Two Ways A Woman Can Get Hurt By Jean Kiilbourne

791 Words2 Pages

The world is becoming more aware of the gender hierarchy occurring in our society. Men are consistently leaders and placed in positions of power while women are seen as inferior. Jean Kilbourne, author of “Two ways a Woman Can Get Hurt”, investigates this ideology as she looks throughout media and advertisements and highlights their sexually explicit commercials that degrade woman. In comparison, Allan G. Johnson, writer of Why Do We Make So Much of Gender?, discusses how the world’s view of gender has changed over time and how it has affected the world. Kilbourne and Johnson outline the presence of a gender hierarchy but do not accurately interpret why it happens. The underlying presence driving patriarchy is hidden deep in men’s resistance …show more content…

Men are looked at as brave, selfless people and are perceived as heroes all throughout society. Johnson addresses this point saying, “The idea of heroism, for example, has been appropriated almost entirely by patriarchal manhood. From movies and television to literature to the nightly news, our ideas of who and what is heroic focus almost entirely on men and what they do” (548). Since men have power in this world, they have generated a society that pleases them. Superhero movies are a huge money maker in today’s world. But, the most popular superheroes are exclusively men such as Batman, Superman, Captain America, The Flash and The Hulk. This media only feeds into the ideology that men are the heroes in the world and they are the ones making sacrifices for others. They see a world that appeals to them and do not see a reason to mess with the system. Kilbourne writes, “When power is unequal, when one group is oppressed and discriminated against as a group, when there is a context of systematic and historical oppression, stereotypes and prejudice have different weight and meaning” (499). Men now see patriarchy as natural and how life should be. They can look back at previous generations and see that they succeeded with patriarchy and feel they should do the same. Men see absolutely no reason as to why they should relinquish their position of …show more content…

“Afraid of what?” you may ask, they are not completely sure themselves. Men do not know how the world will change if women become equal. They fear that their role in society will diminish and they will be left out. Allan Johnson addresses this once in his piece saying, “Women’s potential wildness so threatens patriarchy that it’s been suppressed and twisted to the point of being unrecognizable and shows itself on rare and predictably controversial occasions” (549). Men are afraid of what would happen to them if women were able to take on powerful roles in the world. As Johnson says, men combat this by suppressing a woman 's rebellious nature to the point that their few outbreaks are predictable and can be easily dealt with. In order to maintain their position of power, men have to ensure they are always in complete control of the situation. Kilbourne discusses this point in her essay writing, “In his classic essay ‘The Cybernetic of Self’ Gregory Bateson describes the fundamental belief of Western culture that we can dominate, control, and have power over almost every aspect of our experience. We can get rid of pain, we can dominate people who threaten us, we can win any interaction, we can be invulnerable” (509). That perfectly describes the mindset required of men in order to keep gender hierarchy in effect. Men are comfortable

Open Document