Aquinas Nature Of Evil

467 Words1 Page

In question 78 by Aquinas explains how evil is not intended for its own sake, but for the sake of avoiding another evil or obtaining a good. He further goes on to say that someone would choose the good for its own sake, without suffering the loss of another good and then uses an example of a lustful man: “anyone would choose to obtain a good intended for its own sake, without suffering loss of the other good; even as a lustful man would wish to enjoy a pleasure without offending God” (Q. 78, Reply to Objection 2). This point about the lustful man wanting to enjoy the pleasure, without offending God, really connected to Dante because it seems that people, for the most part, did not commit sins with the intent of offending God and making Him …show more content…

On the other hand, there are sinners who have sinned through malice or on purpose, which can be said for those who committed simony. These individuals chose to use their power in the church for their own selfish gains, which they knew was wrong and against God’s will. In this way those who committed the sin of simony did commit sins of malice. Another point that Aquinas made that was very interesting was about how sins that are committed through habit are sins of malice. When a person commits a sin the first time it is not necessarily through habit, but overtime can become habit. The first time the sin is committed the person may not know that it is evil, but overtime if the person chooses to keep committing that sin, it becomes a habit and therefore the person does it on purpose. Once a habit is formed, it becomes natural to keep doing what the habit is, which is why it is important to choose to live virtuously instead of viciously because both lifestyles can become habits. If one does not choose to break a bad habit, that person can become responsible for it, which can be seen in the

Open Document