Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
itical reflection on life expectancy between men and women
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Life expectancy, or the estimated years of life for a person or group of people, has increased over the years but it is still surprisingly lower than expected in places such as the United States. America ranks twenty-fourth on the life expectancy list under Japan, Australia, France Spain and Italy. What causes this disparity in the ranking and statistics in an advanced industrialized society such as the United States? There are major statistical factors that influence the United States ranking in world life expectancy, involving education level, poverty, race and gender. The diverse groups of people living in the United States affect the health statistics negatively, bringing in influences from education and income levels, race and geography.
In most of the world, women outlive men. They live an average of 6 years more than the male gender for an average of 80.1 years though an average of 12 years in common in Belarus, a country in Eastern Europe (Tischler 2007). Life expectancy has increased almost equally among the gender however, with an increase in 9.3 years for women and 9.4 for men. Men are three times more likely to die from injuries, homicide or suicide than women are (Tischler 2007). Men have higher rates of accidents (49% for males compared to 21% for females), heart disease (11% for males to 9% for females), HIV (10% for males to 7% for females), suicide (20% for males to 5% for females) and homicide (19% for males to 6% for females), however, women have a higher rate of cancer (17% for females to 10% for males) (Tischler 2007). Oddly enough left handed men have a higher rate of accidents than right handed men and also have been calculated to have a lower life expectancy than right handed males (Coren 1992). Men are ...
... middle of paper ...
...through healthier habits.
The United States consists of many diverse groups of people and the health statistics include groups such as African Americans, Native Americans and inner city populations, all which are known to have severely poor developing health. Health problems such as HIV, heart disease, cancer and obesity affect more of the population than in other similarly developed countries such as Japan, Australia, France, Spain and Italy. This lowers the predicted life expectancy of a developed country such as the United States and brings the ranking to twenty-fourth on the world rankings.
Works Cited
Tischler, H. L. (2007). Socialization and Development. Introduction to sociology (9th ed., pp. 99-101). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Coren, S. (1992). The left-hander syndrome: the causes and consequences of left-handedness. New York: Free Press
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are increasingly becoming a major problem of Public Health around the World. The impact of resources and material deprivation among people and populations has resulted in an increase in mortality rate on a planetary scale. Social determinants of health are defined as the personal, social, economic and the environmental conditions which determines the health status of an individual or population (Gardner, 2013). Today’s society is characterized by inequalities in health, education, income and many other factors which as a result is becoming a burden for Public Health around the world. Research studies have shown that the conditions in which people live and work strongly influenced their health. Individuals with high levels of education and fall within the high income bracket turn to have stable jobs, live in the best neighborhood and have access to quality health care system than individuals who have low education and fall with the low income bracket. This paper is to explain different social determinants of health and how they play ...
“‘Sinister Children’” was the title psychologist Theodore Blau gave to left-handed children in the late seventies, due to their over abundance “among the academically and behaviorally challenged” and their greater vulnerability to obtaining mental diseases later in life (1). This condescending view on the left-handed population has existed for centuries. The word sinister itself comes from the Latin word sinistra, meaning left hand. In the article “Sinister Minds: Are Left-Handed People Smarter?,” written by Maria Konnikova, a psychologist from Columbia University, she explains how these outdated theories about the intellect of the left-handed community are wrong. In fact, the author elaborates how left-handed people may have higher brain abilities compared to the general population due to the
...an, P., Egerter, S., & Williams, D. R. (2011). The social determinants of health: coming
ONE DAY. If you can manage to do only half of everything left-handed for that day, you MIGHT BEGIN to understand the seemingly small ‘inconveniences’ suffered by the left-handed on a daily basis” (Dossey 12). Many people may glance at this challenge and find it pointless, highlighting exactly the point Weems makes: that the majority of people don’t realize the struggles of living in a world where people simply assume right-handedness. The stamp of left-handedness appears to also bring the stamp of unworthiness in regards to ease of living, since left-handed people have no trouble finding enemies in the most commonplace of activities. Cooking, for instance, requires lefties to run the risk of injuring themselves meals after meal. Appliance such as can openers, peelers, corkscrews, and soup ladles all force lefties to manipulate their hands in a way where failure prevails more often than success. If only manufacturers took the time to construct items suitable for lefties, or at least appliances equally suitable for both hand preferences, left-handed people would not have to spend just as much time in the kitchen worrying as they do cooking. However, in a world in which profit trumps quality, lefties continue to receive the short end of the stick, overlooked and under appreciated for the skills they could bring
- - -. “Social-learning Theory:Observing and Imitating Models.” Human Development. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1992. 213-14. Print.
Harro, B. (2010). The cycle of socialization. In M. Adams, W. Blumenfeld, C. Castaneda, H. Hackman, M. Peters, and X. Zuniga (Eds), Readings for diversity and social justice, (2nd ed). (pp.157-164). New York Routledge.
Almost Ten percent of the population is left-handed. Growing up being left handed has forced me to adapt to situations that were simple for a right handed person. In my early childhood, I was forced to use my right hand when I would use a computer mouse. When it was time to write in our notebooks I was always aggravated with the metal spiral rubbing against my hand in my notebook. Once I reached high school, the desk was another change I had to adapt to; the desks were made for right handed people. It allowed them to rest their elbow while writing, Left-handers do not have an elbow rest. Left-handed people are struck with problems all around the world today in ways of non-compatible product design, forced right handed learning, and receiving
Current research has demonstrated that females, on average, have a larger deep limbic system than males. Due to the larger limbic brain, woman are more in touch with their feelings, they are generally better to express their feelings than men (“Male-Female Brain Differences”). Women are the primary care takers for children because of their strong ability to be connected and bond well with others. Containing a larger limbic system also leaves a female more likely to become depressed. As stated in “Male-Female Difference”, women attempt suicide three times more than men, but men actually succeed three times more than women. This h...
The argument does not give any support to show that the national life expectancy is the same as the actual life duration of Americans. It could be the case that the national life expectancy is inaccurate and much
Current new articles have stated that the average life expectancy can easily become 100 years. The Life expectancy rate has seemed to increase around three months every year. “Centenarians may become the norm.” Scientists and doctors at Buck Institute in Marin County, California, have spent countless hours studying ways to expand the life of an organism. They already have been able to quintuple the life span of worms. With devoted research and tests, the Institute may be able to expand to human beings (Easterbrook). The question is, how will a longer life affect our economy? Social security would raise, forcing we the people to work harder and longer to make money to support our families. The three options that can give the working class a
Socialization interested me as I learned about society and how to view society using the sociological perspective. As expected socialization is a very open topic and returned many results in my search for credible material. I decided to begin by defining socialization with the help of the book Handbook of Socialization (Grusec & Hastings, 2016), which discussed various concepts of socialization and the process.
Technology in terms of medicine has also increased the life expectancy of the average person. With new technological advancements in surgeries, medicines and treatments the average life expectancy is still on the increase. A recent study shows that the average life span for 2004 of a United States Citizen is 77.4 years old. This has increased significantly from 1900 where the average lifespan for a male was 48.2 and for the female 51.5. Thanks to technology we can now live longer.
Wade, Bourgeault, and Neiterman (2016) acknowledge sex and gender differences in health are between biological and socially constructed between men and women. The power relations are evident in gender and health, the relationship of men and women in a system of patriarchy, and gender-based inequality cause an imbalance of power. Wade et al., (2016) suggest that everyone is “doing gender”, creating difference between how men and women interact in social setting. The ideas of masculinity and femininity are socially constructed and as individuals we have be constructed into those roles. Gender is seen as a powerful social construction that shapes our behaviours, but also the social condition that we live and experience every day. Wade et al., (2016) discusses the gender differences in morbidity and mortality. Wade et al., (2016) explains the historically, women had shorter life expectancy than men because of maternal death, poor nutrition and low status of women in society. Overtime, the overall life expectancy has increase because the improvements of public health and such. Though, women live longer than men, they are getting more chronic illness and disability than men, especially depression. In terms of death, the leading cause for both men and women is cancer and heart disease; men are more likely to pass away from accidents and unintentional injuries because of risk taking and more physical
The Sociological use (E1). “Socialization is defined as the process of assisting young people to become members of society by giving them social skills close to virtues. In other words, one can rightly define socialization as ‘grooming a child into being a member of society”. All this ideally ought to happen by persuasion and not by coercion; this tends to suggest that
Socialization “is the process through which we are taught and trained to behave in society or in particular social settings. It is how we come to understand the expectations and norms of our group” (Manza, n.d., p. 100). Most of the work that I do with preschool children is based upon socialization. I am teaching these children who often come to school without ever being around other children, how to socialize or work together with others in the group. I teach them what the norms are in the classroom and what expected behavior (or what it not expected) is within the group, classroom and school setting. It’s the same within societal environments. We learn social norms through the on-going process of socialization. According to the text The Sociology Project, “Some of the most exiting ideas about socialization were developed by the French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu (1930-2002). Bourdieu argued that socialization works most powerfully through the development of a set of specific habits, or what he called our habitus” (Manza, n.d, p.102). Our “habitus” becomes important in this discussion when we consider that everyone has a different upbringing and different experiences that can shape their “habitus”. (Manza, 102) Therefore “Children born into poor families, with parents who have little education, will grow up with one kind of habitus. Middle-class children, and very rich and privileged children, will grow up with yet different kinds of habituses. In this way, Bourdieu enlarged the meaning of class differences to include more than just how much money people have. In other words, the differences between the m idle and upper classes also include all those things contained in the habitus, including tastes, dispositions, and ways of carrying yourself” (Manza, n.d., p.102). Hence, money or lack thereof is not the only determining factor in differentiating classes of people. How people act as