The Pros And Cons Of Year-Round School

To Change a Tradition
While growing up, I attended a traditional school. This is a schooling method many individuals are probably familiar with. A student attends school for nine months out of the year, and then has a three month break during the summer. However, in my immediate hometown surroundings, nearby traditional schools are assessing the idea of transforming into year-round schools. Year round schooling is one subject debated in high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools nationwide. Are schools that operate 365 days a year academically better than traditional schools? What are the cost differences between the two? How would a year-round school effect families? Changing the schooling technique from traditional to year-round has numerous variables that need to be taken into consideration before any grade school or secondary education institution fully commits. Year-round schooling schedules should not be implemented and traditional schooling calendars should be maintained.
Before the argument, some misconceptions need to be clarified: Schools with the traditional school year have nine months of

The prime reason for this is because traditional schools do not need to spend extra money on air conditioning (Yeager). This is a necessity in the summer months, whereas heat is in the winter months. Neither the middle and elementary school nor the high school I attended has air conditioning throughout the school. Nor would they have the funds to install a system, for that matter. The reasoning being that my hometown schools recently underwent a vast repairing, renovating, and remodeling period. In addition, other costs of year-round schools would be accumulated through bus transportation and maintenance, lunch supplies, school daycare, extra utilities, and paying the staff for the summer months (Yeager). This would be especially true if schools decide to run on a multiple-track