Argument Analysis: Coatesville By John Jay Chapman

1988 Words4 Pages

My English 1310 course was taught by Professor Daniel Stuart. He taught us the concept of academic writing and why it is important. Academic writing is the process of down ideas, using a formal tone, deductive reasoning and third person. Writing done to carry out the requirements of a college or university on a research based level. It requires a starting point or introduction, followed by a thesis on the preferred topic, then comes proving and disproving of the evidence based arguments. Learning academic writing is important because it is a way to communicate our thoughts clearly and originality. It helps us think and see what evidence we can come up to contribute to that thinking. This course approached this idea of academic writing by …show more content…

The difference between the “Argument Description” and the “Argument Analysis” is that in this particular essay, we are now required to find the implications of the writer’s claim and then form our own argument. I wrote my argument analysis over an essay called “Coatesville” by John Jay Chapman. Once again, I had to identify the primary and secondary argument for the essay. The primary and secondary claims for this paper are that we are all guilty and that we need to have a mass revival. I had to provide some evidence from the text to support the claims as well. With this essay instead of stating the justifications like in the argument description, we were asked to find the implications of this essay. Some implications in this essay were the created skepticism and the unnecessary amount of pathos. When I submitted my work and received my feedback, I could see that my some of my writing skills were improving. After taking my feedback from my last essay and trying to incorporate his corrections into my next essay, I could see that my grade had slightly improved. Although when I received my feedback for this essay, I noticed that I still had a problem with fragmented sentences and that this essay was undeveloped. When I created my revision memo, I attempted to work on my fragmented sentences and tried to …show more content…

In this essay, we were to evaluate the ideas proposed by the author. Isolating and analyzing the key claims within the text. This essay required us to provide justifications used by the author to support those claims and provide an analysis of the ideas. I chose a fictional text for this prompt called “The Things They Carried” by Tim O’Brien. The argument from this particular story is that everyone carries a burden. The justifications that I came up with to support this claim was Lt. Jimmy Cross’ strong infatuation with a girl named Martha and how all the soldiers carried some kind of burden, either physical or emotional. I needed to provide evidence to support these justifications. Some evidence I provided to back up the justification was how a soldier named Ted Lavender died on duty and how Lt. Cross blames himself for Ted’s death because he was concentrating more on Martha than his own crew. My feedback for this assignment wasn’t that good. I didn’t fully understand the prompt and that caused me to get a bad grade on the essay. The professor said my quotes were awkwardly used in this assignment and that I needed more cohesion between my thesis and the surrounding sentences. I noticed that I still need to work on my grammar techniques. One thing I did realize about my feedback was that I had less sentence fragments, so I count that as an improvement. It wasn’t required to make a revision memo

More about Argument Analysis: Coatesville By John Jay Chapman

Open Document