William Benoit's Theory Of Image Restoration Conflicts

811 Words2 Pages

The Theory of Restoration
Despite the abundance of strategies available, researchers have found that William Benoit’s theory of image restoration—later titled image repair—offers a more useful framework for the understanding of corporate crisis situations (Benoit, 1997). Considered the dominant paradigm for image repair discourse, the theory of image restoration is grounded under the premises that communication is a “goal-directed activity.” The first goal aims to maintain one’s favorable image, while the second goal aims to restore or protect one’s reputation (Benoit, 1995, p. 63-71). To ensure these goals where met, Benoit designed a typology that provided crisis communication practitioners with five general defense strategies to employ (separately or collectively) during a crisis to mitigate and or repair damages created by a crisis. Those strategies are: (1) denial, (2) evading responsibility, (3) reducing offensiveness, (4) corrective action, and (5) mortification. …show more content…

In Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies, simple denial is defined as “a dismissal of the fact that the event occurred, was negative or that the entity/rhetor was connected to the event” (Benoit, 1995; Len-Ríos & Benoit, 2004). Benoit states this strategy can be applied when an organization feels that it has done nothing wrong. In this case, the organization will either deny the crisis, its involvement in the crisis or that the crisis was harmful to others. The second variant, shifting the blame, is where an organization makes a decision to place the responsibility of their actions on another. Within this denial form, a third variant exist called separation. In order to employ the separation strategy, an organization must separate its self from the accused and establish that the accused acted in their own accord, without authority, in order to preserve the organization’s

Open Document