As a result of recent findings, scientists and modern commenters are now withdrawing most of their previous accusations against Wikipedia. Not only are critics realizing that its articles and information are void of numerous errors, but also are witnessing the rapidly increasing use of the site, compared to that of the Encyclopedia Britannica. One such columnist, Cecil Adams, recently withdrew his former accusation towards the free encyclopedia: “Quit with the it because from the standpoint of reliability, Wikipedia might as well be written by gorillas”(Adams). Critics, like Adams, were forced to change their views because of a recent journal that compared articles from both Wikipedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica. The journal, Nature, found out that out of forty-two articles analyzed by experts, both references contained the same amount of major errors, establishing the fact that the free encyclopedia is as near accurate as the Encyclopedia Britannica (Wolchover). Thus Wikipedia’s accuracy is better than what most reviewers thought would be.
... middle of paper ...
...information but also to allow other users to keep the truth in check. So indirectly, the website has created an amazing hobby for many people: to donate and safeguard the truth. Therefore, Wikipedia is a very popular source of information not only because of its efficiency, but also because of its uniqueness.
Adams, Cecil. Interview by Conrad. The Straight Dope. The Chicago Reader, 13 July 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.
Ashman, Matthew. “Students debate value of Wikipedia as reliable source”. Daily Sundial. California State University, 26 March 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.
Northern Essex Community College. “Wikipedia: Pros and Cons”. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.
Silverman, Matt. “Encyclopedia Britannica vs. Wikipedia”. Mashable.com. 16 March 2012. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.
Wolchover, Natalie. "How Accurate Is Wikipedia?" LiveScience.com. 24 Jan. 2011. Web. 28 Nov. 2013.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Wikipedia has been the subject of considerable debate for some time now. Some think the site is not quotable, while others argue that it is. Many teachers do not accept Wikipedia pages as a source of information, because anybody can add information to such pages. However, this policy of everybody being able to add has changed, and the present-day Wikipedia team works hard to prevent inaccuracies on their website. Wikipedia pages nowadays indicate the sources of information. Moreover, Wikipedia pages are checked on inaccuracies.... [tags: Encyclopedia, Wikipedia, persuasive, internet]
1086 words (3.1 pages)
- In the paper “Awareness and Coordination in Shared Workspaces” written by Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti, the authors describe awareness as: “an understanding of the activities of others, which provides a context for your own activity” (Dourish 107). This concept appears several times in the various Wikipedia research papers. We can also see that as Wikipedia changes and evolves one of the key aspects of successful awareness, passive awareness rather than active awareness, is potentially being eroded.... [tags: Wikipedia]
1803 words (5.2 pages)
- Drought From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Drought (disambiguation). Contraction/Desiccation cracks in dry earth (Sonoran desert, Mexico). A drought is a period of below-average precipitation in a given region, resulting in prolonged shortages in its water supply, whether atmospheric, surface water or ground water. A drought can last for months or years, or may be declared after as few as 15 days. It can have a substantial impact on the ecosystem and agriculture of the affected region and harm to the local economy. Annual dry seasons in the tropics significantly increase the chances of a drought developing and subsequent bush fires.... [tags: Water, Precipitation, Climate, Drought]
1421 words (4.1 pages)
- A Stand Against Wikipedia As Wikipedia has become more and more popular with students, some professors have become increasingly concerned about the online, reader-produced encyclopedia. While plenty of professors have complained about the lack of accuracy or completeness of entries, and some have discouraged or tried to bar students from using it. “As educators, we are in the business of reducing the dissemination of misinformation,” said Don Wyatt, chair of the department. “Even though Wikipedia may have some value, particularly from the value of leading students to citable sources, it is not itself an appropriate source for citation,” he said.... [tags: Wikipedia Education School]
1197 words (3.4 pages)
- Since its inception in 2001, Wikipedia has become the fifth most popular website in the world, with almost half a billion readers per month. According to The Economist, 15% of all internet users in the world visit Wikipedia on any given day. Wikipedia is also massive in size, spanning 287 languages, with more than 4 million articles in its English version alone. Comparatively, that is 1,600 times as many articles as the Encyclopedia Britannica. (“Wikipeaks”) The Wikimedia Foundation - the non-profit organization that runs Wikipedia - only employs about 170 people, but what it lacks in paid workers it makes up for in volunteers: Wikipedia has its own community of about 76,000 unpaid editors... [tags: wikimedia, irresponsible and flaw web]
1559 words (4.5 pages)
- A Wikipedia is an information source for many students (Coughlan, 2011), used for research on almost every subject. Some people call it “frequently unreliable” while others name it to be the epitome of the information age (Andrews 2007) yet the truth is that, whether students and teachers, like to admit it or not, Wikipedia is a vast source of knowledge, with readability second to none (Coughlan, 2011). However because of its wide usage and the fact that it is a wiki, it can be edited by anyone, schools are often reluctant to accept it as a valid source of information for essays or school work and some take it to the extreme; “14% of schools block Wikipedia” (Fleming 2011).... [tags: Persuasive, Valid or Unreliable Source ]
996 words (2.8 pages)
- Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia, which contains open articles that can be edited by a number of users. The site prides itself on providing un-biases information from a neutral point of view (NPov). However, since the general public provides the majority of information, it is difficult to know how accurate the information truly is. The article that will be reviewed and analyzed contains information about the events of September 11, 2001 as well as how wiki can be used as a learning tool. The opening line of the article states “the September 11 attacks were a series of four coordinated terrorist attacks launched by the Islamic terrorist group al-Qaeda upon the United States in New York Ci... [tags: basic online sources of information]
1072 words (3.1 pages)
- Badke (2008) begins his article reminding us that Wikipedia although controversial is still the online encyclopedia of choice by 36% of the United States population according to Pew Internet & American Life Project’s findings. (As quoted by Badke, para. 1) Even if the public likes it, though, for the most part academic circles do not. Many professors will not allow their students to use Wikipedia. These professors think Wikipedia is trivial, untrustworthy, insulting, and too often completely incorrect.... [tags: Website Review]
879 words (2.5 pages)
- Today, with all of the advances in technology, our society always looks for ways to make life more efficient for people. However, this common ambition of people seemingly does not apply to the scholarly/educational world. It seems that there has been a reoccurring dispute amongst classrooms over the use of Wikipedia as a reference in research papers. Regardless of what most scholars think, the time has come that society accepts this new type of software as a credible resource of information in our educational journey.... [tags: Internet]
1371 words (3.9 pages)
- Inevitable Grief in Not Yet, Jayette In the short story "Not Yet, Jayette" by William Boyd, Charlie, the narrator and main character, describes a day in his life, and tries to understand, what is going on with him, and where and when his life took a turn towards misery. He states: "It seems to me that everybody in their life is at least two people. Once when you're a child, and once when you're an adult. It's the saddest thing." We will now try to see how this statement relates to his life, and whether or not this phenomenon can be said to be symptomatic for our culture.... [tags: Not Yet Jayette Essays]
736 words (2.1 pages)