Analysis Of Life Coaching

1125 Words3 Pages

The article opens up with an explanation as to what the method of coaching is. According to Holland, “life coaching”, as it is called, is considered to be a variant of typical counseling. Coaching is in its early stages (as of 2007), yet it is used in developments and processes that are designed to help individuals with aphasia live their lives to the fullest and improve their quality of life. The work of Goldsmith (an earlier mentioned practitioner) is the author’s main interest. Goldsmith’s approach involves what one may call a “Buddhist” way of thinking; meaning change is seen as a positive thing. Speech-language pathologists place their trust in their client’s ability to take on new skills, arrange their new language capabilities, and acquire new problem-solving tactics. Deeper into the article, we are introduced to Holland’s discussion of how SLPs may use the method of coaching to help families and individuals who are wanting to take on their previous lifestyle and workload after a stroke and how this is accomplished. There are explanations and examples as to how this method is …show more content…

Both must provide valid information about strokes, along with assistance and support. These are both critical during the early stages of the recovery process. Where the differences begin are the focuses. With coaching, the focus is on the “what is next?” aspect, whereas counseling is geared towards the “why?” aspect. Coaching is also more activity orientated, meaning the client is encouraged to choose his or her own goal and how he or she obtains said goal. The clinician acts as a mere enabler, guiding the client to where he or she wants to go. The foundation of coaching is based upon the fact that it is the client who holds the key to his or her own success. With this being known, it is impertinent that the clinician abandons the “boss” tendencies to allow the client to “take

Open Document