Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
English Persuasive Writing Techniques
English Persuasive Writing Techniques
Persuasive techniques english writing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The United States is in a tough position as far as politics go, there is a massive hindrance in the form of political parties. For many years now there has been a two party system, this has never been a good idea nor has it really worked. The ideas of the people haven’t been completely represented, there has been issues with getting necessary bills passed, and there is the issue of people not really knowing what a candidate stands for just what the party stands for. All of these issues, need to be changed and the only way to do so is to start and abolish the party system. The two party system has encouraged the idea that voting for anyone who is not ‘blue’ or ‘red’ is a wasted vote. This can be seen in the lack of votes that 3rd party candidates are getting, for example in 2012 between the three third party candidates there was a total of 1,570,767 votes.(IVN) This could be because only a little more than half of the voting age population actually voted. (GMU) Or it could be to the lack of media coverage that they get. Third party candidates, or any candidate for that matter need to get at least 5% of the vote in a general election to get equal ballot access and federal funding like the two big parties. Another reason this idea of a wasted vote comes through is because no one knows what these other parties stand for they just hear what people on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News say about them. For instance the libertarian party has been deemed nothing more than a bunch of pot smoking hippies just because they want to legalize marijuana. The big media outlets don’t look at the party as a whole and find one unpopular opinion they have and bash it into the skulls of their viewers as the truth. In a recent gallup poll it was shown that 60... ... middle of paper ... ...id of the two party system is that the American people would be less likely to vote because there would be a lot more people on the ballot and it wouldn’t be as easy as it is now, where most people just go in and look for the little ‘R’ or the little ‘D’. However as the gallup poll has shown the people seem to want more people on the ballot since they want to see more independents in the running. In closing, Washington had warned the people about the dangers of the political party saying that ‘ It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection.’ Its up to the people of America to realize the problem with two party system, and vote outside of the two major parties.
There has been much speculation whether political parties have become too strong in American politics and if that is a good or bad thing. My belief is that political party power in the United States is just about right where I believe that there are some instances where political parties have been in situations where they have too much power and instances where it is moderate. First off, political parties are crucial to our democratic government because it is composed of a group of people that the constituents elect to represent their issues or achieve a common goal. Being part of a group that shares your common interests or goals is more powerful than tackling an issue by your self. It gives you more voice and power in government. Also, political
system produces conflicts between the Congress and the President and promotes very outdated beliefs that stem from the Constitution. A vast majority of the American population has the stern belief that the Constitution does not need to be changed in any way, shape, or form. This belief, however, is keeping the country from progressing along with other countries around the world. These single parties are holding control of multiple branches of government at once and monopolizing the power during their respective terms. The government “faces an incapacity to govern since each party works as a majority party” and believes there is no reason for innovation (Dulio & Thurber, 2000). The two parties are seemingly always clashing about one thing or the other, making it difficult for things to get accomplished, and proves the thesis correct that the two-party system is ineffective for a growing country.
In discussing the problems surrounding the issue of factionalism in American society, James Madison concluded in Federalist #10, "The inference to which we are brought is that the causes of cannot be removed and that relief is only to be sought in the means of controlling its effects." (Federalist Papers 1999, 75) In many ways, the nature of American politics has revolved around this question since our country's birth. What is the relationship between parties and government? Should the party serve as an intermediary between the populace and government, and how should a government respond to disparate ideas espoused by the factions inherent to a free society. This paper will discuss the political evolution that has revolved around this question, examining different "regimes" and how they attempted to reconcile the relationship between power and the corresponding role of the people. Beginning with the Federalists themselves, we will trace this evolution until we reach the contemporary period, where we find a political climate described as "interest-group liberalism." Eventually this paper will seek to determine which has been the most beneficial, and which is ultimately preferable.
A two-party system is a political system in which only two parties have a realistic opportunity to compete effectively for control. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected officials end up being a member in one of the two major parties. In a two-party system, one of the parties usually holds a majority in the legislature hence, being referred to as the majority party while the other party is the minority party. The United States of America is considered to be a two-party system. A two-party system emerged early in the history of the new Republic. Beginning with the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans in the late 1780s, two major parties have dominated national politics, although which particular two parties has changed with the times and issues. During the nineteenth century, the Democrats and Republicans emerged as the two dominant parties in American politics. As the American party system evolved, many third parties emerged, but few of them remained in existence for very long. Today the Democrats and Republican still remain as the dominant parties. These two parties hav...
middle of paper ... ... d therefore the smaller parties can be considered to have very little effect on the overall political situation. In conclusion, the UK can still best be described as a two party system, provided two considerations are taken into account. The first is that Conservative dominance victories between 1979-97 was not a suggestion of party dominance and that eventually, the swing of the political pendulum will be even for both sides. This can perhaps be seen today with Labour's two landslide victories in 1997 and 2001.
Our political system is our backbone, so we need to buckle down and start working together, learning from our past mistakes. In his article, “Elston He on Abolishing Political Parties” Elston He gives his opinion about political parties, “Political parties were created to express common views, to propose a common platform, and to unify members of American political society so that action could be taken. Today, however, political parties are simply used as perfunctory labels and to categorize people as “this or that”. This is a good statement to show just how divided America has become. We as a country should abolish all political parties and run as a whole instead of separately as enemies because, together we are stronger then we are apart, government formation should be built upon honesty and integrity not lies, and political parties will only lead to disaster.
Due to the fact that the two current parties already hold either a left-centrist or right-centrist political platform, a third party would need to adopt a moderate standing. A moderate third party would also be idyllic because since the 2008 presidential election, more voters are becoming independent rather than identifying as either Democrat or Republicans (Chart on A530). A third political party’s platform would have moderate views on “hot button” issues. Moreover, if a third party was another choice in a presidential race, moderate voters, who would feel unrepresented by the two opposing parties, would want to vote since the more relevant party would have a better chance of winning a presidential seat and represent m...
The biggest problem in America today is that the party line has been drawn over our lives, drawn down the center of the nation, drawn through our homes and families. Rather than Republicans and Democrats agreeing on a vision of America but disagreeing on the means to achieve it, the two parties point their fingers, call their opponents names, and declare the other side unpatriotic. The Republicans are running on a platform of “the Democrats will destroy America”, while the Democrats do practically nothing at all, proud to not be Republicans. And we, the people, call them leaders. We, the people, elected them. We, the people, make their jobs easy because we, the people whom they have sworn to serve, don’t question them.
There have been many different political parties come and go in American history and there will likely be more in the future. As long as people continue to have
One reason why the US have two major political parties, is because the US have separation of our legislative and executive branches. The United States is not a democracy, its a republic. In most democracies of the world the legislator elects a prime minister who is the defacto executive of the country. (http://www.thesoapboxers.com/why-does-the-united-states-have-a-two-party-system/) Political Parties are a group of persons who seek to control government through the winning of elections and the holding of public office. (http://www.sparknotes.com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/political-parties/section1.rhtml) In my opinion, reason we only have two major political parties could be because they are the general idea of how our
Political parties provide the public and the nation with leadership that is critical in conflict resolution processes in many areas of the government. In this paper, the party system of the American government has been discussed from history to the present, bringing out the dominant parties in the country. With the major parties controlling the majority share of the government, the American political system is robust and comprehensive as well. In fact, this is what has contributed to making America one of the most developed democracies in the world. Essentially, social groups also work together with political parties to promote the interests of the public and enhance development in a country.
America has been content with using their effective system despite the recurring debate of the two party systems that arises around every major political election. The Democrats has been associated with the working class population, whereas the Republican has been know to represent the interest of the upper class and the higher ten percent wealthy population. These two parties were able to dominate the needs of the population by assessing the needs and finding ways to gain support where they lack. With it being two major parties one of their main goals is two gain the support from people that support third party voters by taking on those third party policies, by doing this they are able to gain support from them in the final elections since their party are not in favor in
As stated earlier, both parties shift over time. This means for the parties to get re-elected they have to pick up on different combinations of current issues, thus follow public opinion. Since the two-party system follows the majority in public opinion, the multi party system inevitably sometimes leads to the minority rule over the majority. Even parties with extremely radical views have a chance to be elected to power. This could result in chaotic and disastrous changes. The approach of a two-party system doesn’t allow this possibility to happen, it moderates political ideologies and protects the “majority from the
Reference.com tells us that advantages to a two party system include ease of voting. With only two parties, often the ideals of the candidate follow with that of the party in which they are running. It simplifies things for us to only consider the major issues and not having to sort through the millions of pieces of legislation proposed. Isn’t that what we’ve elected these individuals for? To be the voice of ourselves in the government? These two opposing sides allow for differential voter approaches to their personal beliefs. Voters have a clear-cut, concise
In this day and age we are seeing what George Washington for told as the “the baneful effects of the spirit of party”3. These parties are tearing our nation apart, and it is being torn more now than it ever has