Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Internet regulations
Internet regulations
Forms of internet regulations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Internet regulations
‘’Why should I care?’’ contrary to what people would have you believe is a fair question, and often the correct answer is you shouldn’t. This is the age of the 24 hour news cycle, where any fool with a word processor and an internet connection (ahem) can and will write a blog on any niche subject from the odd to the downright bizarre. I am of the opinion that quite a bit of the information being shovelled around is only worthy of apathy. Trouble is with the sheer volume of issues that we are asked to care about on a daily basis how do we know that we’ve made the right decision. Well, rest easy the aim of this… well, I haven’t exactly nailed down what this is yet, is to shuck the wheat from the chaff.
Now to the first topic as selected by my lovely assistant Brianna is… drum roll… (There was no drum roll) ‘’Net Neutrality’’ Ok for those of you who are unaware of the concept net neutrality is the belief that governments and companies should treat all data on the internet equally regardless of its source, And not favour or block websites/products. Simple right, okay so let’s look at what that actually means. Without neutrality your internet provider has no obligation allow you to equal access information, especially if it’s contrary to their interests for example they might own or have made a deal with a video streaming site which they would prefer you use. So they might add an additional charge to use another similar site, In effect forcing a change in the flow of customers and money to their choice not yours. So what’s the problem? Some people myself included have this silly notion that the internet should be a level playing field and that by allowing fair competition people will choose the service they want. Overall everything I...
... middle of paper ...
... socialists, liberals, greens and other left blocs. While I won’t go into the details of the language, let’s face fact it was legislation passed through the European parliament it’s long winded and boring as watching painted grass grow dry (or something like that). Anyway this move has being widely praised.
So now we have my short summary and view on the subject, I suppose it’s time we get to the point at hand, should you care? This is the Information age like the Bronze and Iron Age before; it was named for the substance that would shape it. Whoever controls the flow of information controls the world, the ability to frame the context around news stories and issues is an incredible power one that we should be wary of. In conclusion yes you should care about net neutrality but if you find yourself bringing it up too often you’ll run the risk of becoming that guy.
With the various political figures who are shown in this video, a variety of interests and opinions are bound to come forth, often conflicting with one another. There are many figures who support Brian and Caitlin’s
When we think of those skilled in the art of rhetoric, we often jump to those we know are trying to convince us of something, like politicians, salesmen, lawyers, etc. We do not always consider corporate CEOs part of that group though Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings, would have us believing another thing. On March 20th, 2014, Hastings published an article titled “Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality” on Netflix’s official blog. Just under a month before the blog was posted, Netflix settled a deal paying Comcast, America’s largest cable and Internet service provider (ISP), for faster and more reliable service to Comcast’s subscribers (Cohen and Wyatt). These “internet tolls” go against the culture of net neutrality in America, which in its essence is when no piece of information is prioritized over another on broadband networks. Hastings took to their blog to advocate for net neutrality and against abusive ISPs. Whether he was conscious of his rhetorical finesse or not, he wrote quite convincingly thus turning this blog into an excellent rhetorical artifact. Reed Hastings’ blog post aims to convince American Internet consumers that strong net neutrality is important by appealing to their values of choice, frugality and empathy while simultaneously making ISPs seem ill intentioned and Netflix seem honorable.
‘Illiberal’ policies are not necessarily undemocratic: they can be enacted by legitimate actors, supported by voters, but contravene constitutional limits, freedoms and other liberal ideals. In CEE, there is concern over the rise of populist parties and rhetoric. This essay uses Mudde’s conception of political populism: a ‘thin-centered’ ideology where society is separated into two dichotic groups: ‘pure people’ versus ‘corrupt elite’. Characteristics of populist parties include supporting direct democracy and primacy of national politics. Ideas are often presented through emotions, not alternative policies. A rise in illiberal policies and populism may occur because of weakening EU conditionalities post-accession: previously the EU held leverage over states and conditionalities led to them to enact policies that were not necessarily beneficial. Upon joining the EU, these changes can be reversed and other policies enacted without the penalties.
The emergence of the Internet and the World Wide Web brought upon a medium of communication with a range of opportunities for the world. However, this medium is, in due course, subject to the control of a few major companies. The enigma of information flow is the central concern of net neutrality. Consumers, competition and network owners would benefit directly from the regulation of network neutrality because it would provide a positive impact to those parties as well as provide equality.
Net Neutrality requires to give everyone access to everything on the internet. This means that your internet provider won’t charge you for using specific websites. But with this, companies will have the ability to charge you for using basic things such as email, Spotify and even YouTube. Fast and slow lanes will also be included which may vary depending of what packages you paid for. But that is just the beginning, being that with this they will be able to control what you are able to see and not, ending Freedom of Speech in the
Many people have no interest in current events in the world or even their own country, and are more concerned about matters that are more trivial, and even if they were to pay a deal of attention, common news sources are often biased and don’t release information that would hurt a certain cause. It is in this way that the citizens are kept igno...
Tom Newton Dunn, ‘Go to the war on the Eurom Law’ The Sun, 7 February 2011accessed 29 March 2011 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3395471/David-Cameron-urged-to-go-to-war-over-Euro-law.html
The debate of Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo is about whether keep network neutrality. The Network Neutrality is about principle “non-discriminatory interconnection”, it refers that all users of the network should be received equal treatment. The Tim Wu is a supporter of network neutrality, he states the internet more like a highway rather than a fast food restaurant, so it should remain neutral. Because basic on the transportation and communication network should within scope of public interest, not on the individual difference. But the Christopher Yoo as a opponent thinks even if deviations the network neutrality there will not be necessarily damage users and innovation and then he suggests an alternative approach called “network
When analysts criticise the lack of democratic legitimacy in the EU they generally point to the mode of political representation and the nature of policy outputs. Only one branch of the EU is directly elected is the European Parliament. Though stronger than it once was, the EP remains is actually only one of four major actors in the EU policy-making process. The EP is a body without power or accountability, and easily dismissed just as a ‘talking shop’ (Colin Pilkington.) Only 75% of its amendments are accepted by the Commission and the Council of Ministers.
...: Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (4), pp. 603-24.
Net neutrality was the big talk towards the end of 2017. Taking away net neutrality would cause chaos in my opinion. Making schools and other organizations pay to use technology only discourages them from doing so which is a major step backwards in such a technological point in time. The world is constantly creating new ways to implement technology to our everyday lives and charging us to do so is not a step in the right direction. Saying that getting rid of net neutrality will do away with discrimination is absurd. Discrimination was around way before the internet was but instead we once again have one political party trying to undermine the other by playing the victim. I do agree that it isn’t right that such huge corporations such as
Finally, in the fifth claim about policy drift Moravcsik highlights that the decision in the EU is to centrist and both left wing parties and right wing parties are skeptics about EU policies. This happens because of “there are high threshold for the adoption of EU policies: unanimity in the Council, or a majority in the Commission plus a qualified majority in the Council plus an absolute majority in the European Parliament and then judicial review by national courts and the European Court of Justice” (Hix & Follesdal 2006:540).
Well, my day starts when I wake up from my daily nightmares about the FCC's ridiculous rollback of net neutrality laws. This move, pushed by Ajit Pai, was directly tied to the economy due to its intent: to allow ISPs the "freedom" to throttle internet traffic in such a way that certain services and companies (provided that they can pay) receive preferential and unfair treatment in the form of faster internet speeds than competitors. For example, if Netflix decides to pay Comcast for faster internet speed than Netflix's competitor Hulu, Comcast has the legal go-ahead to throttle Hulu into oblivion because no consumer is going to want to pay for laggy TV shows. Thanks, FCC.
Lelieveldt, H. and Princen, S. 2011The politics of the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
“From time to time it is worth reminding ourselves why twenty-seven European nation states have come together voluntarily to form the partnership that is the European Union.” 1