Introduction Evidence-based practice utilizes research design analysis from arrays of studies design, it is imperative for research scholars to understand how to read, and how to comment on the quality of research design utilized. There is three major research designs, namely quantitative, qualitative and mixed method; however; mostly utilized in evidence-based practice are quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative and qualitative research designs are exclusive in the description and generate distinct outcomes. Quantitative research design explores relationship amongst independent design variables, the data compilation approach and design firmly controlled than the qualitative data compilation (Polit & Beck, 2017). The outcome of an …show more content…
The qualitative research design posit reduced constraint and permits the researcher to augment influences into the analysis, the qualitative research design disadvantage is the incapacity to exploit a generous proportion of sample participants, as the result of the significant amount of data obtained, and the tiresome amount of time needed to complete the task at hand. The qualitative research study had approximately seven leadership teams from the “Markey Cancer Center oncology clinical care” (Wittenberg-Lyles & Ferrell, 2013). The qualitative research design incapability to utilize large sample size hampered the validity, a research scholars’ capacity to utilize additional sample size contributors bestows additional evidence-based novel to the healthcare quality and safety practice for the population at large. The quantitative research design article utilized questionnaire methods to obtain its information, and the SPSS numerical instrument version 13.0 to investigate and present the outcomes (Azimzadeh et al., 2013). The quantitative research design advantage is its easiness and straightforwardness approach that constructs the research outcome with unblemished and succinct whilst diminishing any bias related to the design. The disadvantage of this analysis is the researcher inability to gather additional data from the contributors because the patients’ felt that frontline nurses exhibit the caring conduct that is essentially significant to them (Azimzadeh et al.,
Catheter Acquired Urinary Tract Infections (CAUTIs) has become to be classified as one among the leading infections which most individuals end up being susceptible to acquire while at the hospital. Healthcare-associated or acquired infections (HAIs) are a significant cause of illness, death, and more often than not, have resulted to cost the tax payers potentially high medical expenses in most health care settings. ("Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality," para. 1) Due to this, 1 out of every 20 patients will end up with CAUTI within the US hospitals and this has caused Agency for healthcare research and quality (AHRQ) to embark on nationwide plans to help in the eradication and control of CAUTI incidences. ("Agency
Evidence –Based Practice is a process through which scientific evidence is identified, appraised, and applied in health care interventions. This practice obliges nursing experts to depend on logical research and confirmation more frequently than experience or instinct. EBP is intended to guide medicine of patients in a regulated methodology. This model joins together research, investigation and patient history to give the most exhaustive consideration conceivable. EBP got mainstream throughout the late 1970s. In any case, the thoughts behind the practice were presented much sooner than by nursing pioneer Florence Nightingale. As stated by Carole Cooper, "Nightingale evaluated nature's turf, gathered information, distinguished intercessions and observed patient results." This methodology mirrors current evidence- based practice. Utilization of EBP expanded throughout the 1970s and 1980s in light of calls for additional productivity in patient consideration. While restorative exploration discoveries were accessible, specialists and attendants were not equipped to get to or execute the new data rapidly enough. This new system joined together components of useful information and experience with clinical examination discoveries and investigation.
How to explore the different ways of differentiating evidence-based nursing practice and the usefulness of the process for providing the practices in the framework of evidence-based practice and nursing research studies. The most surprising information in this first five weeks is learning how to assess the theoretical- abstract components, designs in quantitative research, various methods for data collection in quantitative studies, PICO of nursing research studies and its meaning: patient, intervention, comparison and outcome. (Polit & Beck, 2014)
Evidence based practice is instilled in many nursing students these days on how patient care should be practiced. For some reason, once school is over, many nurses do not go on to further their learning. They lose the passion to research and take nursing as a job with a paycheck. Maintaining competencies can become a challenge for those who are not passionate about learning and learning new ways of practicing can be a struggle beause they do not care.
The development of knowledge requires a number of processes in order to establish credible data to ensure the validity and appropriateness of how it can be used in the future. For the healthcare industry, this has provided the ability to create and form new types of interventions in order to give adequate care across a of number of fields within the system. Research then, has been an essential part in providing definitive data, either by disproving previous beliefs or confirming newly found data and methods. Moreover, research in itself contains its own process with a methodological approach. Of the notable methods, quantitative research is often used for its systemic approach (Polit & Beck, 2006). Thus, the use of the scientific method is used, which also utilizes the use of numerical data (Polit & Beck). Here, researches make use of creating surveys, scales, or placing a numerical value on it subjects (Polit & Beck). In the end the resulting data is neutral and statistical. However, like all things its approach is not perfect, yet, it has the ability to yield valuable data.
In social work evidence based practice is considered to be a decision making process and practitioners rely on the evidence when working with clients. According to Aveyard and Sharp (2013), evidence based practice is not easy to put into practice and there are many barriers to evidence based practice such as lack of time, lack of awareness of research, lack of support and cooperation, and lack of authority and inadequate facilities (p. 145). Although there are challenges to implementing evidence base practice this is still a doable task in the field of social work. Therefore, practitioners need to explore the motivation, knowledge and skills needed by the individual, the organizational motivation, learning
Creswell, J. (2013) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Within this essay Evidence based Practice will be identified and the significant effect it has on the nursing profession, barriers will also be explored in the implementation of Evidence Based Practice.
Evidence based practice (EBP) is a key component in delivering cost-effective, high quality health care. [1] However, only around half of the care providers in the United States utilized EBPs. Additionally, nearly a quarter of services delivered to American consumers are unnecessary and potentially harmful. Today, educators are teaching and promoting evidenced based health care to future nursing professionals. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) supports this action as a means to achieve the objective that 90 percent of all medical treatments have a foundation in evidence based practices by the year 2020.
In evidence base practice cross-sectional, cohort, and RCTs fall under quantitative research. Although the type of design that is used to conduct the research may be different all three styles have numerical data that can be analyzed in order to identify an association between variables. In public health, this type of research helps develop a hypothesis where a research can make observations, run the experiment, and develop programs to address the issue. Nevertheless, the differences between the styles is that cross sectional studies are set in one point in time. For instance, the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention, NHANES survey, gathers data from a specific point in time to assess the health of the nation. Cohort studies are
Now within the rest of this paper you will be finding a few different things getting discussed. Staring it off we will be discussing the articles that we have found to make our arguments and hypotheses. After wrapping up the literature reviews we will be discussing the hypotheses thus continuing onto our variables and indicators. Once we discuss our hypotheses we will be moving onto the research design. The research design will have our general issues, sampling, and methods.
METHODOLOGY This section provides details of study design . It describes study design , preparation for study , study method , statistical analysis , confidentiality and ethical considerations . STUDY DESIGN : . It was an exploratory study based on service evaluation . It involved retrospective review of clinical records of a cohort of subjects admitted to an approved premise over a period one year .
Descriptive Reflection Throughout my nursing career I have never truly understood or accepted nursing theory as anything of great importance. Truthfully through previous courses I found myself wondering how nursing theorists even considered themselves a part of nursing at all. Nursing theorists’ views in my eyes were so drastically removed from what was actually occurring medically within my patients that I felt that the entire subject was worthless.
The research design is Descriptive studies. Descriptive studies are well structured, they tend to be rigid and its approach cannot be changed every now and then. Descriptive studies are undertaken in many circumstances:
This chapter is describing the research methodology for the study. In this chapter, key elements such as the geographical area of the study conducted, the sample and population of the study design and the instrument that used to collect and analyze data were fully describe. Most of the researcher were detailed the methodology so that they can reached the purpose of the study.