Comparing Physical to Financial Capital Maintenance

877 Words2 Pages

When compared to the physical capital maintenance concept, the financial capital maintenance concept is the better choice for standard setting when distinguishing between a return of capital and a return on capital. The main argument in favor of physical capital maintenance is that it provides information that has better predictive value, confirmatory value, and is more complete. However, due to agency theory, prospect theory, and positive accounting theory, neutrality and completeness under physical capital maintenance would be impaired so gravely that predictive value and confirmatory value become inefficacious. As a result, financial capital maintenance, with its use of historical cost, is able to provide information to decision makers with stronger confirmatory value and predictive value.
The capital maintenance concept used results in differences between the relevance and faithful representation of the data that appears in the balance sheet and income statement. The difference between financial capital maintenance and physical is the treatment of unrealized holding gains and losses. Financial capital maintenance does not allow for unrealized holding gains and losses. Only realized gains and losses are included in income because they “are considered a return on capital” (Schroeder et al., 2013). This means, “income is measured only after the investment is recovered” (Gamble, 1981). Physical capital maintenance “consider[s unrealized holding gains and losses] as returns of capital and do[es] not include them income.” (Schroeder et al., 2013). Instead, they are treated as adjustments to equity and included in other comprehensive income. Therefore, with physical capital maintenance “an increase in an entity’s wealth as...

... middle of paper ...

...nants and performance bonuses. Under positive accounting theory, when a company is in danger of violating a debt covenant, management is more likely to use accounting policies that shift reported earnings to the current period. This can lead to further manipulation of financial information through earnings management, and fair value provides an easy manner in which to do so.
Initially, it appears that physical capital maintenance provides information that is more complete with better predictive and confirmatory value by its use of fair value. In actuality, it provides management with a greater ability to manipulate financial information and the wherewithal to do so resulting in decreased decision usefulness, as described by SFAC No. 8, compared to financial capital maintenance. Therefore, financial capital maintenance is the better choice for standards setters.

Open Document