Savannah State University
July 19, 2016
Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury was a Federalist from Maryland, and a successful business man. Former President John Adams gave him the position of a Midnight Judge right before he left office. Things did not go as planned and the next president Marbury v. Madison just may be the most important court case in the history of the Supreme Court, this case which took place in 1803 established that certain acts were deemed unconstitutional. Marbury v. Madison was the first case to relate judicial review, which is a process which the executive and legislative branches of government are reviewed and may possibly undergo invalidation by the judicial branch. Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Before the Supreme Court branches of government could do basically anything they wanted to. This particular case would change the judicial system forever. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. The three branches of Government made it so that no person had so much power.
The best-known force of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the capacity of the Court to pronounce a Legislative or Executive act infringing upon the Constitution, is not found inside the content of the Constitution itself. The Court established judicial review during Marbury v. Madison in 1803. Judicial review is very vital in society. A higher level court has to review cases that involve other laws and that go against the constitution. Checks and Balances co...
... middle of paper ...
...ms no rule for his government?” I think that is another argument Marshall had because he had problems with the way things were being done. The constitution should rule in favor of everyone not just a selected few. Marbury v. Madison was a very popular case because it made judicial review more relevant and checks and balances were applied. Judicial review made things fare and after it is all said and done things will not be unconstitutional and justice will be served.
About the Supreme Court. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2016.
Constitution. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2016, from http://constitution.laws.com/the-supreme-court/judicial-review
John Marshall (1755-1835). (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2016
What is meant by the doctrine of judicial review? (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2016
Marbury v. Madison: A Progressive Critique. (n.d.). Retrieved July 20, 2016
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “You are a product of your environment. So choose the environment that will best develop you toward your objective.” (Stone, 1962) The words stated prior by William Clement Stone have never proved to be more accurate. A person’s place of living, whether chosen, suggested, or forced, has a great affect on their future years to come. Depending on a person’s environment, they can succeed or fail; linger around or progress. The further proceedings do not serve the purpose to “knock” or bring shame or favor to one geographical area.... [tags: Maryland vs. Texas]
863 words (2.5 pages)
- Born October 30, 1945, Gregory Mears Bailey Sr., my grandfather is from Baltimore, Maryland. His mother, Myrtle Elizabeth Dalton Bailey was born in Greenwood, South Carolina and father, Henry Saile Bailey was born in Baltimore, Maryland. Myrtle moved to Baltimore to study nursing, but after meeting Henry she left school to raise her family. While raising his family Henry worked at Armco Steel as a steel worker. Gregory has seven brothers and sisters, Eddie, Myrtle, Matthew, Del, Mildred, Melvin, and Marie all of which were born in Baltimore Maryland.... [tags: Family, High school, Maryland, Baltimore]
1704 words (4.9 pages)
- After winning the Revolutionary War and sovereign control of their home country from the British, Americans now had to deal with a new authoritative issue: who was to rule at home. In the wake of this massive authoritative usurpation, there were two primary views of how the new American government should function. Whereas part of the nation believed that a strong, central government would be the most beneficial for the preservation of the Union, others saw a Confederation of sovereign state governments as an option more supportive of the liberties American’s fought so hard for in the Revolution.... [tags: Federalist & Antifederalist Positions]
2017 words (5.8 pages)
- On September 17, 1787, the Philadelphia Convention sent their new constitution to the states for ratification. The Federalists highly approved of the Constitution because it allowed for a more central and powerful government that was previously undermined under the Articles of Confederation. The Anti-Federalists, however, didn’t want a powerful central government, but, instead, powerful state governments; in response to the Constitution, many Anti-Federalists began writing essays and creating pamphlets as a means of arguing against it.... [tags: Federalist Papers]
739 words (2.1 pages)
- Federalist Papers 10 and 51 served to explain the union as a safeguard against factions and insurrection and to explain how the structure of this new union must encompass the ability to furnish proper checks and balances between the different departments within itself respectively. These articles contain absolutely no higher meaning concerning Plato’s beliefs of the True, Good and the Beautiful. The articles are merely rhetoric used to rationalize the benefits of a new system, explain how the new union will be constructed and most crucial to the essays, sway public opinion to support the ratification of the new constitution.... [tags: The Federalist Papers]
733 words (2.1 pages)
- Frustration was mounting. As he sat in the North Carolina ratifying convention and listened to the roll call of their membership, William Richardson Davie must have worried that the federalist movement in his state would die a slow and agonizing death before him. Davie, an ardent proponent of federalism and its promotion of a strong national and central government, had spent nearly a year arguing and debating the necessity and importance of ratifying the newly-proposed federal Constitution. The membership’s list of names forebode trouble for Davie and his federalist colleagues and he realized as the names were read aloud that the convention’s membership favored those who opposed the federal... [tags: north carolina, federalist movement]
2684 words (7.7 pages)
- The Federalist Papers and Government Today In The Federalist Papers by James Madison, Madison discuses various aspects of government and how the government must be organized in order to better represent the people. In The Federalist, No. 10 Madison discusses the nature of political factions and parties and how they can affect the government and its practices. The Federalist, No. 51 discusses instead how the government being in branches helps maintain liberties and better protect the American people.... [tags: Political party, Democracy, Federalist No. 10]
1034 words (3 pages)
- Aristotle's Legacy in the Federalist Papers While the government of the United States owes its existence to the contents and careful thought behind the Constitution, some attention must be given to the contributions of a series of essays called the Federalist Papers towards this same institution. Espousing the virtues of equal representation, these documents also promote the ideals of competent representation for the populace and were instrumental in addressing opposition to the ratification of the Constitution during the fledgling years of the United States.... [tags: Federalist Papers Essays]
2064 words (5.9 pages)
- Alexander Hamilton’s First Federalist Paper Alexander Hamilton’s first Federalist Paper endorses ratification of the proposed constitution. His unifying point is that the use of reason—in the form of the people’s "reflection and choice"—will lead to the truth, whereas their use of passion will lead to ruin. Hamilton attempts to persuade his readers to make the correct decision by reminding them of the sheer importance of the matter. He suggests that "good men" will want to make the correct choice in light of their "true interests" (33), while the adversaries of the Constitution will be ruled by passions, deceit, and even weak minds.... [tags: Federalist Papers]
1086 words (3.1 pages)
- McCulloch vs. Maryland John Marshall was a prominent figure in the history of the United States as the man who helped shape the Supreme Court to the power it is today. His decisions strengthened the power of the federal government in period of growth for our new nation and established a greater purpose for the Supreme Court. Born September 24, 1755 in Virginia, he went on to attend the college of William and Marry, which became his only formal education. Early in the revolutionary war, he served under the Third Virginia Continental Regiment, rising through the ranks to lieutenant and captain.... [tags: Papers]
1052 words (3 pages)