What´s Anti-Judaism and Antisemitism?

964 Words2 Pages

Before taking this course, I was under the impression that anti-Judaism and antisemitism were one and the same; however, in lecture YPS emphasized that there was a distinction between the two. While both anti-Judaism and antisemitism refer to hostility directed at those identified as Jews, anti-Judaism refers to the negative attitudes manifested towards adherents of the Jewish religion. By contrast, antisemitism takes on a more politically and racially-charged tone by not discriminating against Jews based on their religion per se, but rather by attacking them on the basis of supposed hereditary and genetic racial characteristics.
A close examination of the history of French Jewry makes it clear that antisemitism is a relatively modern concept. This was demonstrated by the gradual transformation in the attitude of the French population towards Jews, which evolved from anti-Judaism to outright antisemitism.
The historical record of the Jewish experience in France is rife with prejudice, discrimination, and violence. The French Enlightenment brought about increased tolerance for Jews, and many enlightened Christian thinkers, specifically Abbé Grégoire and Count Mirabeau, began to call for the emancipation of Jews (PPT 3).
In spite of this, even the most progressive thinkers had Christian bias. While Jews were characterized in a negative fashion, it was generally believed that they had redemptive qualities. Many philosophers believed that Jews could be bettered, “fixed”, and ultimately integrated into French society (PPT 3). For example, in an essay entitled “Essay on the Physical, Moral and Political Regeneration of the Jews”, Abbé Grégoire argued that the persecution of the Jews was at the root of Jewish degeneracy, and that gran...

... middle of paper ...

...erated, antisemitism lived on and became ingrained in the French consciousness. World Jewry was stunned that such an affair could have occurred in France, the birthplace of liberty, equality, and fraternity, and the first country to emancipate its Jews. The fact that the public, including nobles and members of the clergy, saw Dreyfus, an assimilated Jew, as an outsider, suggested that assimilation was no longer a legitimate strategy to combat antisemitism.
One of the key differences between this newer form of Jew-hatred and the older anti-Judaism was that the proponents of these racist theories believed that Jews were inherently evil, and that they could not be reformed by society.
My exploration of the history of French Jewry and the events surrounding the Dreyfus Affair highlighted the distinction between theological anti-Judaism and modern, racial antisemitism.

Open Document