The Value Of Life In Shakespeare's Hamlet

1119 Words3 Pages

The value of life is a very controversial topic. It has been brought up many times throughout history in interviews, poem, stories, and even class. Many people have different opinions on what the value of life is and what it is worth. Unfortunately there is no denotative definition. It is connotative, which can only be defined through personal experiences and beliefs. Many highly intelligent people have different views on the value of life and express it in whatever way they can.
Hamlet asked a the question whether living through his troubles was worth it. In William Shakespeare 's Hamlet soliloquy, Hamlet opened the text with a question: “to be, or not to be?” (Shakespeare). I believe that Hamlet was asking whether it would be better to kill himself or to continue along with the problems he had. Hamlet was dealing with the murder of his father that may have been committed by his stepfather. His views showed to be in favor of committing suicide and that it would be a quick and easy way to end all his problems. As Hamlet wonders his thoughts about suicide, he came upon the …show more content…

Roger Ebert was a multi talented usually dealing with writing. In fact, writing was his new way of having a voice. Ebert was diagnosed with cancer in his salivary glands and thyroid, which eventually led to the removal of his lower jaw and the loss of the ability to eat, drink or speak. Even though Ebert has faced a life downing situation his attitude has increased positively about life. How Ebert values life is shown when he said “I believe that if, at the end of it all, according to our abilities, we have done something to make others a little happier, and something to make ourselves a little happier, that is about the best we can do. to make others less happy is a crime. To make ourselves unhappy is where all crime starts” (Ebert). Life to him was not to fall to defeat. It was to do what you love and enjoy life as much as

Open Document