Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Wwf uk reintroduction of wolves in yellowstone park
Why is it worth it to reintroduce gray wolves to yellowstone summary
Essays on wolf reintroduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Wwf uk reintroduction of wolves in yellowstone park
“The Wolves Are Back” “…and this is why the caribou and the wolf are one; for the caribou feeds the wolf, but it is the wolf that keeps the caribou strong”― Farley Mowat. This quote is a great example of the wolves keeping balance in nature, and the partnership between two different animals. The gray wolf was reintroduced to Yellowstone in 1995. They were reintroduced by the government due to the endangerment of their species. The reintroduction of the gray wolf was beneficial because it improved Yellowstone’s ecosystem, protected the wolves, and it attracted tourists. The wolf reintroduction to Yellowstone National Park improved the park’s ecosystem greatly! An example of this can be found in the article “In the Valley of the Wolves,” which states “Now, nearly a dozen years since the wolves returned, the recovery of that same system to its natural balance is well underway, says ecologists William Ripple and Robert Bescheta of Oregon State University” (“In the Valley”). The article explains that the ecosystem has started to recover and is continuing to recover because of the wolf reintroduction. Another example is from “In the Valley of the Wolves,” “… wolves affect elk; elk affect aspen; and therefore wolves affect aspen” (In the Valley”). In other words, if there were no wolves to eat the elk, there would be more elk eating the aspen, and aspen is a huge factor in Yellowstone’s ecosystem. Without the gray wolf, Yellowstone’s ecosystem might function, but not to the best of its abilities. In comparison, wolves were gone from Yellowstone for more than 70 years. While they were gone, the ecosystem continued to function properly. With the gray wolf returning, the ecosystem improved. Yellowstone depends on the gray wolf to hel... ... middle of paper ... ...ts. “Wolves are very resourceful. All they need to survive is for people to not shoot them” ― Bob Ferris. This is true; we are the ones who made them extinct, so it is our job to fix it. Works Cited. Arms, Karen. Point of View- “Where should the Wolves Roam?” Environmental Science. Austin, 2008. Print p. 216-217. Daerr, Elizabeth G. “A Howling Success. (Cover Story).” National Parks 74. 11/12 (2000): 24. MasterFILE Main Edition. Web. 8 Oct. 2013. Kirkwood, Scott. “Wolf (& Consequence.).” National Parks 80.1 (2006): 29. MasterFILE Main Edition. Web. 8 Oct. 2013. Lloyd, Janice. “Gray Wolf Population Declining in Yellowstone.” USATODAY. com 15 Dec. 2009. Web 17 Oct. 2013. "In the Valley of the Wolves Reintroduction of the Wolves." PBS. PBS, n.d. Web. http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/in-the-valley-of-the-wolves/reintroduction-of-the-wolves/213/.
This makes them seem less menacing and scary like the first article makes them look. Sharon Levy says in part "It is only in the two decades that biologists have started to build a clearer picture of wolf ecology….Instead of seeing rogue man-eaters and savage packs, we now understand that wolves have evolved to live in extended family groups.." (ll 19-22) This article also explains the positive overall effects of the wolves moving back to Yellowstone. Not only did the wolves have a new home filled with beautiful elk for prey they were also protected from hunters. This changed the attitude of the wolves as well as their population, of course their population grew and stayed more
Robbins, Jim. Last Refuge: The Environmental Showdown in Yellowstone and the American West. New York: Morrow, 1993. Print.
Ebert, Robert. "Dances With Wolves." Rev. of Dances With Wolves, dir. Kevin Costner. The Chicago Sun-Times 9 Nov. 1990.
1914 began the official war of the wolves. This year Congress officially approves funds for the eradication of wolves, cougars, and other destructive animals. Wolves were declared destructive to agricultural and big game interests and formally hunted. Nearly a century later, in 1995, wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park and Idaho's Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness(Phillips, 1996, p.20). The reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone National Park did not end the debate of whether wolves should stay or go. Advocates for wolf reintroduction say the wolves control elk and deer population numbers; preventing the destruction of ranchers cattle and the land. Opponents say the wolves kill elk and deer that could be hunted. Ranchers fear the wolves will kill their livestock decreasing profits.
Wolves are often portrayed as the villains but contrary to popular belief, wolves help the yellowstone park far more than they could harm it. Wolves have been introduced into the wild of Yellowstone after 70 years. A government act was finally passed, and brought wolves back to the beloved park. Although many ranchers in the area are opposed to the idea, the majority welcome wolves back to yellowstone. Wolves should be brought back to the national park yellowstone because they help the economy, improve the ecosystem, and create a better experience for visitors. Yellowstone made the right move bringing back wolves making yellowstone now a self balanced ecosystem.
Grey wolves were removed from USA’s Yellowstone National Park in 1926. A big impact of removing wolves were how the Aspen trees were slowly disappearing.After the wolves were gone beavers were scarce in the northern range, numbers of songbirds and habitats were reduced. The elk population skyrockets because the bears and the coyotes were left to hunt the elk but they do not kill as many elks as the wolves did. When the reintroduction of the wolves in 1995 there was a drastic difference in the landscape.
According the article “ Return of the Wolves”,are from Canada to the Yellowstone National Park. The were place on the endangered species list.
The United States’s war on wolves ended in the 1960s. By the 1970s, wolf sightings had become rare and awareness for the advocation of the species began to grow. Coincidentally, in 1973 the Endangered Species Act was passed. Just a mere year after, the wolves were declared as a protected species under the act. Efforts to restore wolf populations began to take full flight. In 1986, the first wolves to return into the United States, crossed from Canada and were dubbed “The Magic Pack.” The Gray wolves continued to grow in the United States on their own throughout the 1990s, growing around the Great Lakes and soon spreading into northern Wisconsin. They also began to be spotted in Washington State. In 1995 and 1996, Gray Wolves were reintroduced into Yellowstone National Park and also the Frank Church Wilderness of Idaho. Now, in the present, the Gray Wolf population has grown from 300 to over 4,000 wolves spread across Yellowstone National Park, northeast Oregon, Alaska, northern Michigan, northern Wisconsin, western Montana, and northern Idaho
Wolves have many threats to their successful existence for example: disease, natural disasters such as forest fires and floods and humans. Humans are the biggest threat to the wolf population (Wolf Biology and Behavior). We kill their food, we destroy their habitats, we see each other as threats. We have guns and they their instincts, both can be dangerous but the gun usually wins. Nowadays there are protection laws and we are not allowed to shoot wolves, unless they are attacking us, even then depending on the situation you may still receive fines.
I recently watched a video called: “How wolves changed Yellowstone Park”. The video was about how the reintroduction of wolves into the park caused substantial changes in the entire ecosystem. The park’s plant life immediately began to regrow at a rapid pace, animals that were previously scarce began rising in population, the physical land began to change as rivers filled and started meandering less. All of this, caused by one small act.
The wolf is not a danger to humans. This is because, in most parts of the world, there are no wolves. Also wolves do not want to attack an animal that is bigger then itself. Humans historical impact on wolves are almost putting them to extinction and bringing the wolves back to Yellowstone. One bad impact that humans have on wolves is when declines in prey brought the Gray Wolf near extinction in the near 20th century. This means that humans almost killed off the wolves by declining the prey that they can eat. One positive impact that the humans have on the Gray Wolves is that the humans reintroduced the Gray Wolf to Yellowstone National Park. Another negative impact that the humans had on the wolves is “To protect livestock, ranchers and government agencies began eradication campaigns”. This means that the ranchers and government agencies wanted to protect their livestock and begin getting rid of all of the wolves near their land. A very bad
The wolves’ were hunted in late 1800 s’ and early 1900‘s in the United States because farmers wanted more land for their cattle’s to graze upon. As farmers were moving out west they felt threaten that the wolves would hunt their cattles so the farmers thought that the best solution would be to take them out of the picture. This was possible because at the time there were no government regulations on hunting....
In “Scared to Death,” Ed Yong tells us about the affect wolves have had on the elk population. This comes after the absence of wolves in Yellowstone. Yong says, “In January 1995, the grey wolves returned to Yellowstone national Park, almost 70 years after they had been exterminated by an over enthusiastic predator-control program,” (ll1-2). This new introduction of wolves has had monumetous effect on the overly populated elk. John Laundre, who had been watching the elk, describes this effect in a very controversial way. Yong says, “To describe this psychological environment, Laundre coined the term “landscape of fear,” (ll19-20). Launder gives several reasons for this unusual idea.
The incidence of kill rate among domesticated animals by wolves has risen over 50% in the last twenty years in Minnesota (Bill). Barber Meyer states “the wolves are getting more aggressive” (Meyer). W. Tom says “that it is just part of the life cycle” (Tom). Yes it is true about the life cycle, but what is going to happen when there is not enough food for all of the wolves in the woods? They start coming into towns and small cities looking for food.
Wolves have a life, that helps humans. Don’t take it. To begin with, wolves help keep prey under control. Also, the more wolves that people kill, the more livestock that wolves will kill. To conclude, they have positive effects on the environment. To summarize, there are many reasons why people shouldn’t kill wolves, these are only a few!