Patriarchism In The Yellow Wallpaper

1831 Words4 Pages

Throughout time and literature, the male supremacy and oppression of women have been the topic of many literary debates and creative writings. Feminist theorists are and have always been on a perpetual literary high; women writers such as Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar in 1979 and Charlotte Perkins Gilman in 1892 wrote about the oppression of women and the liberation that they were adamant about receiving. This spark for freedom in a patriarchal society drove Charlotte Perkins Gilman to write her infamous short story “The Yellow Wall-Paper.” In writing this story, Gilman depicts an oppressed woman taken from society and condemned to an oppressive treatment that paralyses her as a human; the distributer of this treatment is the capitalist patriarchy. …show more content…

Thus, women are applicable to being machines as they are this artificial construction of man. Understanding women as being machines affirms the idea of the cyborg in “The Yellow Wall-Paper.” Haraway also says, “machines were not self-moving, self-designing, autonomous. They could not achieve man’s dream, only mock it. They were not man, an author to himself, but only a caricature of that masculinist reproductive dream” (Haraway 11). Applying this facet to the woman in “The Yellow Wall-Paper” reveals her under a new light. The narrator is an interpretation of the classic oppressed female who is silenced by the dominant, capitalist male and, therefore, lacks an identity as a human. Haraway states that this lack of self is what contributes to her definition of the cyborg; the narrator is part machine because she has no sense of self apart from …show more content…

Gilman introduces this capitalist man who suppresses the narrator in “The Yellow Wall-Paper.” John, the alleged husband of the main character is a physician; of course he is. John exhibits this capitalist, male supremacy throughout the entire short story: “John is practical in the extreme. He has no patience with faith, an intense horror of superstition, and he scoffs openly at any talk of things not to be felt and seen and put down in figures” (Gilman 792). He is this hyper-masculine, domineering man who also happens to be a physician. It’s not by chance that he renders a desire for monetary figures, as do many capitalists. Mary Mahowald’s study on Marxism aids in identifying John as a capitalist, patriarchal figure: “The bourgeoisie are the "Johns" who pay workers fixed wages while setting no limits to the capital they themselves acquire. The captains of industry thus expand their own options by constraining those of the people who do the work on which their profits depend (44). The capitalist male is dominating all of society through monetary means, and their names also happen to be John. Not only is John ranked high in society, but the other male that is mentioned in the story also happens to be a physician: “My brother is also a physician, and also of high standing” (Gilman 792). The

Open Document