Why History Is Important And Why: Why Is History Important?

1614 Words4 Pages

Why is history important?
What is the relevance of studying History in our day in age? How does it pertain to us when it's something that happened a long ago? I remember that so many kids in high school would complain about history class, but they clearly did not understand all of the important reasons to study history. Virtually, history is inescapable, it studies our past and provides its relevancy of the knowledge in the present. It connects things through time and encourages students to interpret these connections. When you really think about it all people are living histories. For example, the languages use in our day and age, mostly, are inherited from the past. We continue to build our society with complex cultures, traditions, and religions …show more content…

It is essential because it provides history with raw material that they can figure out how they came into existence within the period. In studying the records of the past, examining propaganda of various sorts may distorts someone thoughts based on someone's perception of truth but angled so as to make a better case for something than an unorganized compilation of facts might do all by themselves. In other words, all writers have a purpose in writing, or else why write? Histories are no different in that regard from novels and sometimes in other ways as well, such as in their disdain for reality but that's no reason to despair of the truth. There are times we can come very close to seeing what really happened or at least certain historical truths if we address the data intelligently and in full awareness of the processes that guide the creation of history. For instance, if confirmation of a certain historical event comes from several different sources whose reports appear not to have influenced one another, these are called external sources, that too many historians constitutes compelling evidence about the existence and nature of an event. In other words, if a soldier who fought in a battle, a general who oversaw the battle and a doctor who treated those wounded during the battle all record the same basic facts, then we can feel fairly certain things proceeded along those general lines in the course of the battle. It's highly unlikely all these people had the same propagandist agenda. This is the sort of thing one must look for in tracking down what-really-happened. The first thing to do, then, is to learn as much as possible about the data handed down to us as history. We must ask about the author or artist if the information comes from a work of art and the time when that information was set down. Next, we have to ask how this information came down to

Open Document