An Analysis Of Roger Rosenblatt's The Man In The Water

502 Words2 Pages

Humans believe that they are the dominant race. Yes, there are many humans on earth, but that doesn’t mean we are largest race on the planet. Yes, humans are quite intelligent, but there are animals that prove that they can outwit humans. Yes, humans are high up on the food chain, but we aren’t the top. If anything, humans shouldn’t be considered the dominant race. There are many animal races that prove to be more dominant than humans. Not only are these races larger, higher (on the food chain), and smarter, but those species are indefinitely stronger. A person breaks an arm, cries instantly. An animal breaks a leg, it keeps walking until death. The very point that Roger Rosenblatt is trying to make in his piece The Man in the Water, that humans …show more content…

Arrogant people believe that they are better than one another. Modest people will never say that they are better than others. Arrogant and modest are two opposite ends of the spectrem, correct? There is one thing in common between them and that is that almost everybody believes themselves better than nature. If only people would realize that nature is the cause of almost all deaths. The deaths that are not caused by nature is human error. Nature is the cause of cancer, of the plague, natural disasters, and so much more. Nature is the most common death. Humans, in accordance to Rosenblatt’s The Man in the Water, are blind to each other up until times of need. Nobody would have noticed a “Balding, probably in his 50s, an extravagant mustache” (The Man in the Water; Roger Rosenblatt; paragraph 4; sentence 2) old man until he starts saving people after a plane crash. A person could walk around school wearing a hoodie, baggy jeans, and a backpack and nobody would notice. Then, when the school is attacked, that person is the one who takes the attacker down. Ordinary people that nobody would have never noticed, are the most likely to be the hero. Anybody can be

Open Document