Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Globalization impact on human resources
Globalization impact on human resources
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Globalization impact on human resources
In America, life is grand, or for lack of a better word, ignorant. Someone once said that ignorance was bliss, which is sometimes true because sometimes is better to not know. However, in this case, we have been ignorant too long. It is better to know and we need to wake up. Imagine you are driving your car down a highway, and you accidentally nod off. You now have no control of your car. It may stay straight and continue to go down the road, and it may not. If you do wake up you realize that you were out because the scenery around you is now different, and if you don’t, you will continue until you crash. This has been America for some years now; we have been asleep at the wheel, in our own worlds blissfully unaware of life going on around us. We must wake up before we crash, because just like a car, the crash stops you and will damage your car maybe even to the point of no repair, and could even kill you.
Thomas Friedman discusses his concerns on globalization and the readily flattening world in his book, “The World Is Flat.” He starts off his journey when on a trip to Bangalore he realizes that he is not in Kansas anymore. All around him are advertisements for American companies like Pizza Hut and HP while he plays golf. He also encounters Indian workers that are working for American companies (outsourcing at its finest). They have adopted American accents and American names as well. Finally, his last reality check comes when he visits Infosys Technologies and sees their huge conference room with their millions of screens that allows them to talk to people from around the globe, like their producers and supplies and manufacturers, at the same time via satellite and teleconferencing technology. On his way out the head of this giant company tells Friedman that the playing field is being leveled, and the more Friedman thinks about this the more he realizes that he is right. Friedman was asleep at the wheel, just like the rest of America. However, once woken up, realizing that damage was being done, he was eager to make up lost time.
According to Friedman we went through three major forms of globalization, and I guess in his lack of creativity he decided to name them 1.
Today’s news covers up the reality that is going around the world. The new is like a distraction for the people of America. He actors, politics, and rich families. The main distraction that has most people in the edge is Ethan Couch murder. A young under age DWI that kills four innocent people for driven under the influence. The punishment that was given to him is for a minor crime like stealing or something in that category. The dead means nothing to the murder but to the family it means the world and mostly if is there children. Parents should not have to see their children die. Why the government is corrupted, wealth, morals, and parents’ education are no longer in place to protect the innocent people.
As modern America has progressed, it has had many advancements. Those advancements in turn have only compounded the problems they were meant to solve by adding copious amounts of obstacles. Progressive movements in people’s rights have been met with opposition, the country has become scared due to terrorist threats and local attacks such as: bombings and shootings, and now America is worried about the future. America’s zeitgeist is easily offended, frightened, and concerned.
As Americans we have to start to comprehend that the world around us is changing technologically, politically, and economically. In “The Last Superpower” an excerpt from the book The Post American World by Fareed Zakaria published in 2008. Zakaria emphasizes on these changes. Thomas Friedman the author of “The World is Flat” a piece from the book The World is Flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century published in 2005 also emphasizes on the same changes currently happening in the world. Zakaria and Friedman define these changes as globalization. The obvious common ground shared by both authors is their representation of globalization and the effects that it has and will continue to have on modern life. In contrast to sharing the same main topic both authors take a drastically different approach on how the relay their information to the audience. The differences displayed are mainly due to their personal and educational backgrounds, definitions of globalization as well as the individual writing styles of each author.
The world is ever changing and has been that way even before humans dominated Earth. However, what we are interested in for this topic is in the last few decades where globalization has had an impact in the early 21st century, making the world "flat". The phrase that the world has become flat is a metaphor for viewing the world level in terms of commerce and competition, meaning a level playing field where everyone has an equal opportunity. However, opinions are divided on how much globalization has actually impacted the world as a whole. Critics argue that Friedman’s term "flat" is grossly exaggerated as his view is from an American perspective. This paper investigates major arguments for both sides.
...nce, that while the bourgeoisie can assert its interests everywhere.” (Conklin & Fletcher, 1999, p. 50). Even though today’s society has branched away from an imperialistic mindset, the roots of globalization promote the advancements of power to those who are already very much in power, minus the war and the bloodthirsty monopolizations. To step outside the spectrum of imperialism, and ponder upon today’s world culture, America seems to be shaping the world, as we know it. The blueprint of progress and ever changing industrial, economical and global influences are greatly dependent on that of America and their innovations. It may not be American scientists behind the computers at NASA or behind the keyboards of Windows computers but there are U.S. based industries. The exponential progress of Globalization can be directly linked to American affairs, without a doubt.
The three Globalizations contrast in many ways. Globalization 1.0, lasting from 1492 to about 1800, was about countries and muscles. Its force driving the process of global flattening was the amount of "muscle" your country had. The key agent of change in Globalization 2.0, which lasted from 1800 to 2000, was the power of multinational companies, which went global for markets and labor. Globalization 3.0, beginning in 2000 flattened the playing field even more. The dynamic force was the power by which individuals could collaborate and compete globally. They could do so digitally with the convergence of the personal computer with fiber-optic cable. Globalization 3.0 differs from the previous two not only in how the world is flattening, but also in the types of people involved. In Globalization 1.0 and 2.0 it was mostly American and European businesses who...
Why do so few Americans not see all of the problems in society? Do they simply not care or are they not able to see them? With Thoreau's statement, "To be awake is to be alive", he implies that Americans have their eyes closed to these issues. They do not choose to overlook these issues but they simply pass them by because their eyes are shut. Some people are not able to grasp the concept in Thoreau's statement and find it to be foreign or subversive because it threatens the way the see the world.
...eir scruples. Well this was my reaction when I first began to read this book. After reading the first section of this book, the question that arises is what next? The world is transforming day by day, and we have made so many achievements due to globalization. When the internet came on the scene, who knew it would be as significant to our lives as it is. The fact that in over they can hold a conference in one room and only one person is there, while the others are connected through satellite and their location is not one but many other places around the world is amazing to me. I just think it is sad that because it is cost efficient for these companies that many people have lost their jobs to this people in these foreign countries. I just wish they could find a better way to improve this situation without people suffering and being jobless.
13 November, 2006. Drum, Kevin. " Falling flat: Thomas Friedman's recycled view of globalization. " The Washington Monthly, May, 2005, 1-3. 16 Nov 2006.
...in the new “flat world” individuals need to figure out how to become “untouchable.” He explains that “untouchables are people whose jobs cannot be outsourced, digitized, or automated” (184). He explains that in a “flat world” there is no longer a job based solely on geographic, but rather in most cases an available job “will go to the best, smartest, most productive or cheapest worker-wherever he or she resides” (183). He goes on to show that companies and individuals have to look at the global picture today in order to succeed (183).
Nowadays, due to the advances in transportation and communication technologies, globalization generates further interdependence of both the economics and cultural activities among countries. This interaction causes mutual understanding, balance, and also conflict. Thomas Friedman, the author of “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention”, speaks highly of globalization. He claims that it could bring peace to human beings, since countries in the same global supply chain are less likely to go to war. Andrew Marantz, on the other hand, realizes that cultural assimilation accompanied by the international collaboration creates an identity crisis in India in his essay “My Summer in an Indian Call Center”. Globalization could cause cultural cost, such as a loss
...o we can achieve our dreams in life: “we are now living in a world where time and space don’t matter anymore” just like J.Mittleman said. Globalization as we just learned is relative, whether it’s an opportunity or an exploitation depends on where you sit and how you look at the world. Kent, J., Kinetz, E. & Whehrfritz, G. Newsweek. Bottom of the barrel. - The dark side of globalization (2008/March24). David, P. Falling of The Edge, Travels through the Dark Heart of Globalization..Nov 2008. (p62)
First of all, Friedman talks about the different levels of globalization. There are 3 different time periods in which the society has differed and changed, bringing us to where we are today. Globalization 1.0, which took place from 1492 to 1800, was the first step to making the world flatter. The coming to America, and the industrial drive that came along with this is what most characterized globalization 1.0. The industry drive was about things such as manpower and horsepower, and how well we could utilize these in the world market. This caused the world to “shrink” a little bit, and become flatter. With the discovery of a new world, it broadened the area in which business was conducted, but the commonality of rule and trade caused the distance to be spanned more frequently. I think Friedman’s notions regarding globalization 1.0 is very accurate. The world in our terms began in 1492 with the discovery of North America. Once the area began to be inhabited and settled, there was much more worldwide interaction. Communications and trade between the American colonies and England increased, and this began a more stable business of worldwide association. I believe that Friedman’s theory is true, because the discovery of a land across the ocean for th...
According to Friedman, “globalization is the inevitable integration of markets, nation-states and technologies to a degree never witnessed before – in a way that is enabling individuals, corporations and nation-states to reach around the world farther, faster, deeper, and cheaper than ever before and in a way that is enabling the world to reach into individuals, corporations, and nation-states, farther, faster and deeper, cheaper than ever before.” (XXXXX)
Larsson, Thomas. The Race to the Top: The Real Story of Globalization. Cato Institute, 2001.