Analysis Of Dan Pallotta's TED Talk

816 Words2 Pages

Throughout Dan Pallotta’s TED Talk he argues that the discrimination against nonprofits is limiting their ability to change the world. He believes that nonprofits operate under one rule book, while for-profits operate under another. And the book for-profits are encouraged to operate under, allows them to attract the best talent, spend money to make money, take risks, pay dividends, and take their time returning profits to investors.
Of course, Pallotta can’t just state this without having some sort of evidence to back up his claims. To provide evidence that nonprofits are discouraged from incentivizing people to produce more, he provides an example of how if someone wants to make $50 million dollars selling violent video games, they will put …show more content…

When I watched the video the first time, I completely agreed with him, but as I analyzed his argument further, I am not so sure. A lot of the things he was saying makes sense, however, it is the lack of evidence that he provides that worries me. Only a few times, did Pallotta give actual data to back up his argument. Pallotta relied on storytelling and non-real-life examples that he constructed solely for the talk. Overall, I think that not providing quantifiable data to back up his claims leaves the potential that he came up with this idea that nonprofits are discriminated, and then made his “stories” fit his claim. In addition, I think that one potential problem is that his charity went out of business, so he may just believe that he was discriminated, when in actuality, he may not have been. Pallotta very well could be right, but I think that in order for people to believe him, he needs to be specific in his claims. He also needs to provide statistics, data, and multiple examples of real-life examples for each, rather than just one for each claim. Overall, I suggest that Pallotta gather real data about why nonprofits have struggled to grow, and then come up with an argument. I think that this approach will allow for a much more accurate and credible claim as to why nonprofits are failing to really grow and therefore, change the

Open Document