Analysis Of John Proctor In The Crucible

1052 Words3 Pages

In Act 1 Miller reveals the mannerisms and characteristics of the people of Salem. However, with the introduction of John Proctor nearing the end of Act 1 the reader can clearly contradistinguish that he is seemly divergent to the traditional system of Salem. Through the progression of the Act 1 and 2 Proctor becomes increasing more articulated about his beliefs. However, this is done in such a way that he leaves his answers open for interpretation. It is prominent when Hale is questioning him due to suspicion of witchcraft within Salem. Hale states: “It’s said you hold no belief that there may even be witches in world.” Proctor replies with an opened ended answer: “I know not what I have said, I may have said it.” Here we can see that Proctor …show more content…

Proctor has been identified as the protagonist of the play. With being the protagonist comes representation of a leader figure. In the context of the play he is the leader figure for change. Proctor sets the foundations of change by making people aware of the flaws of the traditional system. To his surprise John Hale of Beverley, an expert on witchcraft can recognise his way of thinking of being rational and critical. Evidence for this is when Elizabeth is taken away and Proctor questions Hale. He prompts Hale enquiring why the accuser who is always considered innocent. At this point in the play the beginning of the transformation of Hale happens. John Hale starts to become less certain of the accusations of witchcraft something that is he has built his very own profession on. This evidence identifies that Proctor is the protagonist of change. He has converted John Hale’s holistic perspective of Salem; Hale sees now witchcraft as an invisible crime, which can be forged and could be perceived as personal vengeance. Articulating the perspective that Salem functions on lies and fabrication. The effect that is given off is enlightenment of the true way the court system operates. The message that Miller has successfully conveyed to the reader is that a common man such as John Proctor can achieve change if executed properly. Miller has made it clear that Proctor knows before change is achieved on a large scale you need backing power from the support of others. Miller has demonstrated this through the transformation of John Hale in his perspective of the court

Open Document