very unhappy. South Carolina refused to collect the tariff and begins to arm and build defenses in case the administration was to step in with military force. Eventually Jackson attempts to resolve the problem using two different angles. Legislative sent to elites threatening to forcefully invade South Carolina and to hang Calhoun for wise, Jackson was trying to reduce the tariff by proposing ideas to congress. Another way was Legally, by showing major flaws in South Carolinas arguments against the tariffs. He sent letters to the people of South Carolina saying not to be deceived by names, and that disunion by force is a form of treason are they sure they want to carry that guilt. Other letters were treason. Clay and Calhoun reduced the tariff and force the collection of revenue from the newly modified tariff. South Carolina was pleased and the situation didn’t escalate any further. Although similar issues arise in the

    Read More

  • Redemption for Whom?

    683 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, the Civil War ended in principle and name only with General Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. White Southerners would not accept the freed blacks as equals specifically with full civil and voting rights as granted by the fourteenth and fifteenth amendments (28). Lamar accomplishes his goal of defining the last battle of the Civil War. Southern whites’ use of physical violence, political maneuvering, and public persuasion resulted in Redemption not for freed Blacks, but for the southern whites. A victory so sound that it would sway historical accounts of what Reconstruction was actually about.

    Read More

  • Causes And Consequences Of George Washington's History

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    The nullification crisis was between the federal government and South Carolina. The doctrine of nullification specifies that if any state finds a federal law “unconstitutional,” it can nullify that law within its borders. South Carolina decided to apply that law with the tariffs that were put in place. In response, Jackson ignored that decision as well and sent armed ships to threaten South

    Read More

  • Causes Of Slavery Caused The Civil War

    762 Words  | 2 Pages

    In 1818 the territory of Missouri requested to join the United State as a slave state. This raised the issue if slavery would expand towards this new territory as pro or con as a slave state which threatened the unity of the country. President Jefferson wrote letters to friends, including one to Hugh Nelson in 1820, saying: “The Missouri question is most portentous one which ever threatened our union. In the gloomiest moment of the revolutionary war I had never had any apprehensions equal to what I feel from this” which was sent to. This comment from jefferson showed how jefferson thought towards the conflict and how even the revolutionary war did not compare to the nations unity. The missouri conflict became a major issue many congressman refused the permit of the admission towards missouri as a slave state. The south which supported savery was furious especially to an idea of congressman tallmadge who disliked slavery who proposed missouri be able to enter as a slave ...

    Read More

  • North Vs South Dbq

    887 Words  | 2 Pages

    They had opposite plans for economic growth and their views on slavery and expansion. Those insisting on unity tried to defuse the dispute by offering something to both sides. In an effort to diffuse and balance the power in Congress of the pro-slavery and antislavery factions, two compromises were agreed upon to help resolve this dispute, the first being the Missouri Compromise passed in 1820 was the "fire bell in the night," quoted Jefferson. Earlier in 1819, Missouri territory applied for statehood without barring slavery, additionally, Maine requested to enter the Union as a free state to help keep the "balance". A two-part compromise, the Missouri Compromise, granted both, and passed an amendment that figuratively drew a line across Missouri's southern border. Congress made slavery illegal in all territories purchased in 1803 and lay North this line The coordinates include, below 36'30' will be all slave states and any state above will be a free state. This act aided in temporarily holding the Union together for over thirty years. The Kansas-Nebraska Compromise repealed the Missouri Compromise of dividing pro and anti-slavery by using latitude in 1854. This act granted both states to be a free state and be able to determine for themselves their stand on slavery, also known as popular sovereignty. During the settlement of the Kansas territory, Bleeding Kansas occurred. Political fights over pro and anti slavery and the Free Staters broke out. It's brutality indicates that compromising is not likely and was a precursor for the American Civil

    Read More

  • Mongol DBQ

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    Before the Mongols began to attack Eurasian civilizations in the 1200s, China, Russia, and Persia had developed advanced societies. The Mongols desired power and wealth, and wanted to advance their society. They sometimes attempted to achieve this power and wealth using brutality, but they were not as barbaric as some historians would conclude. There were many positive aspects of their actions. The Mongols were a civilized society because they had an organized military form of warfare, they incorporated early forms of writing, communication, and religious tolerance, and they had key trading partners throughout the region which allowed international trade to safely develop.

    Read More

  • Dbq Missouri Compromise

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    The government set up by Southerners, mostly Missourians, in the Kansas territory wanted to get away with their pro-slavery beliefs by holding fraudulent elections and an illegal government who did not care for the people of Kansas, but for the south’s proslavery beliefs. During that time, the Northerners wanted to protect the rights of the legitimate people of Kansas, which were being shut up by the pro-slavery government. Since our president of the time, was pro-slavery, he rejected any harsh facts about its beloved pro-slavery Kansas government. After a lot of unnecessary blood was shed during the “Bleeding Kansas” period, the free-state advocates, with the effort to work things out between the people of Kansas, were able to find control of the Kansas constitutional convention of 1859, in which the document they drafted barred slavery and fixed the present boundaries of the state. This document was greatly accepted by a vote of the people of Kansas in October, and in December of that same year, a new state government was elected. The people were able to be heard in the choosing of this new government. People’s rights under the government was one of the things that kept our union together. The North wanted just that; a United States of

    Read More

  • Dbq Indian Removal

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    On January 27th, 1825 the U.S Congress had its annual meeting to discuss issues going on in the country and on this day one of those issues was agreeing to set aside territory for Native Americans. This Indian Territory was land that was west of the Mississippi River, but did not include the states Louisiana or Missouri, and the Territory of Arkansas. The land was called Indian Territory because it was set aside by the United States government to move the Native Americans that they relocated from the southern part of the United States in order for white settlers to move into to live on. This territory will eventually be called the state of Oklahoma. By setting aside this land it allowed the United States government to relocate the Native Americans

    Read More

  • Atlanta Reconstruction

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    Having been a gateway to and from southern economics and enterprise before and during the war, Atlanta seemingly sealed its fate by becoming a strategic target for a union offensive. In an effort to cripple the supply line to Confederate forces, General Sherman opted to finish destroying the already war wrenched city. When Union forces finally left Atlanta, it appeared little more then a desolate wasteland. Undoubtedly Sherman had achieved the Unions goal, as well as sending a clear message to the Confederates.

    Read More

  • Impact Of The Civil War On American History

    1141 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Civil War was an important war over the freedom of slaves in the U.S.. The Civil War is well known for being caused by the issue of slavery, but it is really a combination of different events and actions that caused tensions to rise throughout the country. The economic and political issues in the U.S., along with certain actions caused the Civil war, which is one of the United States’s worst wars. All in all, the Civil War was one of the most devastating wars for our country as a whole, and the process of rebuilding would take years and is no easy job.

    Read More

  • The Civil War

    787 Words  | 2 Pages

    The name Civil War is misleading because the war was not a class struggle, but a sectional combat, having its roots in political, economic, social, and psychological elements. It has been characterized, in the words of William H. Seward, as the “irrepressible conflict.” In another judgment the Civil War was viewed as criminally stupid, an unnecessary bloodletting brought on by arrogant extremists and blundering politicians. Both views accept the fact that in 1861 there existed a situation that, rightly or wrongly, had come to be regarded as insoluble by peaceful means.

    Read More

More about Dbq Border Ruffians

Open Document