American Reform Summary

1426 Words3 Pages

Johnson states that in the early 19th century, the United States of America was developing as both a liberal democratic society, with an ethos of individualism, and as a capitalist economy, with influential middle and business classes. In the early decades of the 19th Century, Rochester was a rapidly growing and economically developing community. Its position on the early canal system helped make it a center for regional trade and early manufacturing. The manufacturing and sale of products came to be increasingly based in specialized buildings, which utilized management and wage laborers. A growing middle class and business owning class arose in the city, whose conditions included a relatively increased standard of living, and higher levels …show more content…

He contends that the middle and business classes of Rochester were the largest and earliest embracers of religious revivalism. Evangelical religious conversion provided the middle class and business owners with ethical codes to de jure guide their behavior and put forward a public image of virtue. The tendencies of these religious revivalist groups to emphasize individual effort in spiritual fulfillment, self-control, and the virtue of acting to improve conditions in the world, could be interpreted to compliment their place within a democratic capitalist …show more content…

Walters describes the focus of his book as seeking an understanding of reform movements in terms of how the messages and efforts of these movements resonated with the social and cultural factors of American society. Walters defines reform movements as arising from people declaring something to be problem, envisioning a goal for remedying it, and establishing an organized effort to achieve their intended change. He describes reform activity as one of multiple choices for people in the 19th century to react to the conditions and changes within American society, which part of the population embraced, due to the appeal of the ideas to them and social conditions enabling them to afford to follow through on the matter. Walters approaches Antebellum reform by covering the United States of America overall. He also claims that the reformism of the Antebellum period was distinct and had little connection with the reform movements of the Progressive era, and that periods of war segmented periods of reform in the United States. Thus, he treats the reform movements of 1815-1860, as an interconnected element within the systems of

Open Document