Historically, realism has been the dominant theory of International Relations which explains the fundamental features of international politics, inevitably associated with conflict and war (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 36). Basically, there are two approaches of realism; classical realism and neorealism. Classical realists strongly emphasize on historical reality and takes its principles, orientations and practice from the account of history (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 37). In contrast, neorealism is based on a scientific method by examining economic theory and philosophy of science rather than historical reflection (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 41). In addition, power is central to realist perspectives of International Relations because it is crucial for the understanding of two principal issues: who can be expected to win a conflict? And, related to this, who governs international politics? (Guzzini, 2013, pp. 47). According to Morgenthau, power was the consequence of the drive for domination, the immediate aim of all political action, and the essence of international politics (Guzzini, 2013, pp. 47).
Realists vigorously contend that conflict is inevitable, even essential in international politics (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 36). Force and ultimately, war is a significant means of settling matters when arguments cannot be resolved at peace (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 36). “Insofar as order exists in international relations, it is the precarious product of the balance of power or hegemony (Chiaruzzi, 2012, pp. 36).” Therefore, the idea of a balance of power and interest is justifiably recognized as a central theme in realism (Williams, 2004, pp. 649). This essay seeks to examine the different variants of realism and identify the role played by pow...
... middle of paper ...
...the differenes of two main approaches of realism, however, classical realism and neorealism share key concepts and doctrines in which power is central to realist perspectives.
Chiaruzzi, M. 2012. Realism. In: Devetak, R., Burke, A. and George, J. eds. 2012. An Introduction to International Relations. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-47.
Donnelly, J. 2000. Realism and international relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.
Guzzini, S. 2013. Power, Realism and Constructivism. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Morgenthau, H. J. 1972. Six principles of political realism. Politics Among Nations, pp. 88-95.
Williams, M. C. 2004. Why ideas matter in international relations: Hans Morgenthau, classical realism, and the moral construction of power politics. International Organization, pp. 633-665.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Different schools of thought have generated arguments since the beginning of civilization. They represent different perspectives of every part of life, whether its religion or politics. The realist school and the humanist perspectives offer people different views in many different aspects. The realist school is based on the thought that human nature is not perfectible. Human nature is viewed as evil and something that cannot be trusted or counted on. In order to have a successful society the citizens need to be controlled by a strong sovereign government.... [tags: Thomas Hobbes' Philosophy]
732 words (2.1 pages)
- The Second World War was, without doubt, the most destructive conflict in world history. According to some estimates, anywhere from sixty to eighty million people, civilian and combatant alike, were killed. Through its carnage, the international community, long divided and discordant, emerged to combat expansionist and genocidal ambitions. As the immeasurable devastation of the war became omnipresent, those concerned with its administration turned their attention to the question of its aftermath.... [tags: Economy, War, Development]
1259 words (3.6 pages)
- International Relations Perspectives Realist Perspective The basis for the realist perspective focuses on the struggle for power; and, proposes that this is the central cause of events in international affairs. This perspective “sees the world largely in terms of a struggle for power in which strong actors seek to dominate weak ones and weak actors resist strong ones to preserve their interests and independence…There is no overarching or universal center of power in the world that is recognized by all actors as legitimate…[It} emphasizes power: human nature at the individual level, aggressive states at the domestic level, leaders pursuing domestic and international power at the foreign polic... [tags: political science]
918 words (2.6 pages)
- In the world of international political economy, three dominant perspectives have emerged over time. The differences and similarities between the realist/mercantilist, liberalism, and historical structuralism perspectives are significant. In this essay, I will compare and contrast these dominant perspectives. First, I will give a historical account of how each perspective originated. Then I will outline the actors involved in each perspective, explore those actors’ interests, and outline which of those actors set economic and political policy.... [tags: essays research papers fc]
1531 words (4.4 pages)
- Why and how did globalization occur. Different perspectives have different explanations as to why and how globalization evolved. Realists argue that international trade is most effective when there is hegemony in the world market, whereas liberalists believe that it is a matter of how countries use the idea of reciprocity in their decision about trade. I agree with the realist perspective because hegemony allows the global economy to enhance and international trade functions the best when a hegemon dominates the world market.... [tags: Globalization, International Trade]
741 words (2.1 pages)
- ... • Although power was balanced for the time being, Germany feared future imbalances, particularly from the growing power of Russia. • Britain, the previous hegemon, had seen its power decline at the turn of the twentieth century; thus it could no longer guarantee the security of Europe. • A domestic-level relist explanation holds that German domestic politics were unduly aggressive, causing the country to go to war. (p. 1) According to the realist perspective and taking into account the details listed by Forsberg, the dominant power was not isolated and it sought to span an overall system rather than stay contained or restricted.... [tags: balance of power, russia, germany]
1325 words (3.8 pages)
- INTRODUCTION In this paper, I intend to analyze Iraq war of 2003 from Realist and Marxist/ Critical perspectives. I intend to draw a conclusion as to which theoretical framework, in my opinion, is more suitable and provides for a rational understanding of the Iraq War. While drawing comparative analysis of two competing approaches, I do not intend to dismiss one theory in entirety in favour of another. However, I do intend to weigh on a golden balance, lacunas of both theories in order to conclude as to which theory in the end provides or intends to provide a watertight analysis of the Iraq war.... [tags: realist, marxist, theory, policy, power]
2300 words (6.6 pages)
- The Cuban Missile Crisis lasted two weeks in the midst of the Cold War, and brought the world closer to nuclear war than ever before. In October of 1962 multiple nuclear missiles of the Soviet Union’ s were discovered in Cuba, a mere 90 miles south of the United States. Given the communist ties between Cuba and the USSR, this poised a considerable threat to our national security. Throughout the 14 days the two leaders, John F. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev struggled to clearly understand each others‘ genuine intentions.... [tags: Power Differentials, Diplomatic Resolution]
896 words (2.6 pages)
- Realism is one of the important perspectives on global politics, it is a notion about the conservative society and political philosophy (Heywood 2011: 54; Shimko 2013: 36). Besides, Gilpin (1996) claims that “realism…, it is not a scientific theory that is subject to the test of falsifiability, therefore, cannot be proved and disproved.” (Frankel 1996: xiii). The components of the realist approach to international relations will be discussed. Firstly, the state is an important component in the concept of realism.... [tags: power, anarchical, survival]
982 words (2.8 pages)
- The Realist and Liberalist Perspectives on International Relations and US Policy Stance Toward Iraq There are two prominent stances in International Relations. The schools of thought are commonly referred to as realist and liberalist. There are various names that they are called, and they can also be split further into subdivisions. However, for the purposes of this question I will just refer to the main schools of thought, and the main aims of both the paradigms. At a first glance at this question, my gut feeling is that the United States aims to achieve the same as the liberalists, that of world peace.... [tags: Papers]
1187 words (3.4 pages)