Carral's Argument Analysis

738 Words2 Pages

Héctor L Carral, a multimedia engineer wrote an article titled Stop Saying Technology is causing Social Isolation for The Huffington Post. The author of the article has a biased option, therefore does not include any research that would refute his argument. Carral states “it’s only obvious to blame them [technology] for some of society’s problems. Carral also states I believe that accusing technology (and, again, especially smartphones) of ruining social interaction and even all kinds of experiences is, to say the least, quite wrong and misguided. There was an obvious division between the commenters who agree with Carral and those who disagree with his argument. The demographics of commentators. From observing the occupations that the commenters listed, it was apparent the people who were against Hector Carral’s article were parents and educators while the people who agreed with his …show more content…

It is noticeable that many of the comments are being ignited by personal experiences rather than looking at the argument globally. One commenter by the name of Ed Vandyke (comment posted on11/06/2015) said “Technology is isolating to those who haven’t integrated into a technological society “Another commenter by the name of Jiban Ligar argued that “real life interaction creates empathy; tech doesn’t support real life experiences.” An immense amount of comments was similar in light of the fact. They all utilized watch other’s comments to make their argument stronger. Richard Hazel, a New York State Licensed Acupuncturist at Range of Motion Acupuncture said “Can your social media interactions cause a release of oxytocin (the bonding hormone)? I don't think so. If it can't create the emotional bonds that humans need to feel connected, then they are distractions and only imitate true human connection.” Jen Nielson replied to his comment asking “Do you realize a true statement can lead to a false one?” (Masked-man

Open Document