Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elizabethan crime and punishment in the 1500's
Elizabethan crime and punishment in the 1500's
Elizabethan crime and punishment in the 1500's
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elizabethan crime and punishment in the 1500's
Crime and Punishment in the Elizabethan Era
In February, 1587, Queen Elizabeth had ordered her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scotts, to her execution to eliminate all possibilities of any threats to her throne. This event would reflect the relentless violence and unforgiving punishments of the judicial system in Elizabethan Era. Criminals during Queen Elizabeth’s reign in England, known as the Elizabethan Era, were subject to harsh, violent punishments for their crimes. England was separated into two social classes, which were the nobility, and the commoners. Within each class, the punishments were defined by the class and type of crime that had been committed. Under the Tudor rule, the punishments dating back to the middle ages were revived. Such gruesome punishments were carried out to strike fear into the hearts of the English citizens and lower crime rate. There were a wide range of crimes that a person could be prosecuted for, and even included the act of witchcraft and alchemy. Of course, today the American court system would find prosecutions of witchcraft and alchemy ridiculous. However, in the Elizabethan Era, people accused of even the most petty of crimes would be immediately placed in prison to await their sentences, often resulting in death. Public executions were a common practice, and were often a form of entertainment for a crowd of spectators. Often considered as the “Golden Age” in English history, England’s court systems became an essential part of society because cruel punishments were severe enough to strike fear into English citizens as well as demonstrating the influence and power of Queen Elizabeth’s rule.
The court system was used by Queen Elizabeth to display her power. There were three
categories in th...
... middle of paper ...
...no commitment toward England's laws.
Works Cited
Alchin, Linda. elizabethan-era.org.uk.N.p.. Web. 28 Mar 2014..
"Court Life ." . N.p.. Web. 26 March 2014 . .
"Crime and Punishment in Elizabethan England." . N.p.. Web. 26 March 2014 . .
"Life in Elizabethan Courts." . N.p.. Web. 26 March 2014 . .
Taylor, Christopher. "Elizabethan Government." . N.p.. Web. 26 March 2014 . .
"The Elizabethan Court ." . Royal Museums Greenwich. Web. 26 March 2014 . .
A common theme among all of the styles of punishment during the Elizabethan era is presenting the prisoners with the most gruesome punishments
Today some people can get away with just about any small crime with no punishments, but in the Elizabethan era you'd think twice before committing a crime. For stealing fruit in the Elizabethan era you can lose your hand. Today you would get community service or some other small punishment. The punishment you were given had to do with the crime, your wealth, and who you were connected to.
The lesson is situated in the fourth week, and is the eleventh and second last lesson in the unit outline.
According to Jones, modern estimates suggest perhaps 100,000 trials took place between 1450 and 1750, with an estimated execution total ranging between 40,000 and 50,000. This death toll was so great because capital punishment was the most popular and harshest punishment for being accused of witchcraft. Fear of the unknown was used to justify the Puritans contradictive actions of execution. Witch trials were popular in this time period because of religious influences, manipulation through fear, and the frightening aspects of witchcraft.
There were 20 people executed in 2016 (“Executions By Year”). At first glance, this may seem like a fairly normal number that is close to the previous few years. However, when comparing this to the amount of people executed during the Elizabethan Era, it is a miniscule number. The exact number is unknown, but Queen Elizabeth I was said to have executed hundreds, or even thousands of people, just on her own. Just from these numbers alone, it is easy to tell that crimes committed and punishments received were extremely brutal compared to what we have today, and have impacted the way we deal with things.
The Tudor era, from 1485-1603, still had excruciating punishments towards criminals. They were intended to prevent others from committing the crimes. Public executions were very common during the Tudor era, and extremely popular. Beheading was a common for those who committed treason, and even for not complying with the correct religion. They were usually publically displayed, and attracted many crowds who had no entertainment, despite the true purpose of public executions. This expresses not only the views of physical pain and death to deter people, but also the entertainment that people had for seeing the death of people.
Crime and Punishment and Notes from the Underground Fyodor Dostoyevsky's stories are stories of a sort of rebirth. He weaves a tale of severe human suffering and how each character attempts to escape from this misery. In the novel Crime and Punishment, he tells the story of Raskolnikov, a former student who murders an old pawnbroker as an attempt to prove a theory. In Notes from the Underground, we are given a chance to explore Dostoyevsky's opinion of human beings.
"Today's system, where imprisonment is a common penalty for most crimes, is a historical newcomer." Many crimes during 1718 and 1776 were punishable by death. This was usually done by hanging, sometimes by stoning, breaking on the rack and burning at the stake. Towards the end of the 1700's people realized that cruel punishment did little to reduce crime and their society was changing the population grew and people started to move around more frequently. There had to be a search for new punishments. "New punishments were to rely heavily on new ideas imported from Europe in the writing of such social thinkers of the Enlightenment as the baron de Montesquieu, Voltaire, Thomas Pain and Cesare Beccaria". These thinkers came to believe that criminals could be rehabilitated."
Punishments in colonial days were a lot harsher than they are today. There were extreme punishments for minor things like lying, name calling, or rude comments. In colonial times there ideas of punishments were different than ours. They didn't use a jail very often, but instead punished them publicly to shame them. Some of their not so pleasant punishments were to whip you, put you in the stock, which meant that people could throw things at you all day long, or burn your crime onto your hand. If the criminal stole the formidable punishments could become as extreme as a hanging, for things as small as taking a silly silver spoon!. Although punishments for woman and children
Several interesting facts stood out to me about the Elizabethan era. One of which had to do with how alcohol in the form of wine and beer was consumed. It was quite bizarre to learn that wine and even beer were combined with spices and herbs. Beer was flavoured with just about anything, including cinnamon, ginger, nutmeg, pepper, and rosemary. It probably wouldn’t be ideal to try these recipes, though.
I have also learnt that punishing someone in the Middle Ages was rather like making a horror movie or becoming a torturer with punishments often being aimed at extreme pain, terrible mutilation and humiliation even after a painful death. I have also learnt of many devices such as the gibbet, or the rack, and the common practice of displaying impaled heads on battlements as a terror tactic. All in all I have learnt that judgment in the Middle Ages was illogical and unreasonable, and punishment simply torturous and
Justice is done in very different ways from country to country or from era to era. The Elizabethan era had a particular way of doing justice and advising their Queen. From 1558 to 1603, the inner circle also known as the Privy Council helped and advised the queen. The court members were handpicked by Elizabeth which naturally led to favorites among them. Other than justice, the culture was very different. More specifically, the etiquette in my lady’s chamber - practiced by Queen Elizabeth I - portraits a very different image from an ordinary bedroom in the 21st century.
The crimes of the Elizabethan Age can range from minor and sometimes pointless to major crimes with evil punishments. Some of the crimes the commoners and the nobility committed were rebellion, witchcraft, poaching, and fraud. The person that enforced the law during the Elizabethan Age was the queen, Queen Elizabeth the first. She formed the laws known as the Sumptuary Laws that people of the Elizabethan Age followed.
In every society and community, everyone had a role to play which made their life work and made the economy go around. Although these roles were not pre-set, a person’s life can influence where in the community they fit. This is also true from criminals. Criminals weren’t just born to break the law, no one would chose to lead a life of a criminal, but instead, most were pushed to a certain point to take steps against the law. A life as a criminal was tough and hard, although their ethics were off and moral were low, most were just trying to survive. These certain things are true today, crime is still committed out of necessity. This can be caused because of poverty, when a person is too poor to provide themselves with the basic necessities of life they might turn to crime in order to get these certain things, such as food. This was especially true during the Victorian Era. One of the main differences though is the punishment
In the early modern era in Europe, public executions were the primary punishment given to members of society who were involved in criminal behavior. This form of punishment served to showcase the absolute power of the state, King and church to take away the life of any citizen who disrupts peace. It was a way to make the criminal justice system visible and effective in an era when the criminal justice system was in its beginning stages of demonstrating orderliness (Spierenburg). More specifically, it was a relatively straightforward and psychological way to evoke deterrence. The potential of gruesome violence, public persecution and religious betrayal were tools thought to be strong enough to make public executions a successful form of deterrence because within the community, social bonds and religion were the foundation of everyday life.... ...