Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chesapeake region during the 16 and 17 century
Rise in population
Rise in population
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Chesapeake region during the 16 and 17 century
The Chesapeake region reached such high heights after such an unfamiliar and unfortunate beginning because of various changes in population, the economy, and household composition.
From 1630 to 1800, the demography of the Chesapeake region incessantly changed. One key factor that contributed to the sporadic changes in population was the mortality rates. In the Chesapeake region, the age at which people died became younger as time went by. Document 7 proves the increasing mortality rate by showing that the average of Chesapeake-born men who reached age 20, born between 1670 to 1679, lived longer than those born in later years such as 1720 to 1729. Although people died younger as the years passed, the population continuously grew. For instance, the average population of whites in the Chesapeake region in 1640 was about 3,901, but in 1770 the population grew to an mean of approximately 133,180 whites, around 34 times more than that of 1640. However, the arrival and settling of British migrants largely contributed to the flourishing population of the Chesapeake region. Religious tolerance or religious heterogeneity, especially in Maryland, could have been one element that may have influenced more British migrants to travel to the Chesapeake region. Document 4 shows that in the years 1630 to 1640, approximately 21.9 to 24.6 percent of all British migrants went to the Chesapeake region. By 1690 to 1700, migrants that went to the Chesapeake region increased to about 15,800 to 16,000 out of 44,100, or 35.8 to 33.0 percent. Some migrants became indentured servants to pay for their transportation to the colonies. However, with the rise and growth of plantations, servants gradually became replaced with slaves, as shown on document 10. As th...
... middle of paper ...
...nd 18.1 years of age. However, through 1740 and 1749, on average, women married at about 22 years of age. Consequently, women bore less children. The average completed family size, as stated in the sixth source, was 9.4 in 1650 to 1700, but it decreased to 6.9 in 1750 to 1800. Some families depended on inherited wealth. Document 18 shows the "division of estates" in Middlesex County, Virginia from 1699 to 1750. While through 1699, 93 percent of all sons received land, only 62 percent received land between 1720 to 1750. As the division of land between sons decreased, so did the population of people with land and wealth.
Although the Chesapeake region faced many obstacles such as the "starving time," fatal diseases, and dire population shortages, it ultimately evolved and grew because of population increases, economic fluctuation, and changes in household composition.
By 1699, slaves made up 14% of the Virginian population, a number that was increasing rapidly. Also, due to the increases in cash crop production, the Chesapeake colonies were able to become an even more important part of Triangular Trade, as they now traded cash crops for
The Chesapeake and New England regions were settled by people of English descent, but by 1700, they had become two distinctly different societies. They had evolved so differently, mainly because of the way that the settlers followed their religion, their way of conducting politics and demographics in the colonies. Even though the settlers came from the same homeland: England, each group had its own reasons for coming to the New World and different ideas planned for the colonies.
In the early part of the Chesapeake colonization the men and women had a very unbalanced ratio of men to women. There were ten men to one women, which made it very difficult to start a family.
During the 1700's, people in the American colonies lived in very distinctive societies. While some colonists led hard lives, others were healthy and prosperous. The two groups who showed these differences were the colonists of the New England and Chesapeake Bay areas. The differentiating characteristics among the Chesapeake and New England colonies developed due to economy, religion, and motives for colonial expansion. The colonists of the New England area possessed a very happy and healthy life. This high way of living was due in part to better farming, a healthier environment, and a high rate of production because of more factories. The colonists of the Chesapeake Bay region, on the other hand, led harder lives compared to that of the colonists of New England. The Chesapeake Bay had an unhealthy environment, bad eating diets, and intolerable labor.
...arate societies by the time of the 1700's. Agriculture, motive, people, religion, and terrain are all factors that affected how they grew apart. However, it is also through the actions of the men and woman who settled in the regions and the choices they made that led to the development of two societies. The Chesapeake region became a society of money-driven, wealthy plantation owners, virtually no middle class workers, and those in extreme poverty. The New England colonies, in contrast, developed into a society of middle class family men who placed extreme emphasis on religion. The two societies in what would become one nation may have had effects on America in the future. The dispute over slavery, the imbalance of workers, and the class differences cause rifts between the two regions over time. Two radically different cultures cannot coincide in harmony forever.
Second, those who migrated to New England tended to come over as families, quite dissimilar to the single men who flooded Chesapeake Bay. Obviously, a much more stable family life took root in New England. Single women in Chesapeake Bay were few and far between, and the few that were around were not single for long. It was much easier to establish families in New England, where the balance between men and women was much closer to equal. These strong families provided security and made the New England colonists live a more stable life than those who lived to the south in Chesapeake Bay.
Chesapeake district was for the most part swampy and not reasonable for average product developing exercises. However 5 years after their entry in the land saw the revelation of tobacco which really did well. In such manner, it is essential to take note of that because of the tobacco developing in the land, Chesapeake pilgrim utilized and utilized shabby work in their fields. They actually built up a contracted bondage framework in which people who wanted free entry to America had offer their administrations as far as work for a few years previously being permitted to go into America. Then again, New England locale was not portrayed of huge homesteads thus the vast majority of them essentially relied upon little ranches and other locally established sort of enterprises, for example, carpentry and printing. Because of the locally situated industry organizations, the New England pilgrims did not have to procure work as their families were sufficient to give the required work power to their
While both the people of the New England region and of the Chesapeake region descended from the same English origin, by 1700 both regions had traveled in two diverse directions. Since both of these groups were beset with issues that were unique to their regions and due to their exposure to different circumstances, each was forced to rethink and reconstruct their societies. As a result, the differences in the motivation, geography, and government in the New England and Chesapeake regions caused great divergence in the development of each.
The inconsistent fluctuation of the population had a profound effect on women that could have both supported the idea that the Colonial period was a "golden age," as well as taken away from it. For one, the population ratio of men to women was dramatically unbalanced. The numbers of men in the colonies greatly surpassed those of women. Lois Green Carr and Lorena S. Walsh in The Planter's Wife: The Experience of White Women in Seventeenth-Century Maryland, Lois Green Carr and Lorena S. Walsh state, "[...] in 1634-1635 men outnumbered women six to one." In addition to that, "From the 1650s at least to the 1680s most sources show a ratio of three to one." Even in 1704, in Maryland, the number of men surpassed that of women, for, "a census listed 30,437 white persons, of whom 7, 163 were adult women." As a result of the disproportionate gender ratios, women had a greater choice in marriage. Louis Green Carr and Lorena S. Walsh state, "There is some evidence that the absence of kin and the pressures of the sex ratio created conditions of sexual freedom in courtships that were not customary in England." Because men usually died before their younger wives, many women remarried. However, there were many dangers and obstacles that women faced on the journey to the new world and while living in the colonies, that could argue that the Colonial peri...
Firstly, both regions were founded to serve two completely different purposes. The Chesapeake region was founded for economic purposes. The settlers in Jamestown were on a search for gold. A majority of people were lone men predominantly aging in their 20s (Document C) who’ve set sail to Virginia in hopes of gaining fortune for their country. The New England area was founded for religious purposes. This
Chesapeake colonies of Virginia and Maryland were settled in the early 17th century. It was a difficult live for the first colonist; they had limited labor and were constantly raided by Native Americans. Colonist tried to use the Native Americans as a source of slavery. Most of the colonist’s farms were by forest areas so Native Americans would just leave in to the woods. Colonists were afraid of pressuring them from the fear of getting ambushed by gangs of Native Americans. Another reason Native Americans men made bad slaves was because the women in the tribes did the agricultural work in the Native American villages.
As a result they did not have the ability to survive through the geography of Virginia. It forced them to make peace with the Indians, who would Ultimately save them from completely dying out. Although this experience was horrible, in the end it helped them prepare for the future, and really set a mold to what the colony had to do to survive. South Carolina was founded as a major British colony in the south in 1663. The climate in South Carolina unlike the climate in Virginia was able to support a large population. It’s fertile soil, and warm temperatures made it easy for crops to grow. South Carolina also had a large population that was willing to work. This differentiated South Carolina from Virginia due to the fact that South Carolina different have to struggle for survival in their first year because of the climate difference. The warm weather was really a chain for other things to
...ere more concerned about the commonwealth of the people due to their strong sense of community. Chesapeake government placed a harsh rule to ensure the survival of the settlers like the colony of Jamestown. New England had a diverse product due to poor soil and cold weather. They engaged in small scale agriculture, fishing, trading and shipbuilding. The Chesapeake regions had a warmer climate therefore it was more suitable to farm. The economic products that the Chesapeake region produced were tobacco and rice. The New England colonies were more of a community than the Chesapeake colonies. One of the reasons was that the settlers New England emigrated as a family and the Chesapeake emigrants were mostly males with the ambition to find gold and to own a large plantation; this resulted in mostly male population without female to enforce a sense of a real community.
During the late 16th century and into the 17th century, European nations rapidly colonized the newly discovered Americas. England in particular sent out numerous groups to the eastern coast of North America to two regions. These two regions were known as the Chesapeake and the New England areas. Later, in the late 1700's, these two areas would bond to become one nation. Yet from the very beginnings, both had very separate and unique identities. These differences, though very numerous, spurred from one major factor: the very reason the settlers came to the New World. This affected the colonies in literally every way, including economically, socially, and politically.
When immigrants fled form England due to religious persecution, they sailed to the New World and founded colonies such as Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Hampshire, and New England as model Christian societies. They believed in constructing "cities upon hills," as John Winthrop put it, to guide those lost in the darkness of sin in England. Being founded by strict religious followers led the colony of New England to have very religious values and ethics. Document B displays a list of Emigrants bound for New England, most of which are groups of large families . The arrangement of families in towns created a tight knit community, which allowed a democratic government to form, were each person in the community had input, thus making an effective government. Virginia on the other hand developed distinctly differently. As document C shows, a list of emigrants bound for Virginia displays near to a 3:1 ratio of men to women and now families whatsoever . This difference affected the way the Chesapeake colony evolved. Without a family to invest in, men of the Chesapeake usually returned their proceeds back into the land, which they reaped it from. This created a community separated by vast plantations, which had little unity and no collaboration, thus making it difficult to produce an effective and democratic government. These demographic differences indeed differentiated the New England colony from the Chesapeake colony, but more distinct differences were found in each colony's geographic diversity.