Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
chomsky and language development
the faculty of language noam chomsky
on the nature, use, and acquisition of language noam chomsky summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: chomsky and language development
Language; we use it everyday. From describing portraits to our family and friends, or calling out plays during a football game with our classmates, people utilize language every moment. But how did this “language” evolve? Daniel Dor, an Israeli linguist, created a theory of Language as a Communication Technology, which is “a new general framework for the description, analysis and explanation of language as a socially-constructed communication technology, designed by cultural evolution to allow for communication across the experiential gaps between its users.” Dor argues that language is related to it's function of communicating to others rather than being and “organ” as seen in Chomsky's argument. Dor's view also differs from the Functionalist viewpoint, though ever-so slightly; functionalists argue that language developed due to morphological changes such as larger brain size. Dor argues that language developed though cultural evolution, being learned and improved on by every generation. Utilizing Dor's language theory, Eva Jabonka and Marion J. Lamb argue that the “evolution of language [is] the outcome of continuous interactions between the cultural and genetic inheritance system, with both niche construction and genetic assimilation being important.” (pg 307) Although this argument is presented strongly by Jablonka and Lamb, it needs to be tested for validity. This argument will only be valid “... if and only if it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false.”
The first premise is that a language culturally develops from incoherent babble to a sophisticated linguistic system. Jablonka and Lamb show this idea in the introduction of their thought experiment. In this experiment, there are a group of early...
... middle of paper ...
...language to evolve, causing the conclusion to be true as well. Therefore, based on the definition of validity, this argument is valid.
Although the conclusion is inductively proven to be valid, that does not mean that the conclusion is sound. This idea of genetic and cultural systems is still relatively new, and it needs more evidence in order to become a sound conclusion. In addition to the evidence, there are other ideas that still seem relevant to the development of language. The Chomsky and functionalist views are still being debated over, so this interaction idea is not solidified as the “end-all” of how language developed. As stated before, the conclusion is valid, based upon the inductive reasoning presented by the thought experiment. However, the soundness of the conclusion cannot be proven due to the highly debatable ideas presented by thought experiment.
The article The Strange Persistence of First Languages by Julie Sedivy was an intriguing and eye-opening piece of writing to read. The concepts she brought to life through her explicit writing revealed many things I had never heard of before. The further I read, the more I wanted to know and the deeper my interest became. As a monolingual, this article was insightful, captivating and ultimately provided me with a new perspective on language.
How can it be that something so uniquely human and commonplace in our everyday existence as language, could transcend the limits of our immediate understanding? We all know how to speak and comprehend at least one language, but defining what we actually know about that language an infinitely more demanding process. How can a child without previous knowledge of the construction and concepts of language be born into the world with an innate ability to apprehend any dialect? Mark Baker, in his book The Atoms of Language, seeks to address these unsettling questions, proposing as a solution, a set of underlying linguistic ingredients, which interact to generate the wide variety of languages we see today.
The prehistoric times stand evidence to the power of language as a tool for communication and growth. Language has proven to be an effective medium and factor surrounding the evolution of man. Language has played a big role in the development of individuals and societies. What is spoken and/or written, help in the initiation of imagination, expression of feelings, and conveyance of thoughts and ideas.
Hill, Jane H., P. J. Mistry, and Lyle Campbell. The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright. Berlin [etc.: Mouton De Gruyter, 1998. Print.
My younger brother used to ask questions all the time about how certain words were invented. “Who came up with the word sky? Why did they call it that?” were some of many questions I was asked when we were growing up. I always had to tell him that I had no idea or that it just happened. What Jonathan was questioning is a concept that linguists and anthropologists are still trying to answer today. The evolution of language is an incredibly difficult process to determine. Robbins Burling has written an entire book about, The Talking Ape, and still cannot definitively prove that the theories he presents are the exact way that language developed. However, Burling points out a plethora of evidence that points in such a direction. One piece of
Another difficulty cultures deal with is language and the way people speak. In some cases, people struggle to belong by making changes in the way they speak the English language just to be assimilated. They attempt to use words and letters, as well as body language that fit in the norm; all in an attempt to denounce their original intonation and style of pronunciation. One ...
Language is an important part to culture, it allows people to communicate with one another, while learning and sharing information as well. The importance and extent of which language can influence a particular culture was studied and made well known by the scientists, Benjamin Lee Whorf and Edward Sapir. According to the article, How Language Shapes Thoughts, the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is based on the idea of language being able to shape the way that individuals think. Although this theory was once hard to believe, there is now evidence that shows that language does in fact influence the way an individual thinks. Language can shape the way people perceive time, space, how things are remembered, and also influences the learning process. Some
Chomsky and Skinner and Theories Of Language Development Many psychologists have studied and researched into how we acquire language. Some have concluded that the ability to learn language is a genetically inherited skill. Others believe that language is learned following birth and is due to environmental factors. This is part of the nature vs. nurture debate.
There are three main theories of child language acquisition; Cognitive Theory, Imitation and Positive Reinforcement, and Innateness of Certain Linguistic Features (Linguistics 201). All three theories offer a substantial amount of proof and experiments, but none of them have been proven entirely correct. The search for how children acquire their native language in such a short period of time has been studied for many centuries. In a changing world, it is difficult to pinpoint any definite specifics of language because of the diversity and modification throughout thousands of millions of years.
... middle of paper ... ... Language development also is influenced by environmental experiences, including culture” (p. 116).
The study of language development, one of the most fascinating human achievements, has a long and rich history, extending over thousands of years (Chomsky, 2000). As the nature-versus-nurture argument is inevitable to arise whenever human behaviors are discussed, it is not surprising that language experts have debated the relative influences of genetics and the environment on language development (Hulit & Howard, 2002). Among the various proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in acquiring a language, two opposing theoretical positions, the behaviorist and the nativist, are the most prominent and influential ones (Ayoun, 2003; Garton & Pratt, 1998; Owens, 2001). Due to the indefinite explanation of the exact process, the continuous interest of the inquiring people, and the sheer significance of the precise result, the controversy remains ongoing and popular. In view of the more obvious limitations of the behaviorist interpretation and the prevailing contributions of the nativist interpretation, the latter one is more rational to accept.
Language development is a complex topic which has been largely debated about amongst linguists over a long period of time. Some believe that language is acquired through experience and communication with those in their environment (nurture). Studies have indicated that there is a correlation between environmental factors (such as the way we speak to infants and socio economic status) and language acquisition. Conversely, others claim that language development is natural and innate (nature). Research shows how language is inherent regardless of what the language is. Additionally theorists such as Noam Chomsky believe that we are born with an intrinsic mechanism/device for acquiring language (Bee & Boyd, 2010). Either way, it seems that both nurture and nature play vital roles in a child’s language development.
Still today, it is the commonly held belief that children acquire their mother tongue through imitation of the parents, caregivers or the people in their environment. Linguists too had the same conviction until 1957, when a then relatively unknown man, A. Noam Chomsky, propounded his theory that the capacity to acquire language is in fact innate. This revolutionized the study of language acquisition, and after a brief period of controversy upon the publication of his book, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, in 1964, his theories are now generally accepted as largely true. As a consequence, he was responsible for the emergence of a new field during the 1960s, Developmental Psycholinguistics, which deals with children’s first language acquisition. He was not the first to question our hitherto mute acceptance of a debatable concept – long before, Plato wondered how children could possibly acquire so complex a skill as language with so little experience of life. Experiments have clearly identified an ability to discern syntactical nuances in very young infants, although they are still at the pre-linguistic stage. Children of three, however, are able to manipulate very complicated syntactical sentences, although they are unable to tie their own shoelaces, for example. Indeed, language is not a skill such as many others, like learning to drive or perform mathematical operations – it cannot be taught as such in these early stages. Rather, it is the acquisition of language which fascinates linguists today, and how it is possible. Noam Chomsky turned the world’s eyes to this enigmatic question at a time when it was assumed to have a deceptively simple explanation.
“Language forces us to perceive the world as man presents it to us.” (Julia Penelope). Language is a mold Many will say that no matter what language one speaks everyone has the same brain anatomy thus language does not shape the way that we think and they way we perceive the world. While others believe there is no correlation with language and how it shapes human thoughts, there is evidence that proves otherwise; language does shape the way that we think. It is odd to think that no matter the language one speaks that everyone’s way of thinking is all identical. Lera Boroditsky article, “Lost in Translation” goes over her theory about language and how it shapes the way that we think. She shuts down a lot of critics who do not agree with her
To understand how children, develop language we must consider a controversial topic - nature versus nature. (Watchel, 2016) Nativist believe children develop language due to nature. Linguist Noam Chomsky proposed the theory of Universal Grammar. Universal Grammar states that humans are born with an innate language faculty, or capacity to acquire language – which is also sometimes referred to as the Language Acquisition Device (LAD). Behaviorist believe children develop language due to nurture. B.F. Skinner (Operant Conditioning Theory) believes language is acquired through modeling and reinforcemen...